RI - The Brown University shooting

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
118,664
Very few details being released, but the suspect seems to have a large online leftist presence, apparently identifies as they/them and the victims were "targeted" specifically.

All this could be internet bullshit, so take it with a large grain of salt at this point.

 
 
While the shooting took place at the school, it looks to have been targeted, aka a murder or hit.

It doesn't appear to be a random shooting, or someone looking to kill a lot of people. Eyewitnesses are saying he just walked out past people without shooting...
 
While the shooting took place at the school, it looks to have been targeted, aka a murder or hit.

It doesn't appear to be a random shooting, or someone looking to kill a lot of people. Eyewitnesses are saying he just walked out past people without shooting...
A political hit, like Kirk?

Or was the young woman that was the College Republican VP just in the crossfire?

I know we're just guessing at this point, but what does your gut say?
 
Pretty girl maybe incel shooter
A political hit, like Kirk?

Or was the young woman that was the College Republican VP just in the crossfire?

I know we're just guessing at this point, but what does your gut say?

First guess would be a psycho with a grudge, which could be a guy she rejected, or a guy who imagined she rejected him. What prescription psych drugs is he on?

Or a stalker with a political grudge. Once again what meds was he on?

Could be a leftist copycat hit inspired by Charlie Kirk. She was not high profile though, so not the same possibilities of online "encouragement" as the Kirk killer.
 
Very few details being released, but the suspect seems to have a large online leftist presence, apparently identifies as they/them and the victims were "targeted" specifically.

All this could be internet bullshit, so take it with a large grain of salt at this point.


The other shooting victim was a young Muslim man from Uzbekistan.


876.jpg


But I get why he wouldn't be mentioned on an "EndWokeness" Twitter account.
 
First guess would be a psycho with a grudge, which could be a guy she rejected, or a guy who imagined she rejected him. What prescription psych drugs is he on?

Or a stalker with a political grudge. Once again what meds was he on?

Could be a leftist copycat hit inspired by Charlie Kirk. She was not high profile though, so not the same possibilities of online "encouragement" as the Kirk killer.
There are only two data points which are the two people killed. One was a white Republican woman. The other was a brown Muslim foreign man. I think speculation on motive at this point is kind of pointless.
 
There are only two data points which are the two people killed. One was a white Republican woman. The other was a brown Muslim foreign man. I think speculation on motive at this point is kind of pointless.

It's premature. At the same time, we can say that this was not a "mass shooting" event where someone was trying to kill as many people as possible.
 
It's premature. At the same time, we can say that this was not a "mass shooting" event where someone was trying to kill as many people as possible.
Actually that's not true. As @Anti Federalist has confirmed multiple times, a mass shooting event is whenever 4 or more people other than the shooter is injured. Whether someome is trying to kill as many people as possible is irrelevant. Remember the Dadeville Alabama "sweet 16" shooting a couple of years ago? It turns out that was most likely triggered (no pun intended) by someone mistaking the noise of a speaker falling over for a gunshot.

 
There are only two data points which are the two people killed. One was a white Republican woman. The other was a brown Muslim foreign man. I think speculation on motive at this point is kind of pointless.

Yes, even speculation based on the shooter's online presence is now pointless, since we're now told that the suspect is not the suspect.
 
I know we're just guessing at this point, but what does your gut say?

The lack of a suspect is different. I suppose the Charlie Kirk debacle could have taught them that immediately producing a prepackaged patsy has finally stopped working after 62 years. Or this one could actually be something that the government didn't engineer for a change.
 
So we're just going to keep ignoring the brown Muslim elephant in the room?

 
Back
Top