RINO Chris Christie Unveils Sweeping New Gun Control & Video Game Censor Plans For NJ

HOLLYWOOD

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
22,314
You know it's BS by these clowns in government, when Christie is banning Barrett rifles. How many times has a crime been committed with a Barrett rifle? Name them Christie... this is about complete government control and the real question is... who is Christie truly working for?

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/19/...tate-with-second-toughest-gun-laws-in-nation/

Chris Christie Unveils Sweeping Gun Control Plans
By Kevin McArdle April 19, 2013 4:55 PM
Share on facebook! Share on twitter!

Gov. Chris Christie unveiled gun control and violence prevention measures that are as comprehensive as they are ambitious.
CHRISTIE-300x209.jpg


Governor Chris Christie announces a plan to strengthen existing gun laws and background checks, bolster criminal penalties and treat the root causes of mass violence. (Governor’s Office/Tim Larsen) Christie acknowledges there is no way to prevent all violence in our society, but he says it is the job of government to question, to scrutinize and to demand more in an attempt to address the problem.
The plan calls for expanding New Jersey’s already strict gun control laws, expanding government-funded mental health treatment, making it more difficult for kids buy or rent violent video games, requiring that would-be gun owners show government-issued IDs and bolstering penalties for gun-related crimes.
“It’s hard for me to sit here today and say, ‘If all these things got imposed we’d see an ‘X’ percentage drop in gin violence in this state.’ I don’t know,” said Christie. “Bad people are going to do bad things and so, would greater penalties deter people? You hope they do.”

Expanding New Jersey’s Already Stringent Gun Control Measures:
New Jersey has the second toughest gun laws in the country. The first facet of Christie’s plan seeks to make them even stricter. This includes banning future purchases of the Barrett .50 Caliber; strengthening the state’s existing background check requirement by mandating that mental health records are included in the instant background check process at the time of a firearm purchase; and requiring firearms purchasers to present a valid government photo ID, along with the already mandatory Firearms Purchaser Identification Card.
Mental Health And Violence: At the announcement of Christie’s NJ SAFE Taskforce in January in the aftermath of Newtown, he talked about targeting and treating the root causes of violence. Too many times there are instances of unspeakable tragedy and the question is asked how such tragedy could have been prevented. His proposals is this area include;

  • Making it easier for health professionals and courts to require potentially dangerous people to receive the treatment they need whether it is in the form of inpatient or outpatient care. This will allow the monitoring of their progress and ensure they are receiving the kind of specific care they need.

  • Creating flexibility in the type of care an individual is receiving, making it easier for someone to move from inpatient to outpatient settings.

  • Changing the current standard of involuntary outpatient treatment to eliminate the uncertainty expressed by clinicians and courts regarding their authority to order this type of essential assistance.
Limiting Kids’ Access To Violent Video Games: According to the Governor, too often lost in the debate about controlling gun violence in our society is the almost constant exposure young children and adults have to graphic violence. Part-three of his plan includes;

  • Requiring that retailers post at the point of sale the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ERSB) ratings. Additionally, requiring retailers to develop, maintain and conspicuously display their policy on selling video games with an M or AO rating.

  • Requiring Consent of a Legal Guardian. This is not different than the kind of parental supervision expected when a child under the age of 18 goes to see an R rated movie, Christie is requiring that a legal guardian provide consent when a minor purchases or rents a video game that has a rating of “Mature” or “Adult Only.”
Increasing Penalties For Gun-Related Crimes:In a series of bills Christie seeks to impose or strengthen criminal penalties when it comes to selling firearms to convicted criminals, possessing a firearm with the intent to unlawfully transfer, hiring a “straw purchaser,” unlawfully possessing ammunition and engaging in firearms trafficking, among other areas. In addition, Governor Christie is seeking to reform bail laws for gun-related crimes by restricting the release on bail for aggravated firearms offenses and increasing bail requirements for aggravated firearms crimes.


http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20130419_ap_christieproposesmeasurestocurbgunviolence.html
 
This is the same Chris Christie who commuted a sentence for someone who went to the same high school as me (graduated one year earlier), because the individual was carry two guns back from Colorado. He actually asked the police on how to do it, and apparently he got the wrong advice.

Christie has been getting much worse. We don't hear his anti-big government rhetoric anymore, he endorsed Romney, he has embraced Obama, and he has become increasing more big government.
 
Supreme Court ruled that banning video games was unconstitutional.
 
Supreme Court ruled that banning video games was unconstitutional.

They also ruled that wealth redistribution schemes were unconstitutional. Several times, in fact. But the progressives just keep coming back again and again until they get the ruling they want.
 
Supreme Court ruled that banning video games was unconstitutional.

Read the fucking article. They are not banning anything. They are restricting the purchase mature rated video games to needing an adult guardian. Everyone knows it is a bunch of fluff that wont go anywhere.

The gun part of this article is what matters.

Slutter McGee
 
They also ruled that wealth redistribution schemes were unconstitutional. Several times, in fact. But the progressives just keep coming back again and again until they get the ruling they want.

The list of things like that is almost endless.
 
This is the same Chris Christie who commuted a sentence for someone who went to the same high school as me (graduated one year earlier), because the individual was carry two guns back from Colorado. He actually asked the police on how to do it, and apparently he got the wrong advice.

Christie has been getting much worse. We don't hear his anti-big government rhetoric anymore, he endorsed Romney, he has embraced Obama, and he has become increasing more big government.

Did he ever ACTUALLY support Obama? As much as I hate Obama with a burning passion, I don't really fault Christie for not playing politics after Sandy. I don't like Christie either, for that matter.

Granted, I don't really think I could stand beside a mass murderer in good conscience. But most of the Republicans who criticized Christie for that only dislike Obama because he doesn't do enough mass murder. There are much, much bigger issues than Christie being nice and not playing politics after Sandy.

The Romney endorsement is of course annoying, but Rand Paul did that too. So while that's also annoying, its not necessarily a deal breaker. At least not for me.

The big reasons I don't want Christie (I don't even know that much about him) is the gun control nonsense, the nonsense enforcement of anti-price gouging laws after Sandy, and I'm sure he also supports the other bad positions of the GOP like Wars on Drugs, Wars on Muslims, surveilance, exc.

Supreme Court ruled that banning video games was unconstitutional.

I don't like the restrictions that Christie wants but that doesn't make it a "Ban". "Children can't buy without an adult with them" isn't the same thing as a "Ban." A ban would be a big deal. This is just annoying.

They also ruled that wealth redistribution schemes were unconstitutional. Several times, in fact. But the progressives just keep coming back again and again until they get the ruling they want.

That, or try to add justices to the Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
Read the fucking article. They are not banning anything. They are restricting the purchase mature rated video games to needing an adult guardian. Everyone knows it is a bunch of fluff that wont go anywhere.

The gun part of this article is what matters.

Slutter McGee

The thing is, those games are ALREADY restricted by a private organization, the ESRB. The ESRB has even higher recognition than the MPAA, and if you walk into a Gamestop and buy an M rated or AO (Not that retailers even sell AO games), you will be carded, and they won't sell it to you if you're underage - if you want it then, you'd need your parents to get it for you. And hilariously, as I've known guys who work at Gamestop, parents will actually COMPLAIN about this when their kid wants to buy the latest Call of Duty and they have to get dragged in to tell the guy that they give their permission. The mechanics are already there, but people complain when they have to actually do some parenting.

These laws are pointless and are only there so Christie can say that he 'did something'.
 
The thing is, those games are ALREADY restricted by a private organization, the ESRB. The ESRB has even higher recognition than the MPAA, and if you walk into a Gamestop and buy an M rated or AO (Not that retailers even sell AO games), you will be carded, and they won't sell it to you if you're underage - if you want it then, you'd need your parents to get it for you. And hilariously, as I've known guys who work at Gamestop, parents will actually COMPLAIN about this when their kid wants to buy the latest Call of Duty and they have to get dragged in to tell the guy that they give their permission. The mechanics are already there, but people complain when they have to actually do some parenting.

These laws are pointless and are only there so Christie can say that he 'did something'.

Why couldn't they just call up on the phone and give permission? Granted, I don't agree with the law, but I don't see why you couldn't just use modern technology for this sort of thing...

I don't know if they changed it after Sandy Hook, but my school used to allow parents to sign 11th and 12th graders out of school by phone.
 
Back
Top