CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,922
RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah
- Thread starter CaptUSA
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 39,958
Things are getting out of hand (assuming they were ever "in hand" to begin with).
And it's going to get worse before it gets better (assuming it ever gets better).
And it's going to get worse before it gets better (assuming it ever gets better).
unknown
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,404
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,466
Correction: A second martyr.
unknown
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,404
Has this episode been posted?
"During a July 2025 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Charlie Kirk and his guest, Tucker Carlson, engaged in a detailed discussion centered on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged connections to Israeli intelligence.
The conversation represented a notable instance of questioning the actions of a key U.S. ally on a prominent conservative platform.
The core of the discussion revolved around the theory that Epstein's sex trafficking and blackmail operations may have been conducted on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, with Carlson specifically pointing to the possibility of Israeli involvement. Carlson articulated that it was "extremely obvious" that Epstein had "direct connections to a foreign government," and he argued that the reluctance in media and political circles to name Israel in this context was due to a climate of fear and censorship.
Both Kirk and Carlson were careful to frame their conversation as a matter of national interest and transparency, rather than an attack on Israel itself. They emphasized that asking critical questions about the potential influence of any foreign government on American soil should not be considered "hateful," "anti-Semitic," or "anti-Israel." Instead, they presented it as a fundamental right of citizens to hold their own government and foreign powers accountable.
Key points raised during their appearance included:
* Allegations of a Blackmail Scheme: Carlson put forward the idea that Epstein's activities were not merely the actions of an individual but were potentially part of a sophisticated blackmail operation designed to compromise influential American officials for the benefit of Israeli intelligence.
* Questioning Foreign Influence: Kirk echoed Carlson's concerns, stressing the need for open dialogue about the extent of foreign influence in American politics and affairs.
* The "Off-Limits" Nature of the Topic: A significant portion of the conversation was dedicated to the idea that it has become taboo to question the U.S.-Israel relationship or to suggest that Israeli intelligence could be involved in illicit activities on American soil. They argued that this unwillingness to engage in critical inquiry creates resentment and allows potentially harmful activities to go unexamined.
* High-Profile Connections: Carlson pointed to the known association between Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a significant piece of circumstantial evidence that warranted further investigation.
In summary, the content of Charlie Kirk's and Tucker Carlson's discussion regarding Israel was not a broad critique of the nation's existence or general policies.
Instead, it was a focused and pointed inquiry into the specific and serious allegations of Israeli intelligence potentially using Jeffrey Epstein as an asset to conduct a blackmail operation within the United States.
They positioned their discussion as a necessary, albeit controversial, examination of national security and foreign influence."
"During a July 2025 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Charlie Kirk and his guest, Tucker Carlson, engaged in a detailed discussion centered on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged connections to Israeli intelligence.
The conversation represented a notable instance of questioning the actions of a key U.S. ally on a prominent conservative platform.
The core of the discussion revolved around the theory that Epstein's sex trafficking and blackmail operations may have been conducted on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, with Carlson specifically pointing to the possibility of Israeli involvement. Carlson articulated that it was "extremely obvious" that Epstein had "direct connections to a foreign government," and he argued that the reluctance in media and political circles to name Israel in this context was due to a climate of fear and censorship.
Both Kirk and Carlson were careful to frame their conversation as a matter of national interest and transparency, rather than an attack on Israel itself. They emphasized that asking critical questions about the potential influence of any foreign government on American soil should not be considered "hateful," "anti-Semitic," or "anti-Israel." Instead, they presented it as a fundamental right of citizens to hold their own government and foreign powers accountable.
Key points raised during their appearance included:
* Allegations of a Blackmail Scheme: Carlson put forward the idea that Epstein's activities were not merely the actions of an individual but were potentially part of a sophisticated blackmail operation designed to compromise influential American officials for the benefit of Israeli intelligence.
* Questioning Foreign Influence: Kirk echoed Carlson's concerns, stressing the need for open dialogue about the extent of foreign influence in American politics and affairs.
* The "Off-Limits" Nature of the Topic: A significant portion of the conversation was dedicated to the idea that it has become taboo to question the U.S.-Israel relationship or to suggest that Israeli intelligence could be involved in illicit activities on American soil. They argued that this unwillingness to engage in critical inquiry creates resentment and allows potentially harmful activities to go unexamined.
* High-Profile Connections: Carlson pointed to the known association between Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a significant piece of circumstantial evidence that warranted further investigation.
In summary, the content of Charlie Kirk's and Tucker Carlson's discussion regarding Israel was not a broad critique of the nation's existence or general policies.
Instead, it was a focused and pointed inquiry into the specific and serious allegations of Israeli intelligence potentially using Jeffrey Epstein as an asset to conduct a blackmail operation within the United States.
They positioned their discussion as a necessary, albeit controversial, examination of national security and foreign influence."
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,466
I haven't heard anything, but a have suspicion that the "dangerous transgenders" thread is going to a lot of activity soon.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 39,958
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 39,958
https://x.com/esrtweet/status/1965877467500990776
Dear lefties:
One of yours just killed Charlie Kirk.
What you don't understand is that Charlie was a sweetheart compared to the people who are likely to gain power from the hatred you have sown with his death.
No, I don't know who those people are. And I don't expect to like them much when I find out. But I've studied history, and I know how this movie goes.
I fear what you have unleashed today. I think you will learn to fear it far more than I do.
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,922
It's a little too early for those kinds of assumptions, but they're not out of line. I'm going to withhold judgment for a while on this.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 39,958
Similar threads
