RFK Jr.'s 2024 POTUS campaign

[Snowball]

I don't understand what you are asking me.

What I heard out that interview was in reference to abusers/people doing their bidding, environmental damages caused by war and other, paid for by the tax payer. I believe said abusers should be held accountable for any/all damages, not the tax payer. This goes back to captured agencies, in bed with government, which is in fact a problem.

Is this concept so difficult to understand?

I'm not talking about that topic at all. You said "what I'm hearing" I'm asking if it's today's news just breaking recently
that RFK is in top level talks with the Libertarian Party again.

 

[PAF]

I'm not talking about that topic at all. You said "what I'm hearing" I'm asking if it's today's news just breaking recently
that RFK is in top level talks with the Libertarian Party again.

No, I never referenced anything about that, it doesn't even interest me. Maybe go back a few posts and read what the conversation is about.

 

[Snowball]

No, I never referenced anything about that, it doesn't even interest me. Maybe go back a few posts and read what the conversation is about.

I agree with your previous points, but this THREAD Is about RFK Jr.'s run for POTUS.

 

[69360]

I'm not talking about that topic at all. You said "what I'm hearing" I'm asking if it's today's news just breaking recently
that RFK is in top level talks with the Libertarian Party again.

I think would be in the best interest of both RFK and the LP. I hope they do it.

 

[acptulsa]

I think would be in the best interest of both RFK and the LP. I hope they do it.

They've run worse.

Recently.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Neither is/was George Soros. They still manage to put undue influence where their mouths are.

Why don't you try reading in the context of the real world once in your life? Koch, Soros, the people who own politicians aren't responsible for what goes on because they aren't politicians. Except when they influence that poor, gullible, sweet kid Trump, of course.

Pretty hypocritical.

Nobody said those people shouldn't be held responsible for any actual crimes.
The point that you so studiously ignore is that he wants to use any other crimes they may commit to get people to support defining producing CO2 and opposing global warming hysteria as crimes.
Then he wants to use them to set a precedent that will be used against ordinary Americans to prosecute them for these same "crimes" and follow it up by changing the law to allow him to jail politicians who oppose his climate con.

 

[Swordsmyth]

How about try listening.

What I heard and took from the interview was in reference to the Koch's, HALLIBURTON, and people doing their bidding, while taking No-Bid contracts for Billions of dollars [with the American tax-payer footing the bill], going to war, and causing/contributing to environmental damages. And you don't think they deserve 3-hots-and-a-cot, as repeat offenders?

I posted a wrod for word transcript of the relevant portion.
You can ignore the words or lie about them, but everyone else can read or listen to them and see what a liar you are and what an evil tyrant he will be.

Reporter: "What about Politicians, people who deny, who express skepticism?"
RFK: "I think they're selling out the public trust, and you know I think those guys who are doing the Koch brothers' bidding, who are against all the evidence of the rational mind, are saying the global warming doesn't exist, that they are contemptible human beings and that you know I wish there were a law you could punish them under, I don't think there's a law you can punish those politicians under, but do I think the Koch brothers should be prosecuted for reckless endangerment? absolutely, that's a criminal offense and they ought to be serving time for it."

So, CO2 is pollution, Global Warming is real and you should "trust the science" and he wants a law to imprison you if you don't.
Until he gets the laws he wants he is going to prosecute you for "reckless endangerment" for producing CO2.


He starts with debateable "crimes" like oil spills and pollution, then moves to claiming CO2 is pollution, and then moves to saying people should be jailed for speech and laws should be changed so politicians can be jailed for their positions.
The camel's nose in the tent approach.
"Don't you love children? don't you think child abusers should have their children taken from them? then why do you object to taking trans children from Christian parents?"

 

[acptulsa]

Nobody said those people shouldn't be held responsible for any actual crimes.
The point that you so studiously ignore is that he wants to use any other crimes they may commit to get people to support defining producing CO2 and opposing global warming hysteria as crimes.
Then he wants to use them to set a precedent that will be used against ordinary Americans to prosecute them for these same "crimes" and follow it up by changing the law to allow him to jail politicians who oppose his climate con.

Oh, yes. I forgot you read minds. How could anyone possibly doubt it?

 

[Snowball]

Live Event begins 2 pm EST

 

[PAF]

Live Event begins 2 pm EST

On now.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Live Event begins 2 pm EST

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1772644255430762551

“I want to get the word out and assure everyone that I am committed as ever to dedicating my life’s work to social justice, climate solutions and a thoughtful, caring democracy.”

Pass.

Don't need another ChiCom in a high place in government.

 

[PAF]

Pass.

Don't want or need another ChiCom anybody in a high place in government.

Fixed.

 

[sparebulb]

Barf.

 

[69360]

Blah wouldn't be my first choice, I get that he chose her for the money though. He needs the cash to run a viable campaign.

 

[pmbug]

The Wall Street Journal reports that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has picked Nicole Shanahan, a California-based attorney who was previously married to Google co-founder Sergey Brin, as his running mate for his long-shot presidential bid, according to people familiar with the decision.

Shanahan, 38, also runs a foundation focused on reproductive rights, criminal justice and the environment.

Before backing Kennedy’s independent bid, Shanahan had previously been a donor to Democratic campaigns, including supporting Joe Biden’s election in 2020.
...
Shanahan, a political novice, was thrust into the spotlight over her public split with Brin amid a brief alleged affair she had with Elon Musk in 2021 that ruptured the billionaires’ long friendship, The Wall Street Journal reported.

After the article published, Musk denied the allegations and Shanahan later followed suit.

It isn’t clear yet whether Shanahan plans to assist by tapping into her own wealth.
...

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rfk-jr-may-seek-libertarian-nomination-will-they-have-him

 

[sparebulb]

Well, i guess in this zero-sum shat-show, this hurts Biden more.

 

[Snowball]

I'm surprised but maybe he knows more than we do.

Anyway, still undecided here.

 

[PAF]

Still listening. I am happy to hear that he is actually addressing the issues that the Trump/Biden UNIPARTY won't even touch.

Nothing about fed reserv, etc.

 

[CaptUSA]

Not digging this choice, but hopefully it brings along a sizeable portion of the hippie left.

 

[Cleaner44]

I would love to see him running the FDA. Other than that, I have respect for him as a more honest democrat, but he is still a trash liberal.