RFK Jr.'s 2024 POTUS campaign

Where is your evidence of that?

I try to judge things based on their results rather than the stated intentions of politicians. When you do that, it is clear that the power of government has grown substantially since Trump was in charge. You think that was despite him and not because of him? But to me, that doesn't matter. I saw both sides of the uniparty working together during Trump's reign to steal our wealth, indebt our children and rob us of our liberty. And why?? I'm sure you'll agree that they did it because of Trump, right? That whole 2020 psyop was because they didn't have their chosen puppet at the helm of the power - NOT because the guy at the helm was trying to give the power back to the people!

If you're looking at results, you can only draw two conclusions: Trump was working with them or he was too inept to stop them. In either case, their power grew. If you want to say he was inept, fine. But then his "threat" to them turned out to be their biggest gift ever. He had a chance to "Make America Great Again" and ended up doing the exact opposite.

I have no illusions that RFK will return the power to the people, but at least he can disrupt this grip the DNC/RNC has over our government. (until they kill him)

Trump was never in charge and he used the power he did have to decrease government and blubt its growth where it did grow.
The deepstate reaction just proves it further.

Trump will have more power and do even better this time.

RFK will drop the mask and go right back to increasing government power in all the ways he still advocates for and all the ways he has temporarily stopped calling for in order to trick fools.
He's a pillar of the uniparty as are most of his family
 
Last edited:
He will just say you can't read.

He said that the guy who opposed Bill Gates' Mark of the Beast Jab, and is being suppressed by Google and every algorithm Fedbook owns (among others), is the tool, and the Ron Paul treatment and the fact that the DNC drummed him out of the party is 3D chess designed to give him street cred. And he said that the guy who funded Bill Gates' Mark of the Beast Jab, and gets incessant publicity in every MSM outlet, and has a (poor, as you noted) track record as president, is the outsider.

Now, you may think the theory is wrong or even idiotic. After all, if you pressed him hard enough he'd have to admit he's not GOD. But he thinks it is "his" theory, he thinks he is "his" theory, he tied his whole little identity up in it like a good little cultist. So, careful not to say anything against it. He'll take it personally and make you the subject of tomorrow morning's Swordsmyth Two Minute Hate Hour.

Because worshipping mortals and trashing their neighbors is what Christians are supposed to do.
You can ignore his support of the lockdowns and vaccines in addition to all his other liberty destroying positions but it won't make them go away or make others not see them.

And it is ridiculous to pretend he is being suppressed when the establishment is making sure he is very prominent as controlled opposition with a few pulled punches thrown to trick idiots.
 
In fact, Trump does better in a 3-way race than he does in a 2-way race, so why are the Trump slobberers trying to downplay RFK?? I mean, he helps their man. Unless it's not really about their man and it's really about more of your wealth and liberty they want.
1 in a 3 way race he will be used as part of the fraud, a place they can claim Trump's votes went that is less obvious than giving them to Biden directly.
Just like the KY LP was used to steal votes from Bevin to give to Beshear. (which was 100% fraud and which the LP bragged about)

2 there will be no 3 way race, Biden is going to be removed when it is too late to get a campaign going for any replacement (we see the narrative being built in the MSM for his replacement already but there is no viable replacement) and the Dems will endorse RFK and then use fraud to install him with the narrative that people preferred him to Trump and all of Biden's voters went to him along with centrists and RINOs.
 
He will just say you can't read.

He said that the guy who opposed Bill Gates' Mark of the Beast Jab, and is being suppressed by Google and every algorithm Fedbook owns (among others), is the tool, and the Ron Paul treatment and the fact that the DNC drummed him out of the party is 3D chess designed to give him street cred. And he said that the guy who funded Bill Gates' Mark of the Beast Jab, and gets incessant publicity in every MSM outlet, and has a (poor, as you noted) track record as president, is the outsider.

Now, you may think the theory is wrong or even idiotic. After all, if you pressed him hard enough he'd have to admit he's not GOD. But he thinks it is "his" theory, he thinks he is "his" theory, he tied his whole little identity up in it like a good little cultist. So, careful not to say anything against it. He'll take it personally and make you the subject of tomorrow morning's Swordsmyth Two Minute Hate Hour.

Because worshipping mortals and trashing their neighbors is what Christians are supposed to do.

Remember that the Kennedy bloodline is an elite (Pilgrim Society) New England family. As easy as it is to envision him in a JFK light, don't forget that Ted was his uncle. I've personally found that, strangely, I have more in common behaviorally with my uncles than I do with my father. Not sure how that happened but just my .02.
 
Last edited:
I contacted Vladimir Putin and requested he consider taking over the USA and fixing our problems.
He replied and said, "unfortunately the USA is beyond saving."
 
Here are five issues of critical importance to me, and I think the survival of the country as well.

Since none of you are presenting a cogent argument FOR a candidate (you're brainwashed, you're stupid, you're sucking blah blah blah's dick) and nobody seems to have the stomach for using the tools we have to FORCE a change, then what would you have me do, huh?

Convince me otherwise, tell me who, of the three who will be at the top of the heap, Biden, Trump, Kennedy, will address these issues in any meaningful way?

1 - The border. Who will make any progress in controlling the unwholesome flood? Who might suggest repeal of the Hart/Cellar Act? Who might be willing to pursue deportation of those who flooded the country already?

2 - Inflation. Who would be more likely to to take on the Fed? Who would be more likely to suggest sound money be returned?

3 - Reigning in the regulatory state. The primary cause of the increase in day to day consumable items is the doubling of diesel fuel prices. That increase is entirely due to regulation. Who of the three will best go after that unelected government of regulators, who are creating the vast majority of the "laws" that oppress us?

4 - War. Who, of the three, will reduce our involvement in wars around the globe and start the process of bringing the troops home most effectively and safely? The Afghan withdrawal disaster shows that it must be done competently.

5 - The Bill of Rights. Who is an "absolutist" when it comes to the BoR, in particular, the first and second amendments?
 
Here are five issues of critical importance to me, and I think the survival of the country as well.

Since none of you are presenting a cogent argument FOR a candidate (you're brainwashed, you're stupid, you're sucking blah blah blah's dick) and nobody seems to have the stomach for using the tools we have to FORCE a change, then what would you have me do, huh?

Convince me otherwise, tell me who, of the three who will be at the top of the heap, Biden, Trump, Kennedy, will address these issues in any meaningful way?

1 - The border. Who will make any progress in controlling the unwholesome flood? Who might suggest repeal of the Hart/Cellar Act? Who might be willing to pursue deportation of those who flooded the country already?

2 - Inflation. Who would be more likely to to take on the Fed? Who would be more likely to suggest sound money be returned?

3 - Reigning in the regulatory state. The primary cause of the increase in day to day consumable items is the doubling of diesel fuel prices. That increase is entirely due to regulation. Who of the three will best go after that unelected government of regulators, who are creating the vast majority of the "laws" that oppress us?

4 - War. Who, of the three, will reduce our involvement in wars around the globe and start the process of bringing the troops home most effectively and safely? The Afghan withdrawal disaster shows that it must be done competently.

5 - The Bill of Rights. Who is an "absolutist" when it comes to the BoR, in particular, the first and second amendments?

So, you want us to admit none of those three are perfect, so you can revert to your default position, right? None will do exactly what you want so you're going to "send a message" and vote for whomever kisses your ass best? You want to say, at least my guy makes palatable noises about three of the five, do either of the others beat that?

Only one of the three fought the covid psyop. Only one of the three spoke the truth about it in real time. Only one proved he will choose his hill to vanquish or die on using principle. You want a lesser of three evils? There he is.
 
Last edited:
So, you want us to admit none of those three are perfect, so you can revert to your default position, right? None will do exactly what you want so you're going to "send a message" and vote for whomever kisses your ass best? You want to say, at least my guy makes palatable noises about three of the five, do either of the others beat that?

Only one of the three fought the covid psyop. Only one of the three spoke the truth about it in real time. Only one proved he will choose his hill to vanquish or die on using principle. You want a lesser of three evils? There he is.

No, I want you to make your case.

If none of the above are any good, say so.

Kissing my ass?

No, I want the issues that are tearing my country apart and burning it to the ground addressed.

You don't like my plans, so, give me a better one.
 
No, I want you to make your case.

If none of the above are any good, say so.

None of the above fits your criteria. Or mine. Ron Paul isn't running.

I made my case. Only one stood against The Jab. He stood against it from the first. Neither of the others has said one thing against it to this day. Both were complicit in the millions and millions and millions of deaths it has caused, both funded the official U.S. government lawbreakers who created it.

I don't recall us ever having had a better acid test by which to measure three candidates.
 
Last edited:
I would like to hear Trumps response when somebody asks him, "In hindsight, was rushing the COVID vaccine and your response to the Pandemic a bad thing?"
 
I would like to hear Trumps response when somebody asks him, "In hindsight, was rushing the COVID vaccine and your response to the Pandemic a bad thing?"

So far, he hasn't stepped into a position where someone could and did put him on the spot that way. It's completely obvious that this is by design.

In other words, don't hold your breath.
 
I would like to hear Trumps response when somebody asks him, "In hindsight, was rushing the COVID vaccine and your response to the Pandemic a bad thing?"
Doubtful. Trump is still going to defend the COVID vaccines and Operation Warp Speed. The idea that Trump is going to flip on both those things within the next 9 months is delusional. If anything, the Democrats are more likely to flip on them since I believe the plan is to pin the medical fallout on the vaccines on Trump while Biden gets off Scott free as his mental decline/incompetence will be used as the perfect excuse.
 
None of the above fits your criteria. Or mine. Ron Paul isn't running.

I made my case. Only one stood against The Jab. He stood against it from the first. Neither of the others has said one thing against it to this day. Both were complicit in the millions and millions and millions of deaths it has caused, both funded the official U.S. government lawbreakers who created it.

I don't recall us ever having had a better acid test by which to measure three candidates.

And I keep posting the proof RFK did no such thing, but you continue to deny it.

And RFK is far worse on all other issues than Trump.
 
Fu3gBXuWAAIJrjs.jpg



d35953fdffff8fe6.png



image-13.png



image-9.png



image-6.png


fact-2-1a.jpg


image-5.jpg



https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1652164910363672576

RFK Jr. is supposed to be the hero of everyone who hated COVID lockdowns, yet he seemed to be the champion of all the governors who imposed the most irrational, excessive COVID lockdowns

Fu2rAxWWIAAPBEu.jpg


https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1652205726641651714

Is there even any evidence that this guy contemporaneously opposed COVID lockdowns, which people seem to just kind of take for granted that he must've done, despite the lack of any real evidence to that effect? God, some of you people are so easy to scam, it's embarrassing

Fu3QAdZX0AE3_9z.jpg




Anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. blames his Curb Your Enthusiasm star wife Cheryl Hines for ordering guests attending holiday party at his California home to get vaccinated or tested




  • Prominent anti-vaxxer Robert F Kennedy Jr. held a holiday party at his California home last week, with the invitation urging guests to be vaccinated or get tested
  • Kennedy, told his guests to undergo the same precautions he has railed against since the start of the pandemic in 2020
  • The anti-vaxxer stance has been particularly lucrative for the 67-year-old son of civil rights leader Robert F Kennedy, according to a Politico report
  • When the news outlet brought up the hypocrisy, Kennedy blamed his wife, Curb Your Enthusiasm star Cheryl Hines
  • 'I guess I'm not always the boss at my own house,' Kennedy told Politico's Daniel Lippman




https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...accinated.html
 
And I keep posting the proof RFK did no such thing, but you continue to deny it.

That's because I saw and heard him doing it, because I have eyes to see and ears to hear what's happening in the real world. It makes me frustratingly hard to gaslight.

And RFK is far worse on all other issues than Trump.

Opinions are like hemorrhoids. Every asshole gets one sooner or later.

Is there even any evidence that this guy contemporaneously opposed COVID lockdowns, which people seem to just kind of take for granted that he must've done, despite the lack of any real evidence to that effect? God, some of you people are so easy to scam, it's embarrassing

You're right to be embarrassed, trying to change the subject from Trump's Mark of the Beat Jab to lockdowns like nobody will notice.

As I have said before, but you didn't have eyes to see or ears to hear, the only thing you've got is he humored his wife once. And I'm sure we all know you never married, but those who have understand the meaning of the word "necessity". You're further making an ass of yourself by ignoring the phrase "...or tested."

Any way you slice it, it takes a lot of cognitive dissonance to believe Trump wasn't a damned sight worse.
 
Last edited:
That's because I saw and heard him doing it, because I have eyes to see and ears to hear what's happening in the real world. It makes me frustratingly hard to gaslight.



Opinions are like hemorrhoids. Every $#@! gets one sooner or later.



You're right to be embarrassed, trying to change the subject from Trump's Mark of the Beat Jab to lockdowns like nobody will notice.

As I have said before, but you didn't have eyes to see or ears to hear, the only thing you've got is he humored his wife once. And I'm sure we all know you never married, but those who have understand the meaning of the word "necessity". You're further making an ass of yourself by ignoring the phrase "...or tested."

Any way you slice it, it takes a lot of cognitive dissonance to believe Trump wasn't a damned sight worse.

And there you go again quoting a tweet I posted as if its words are mine, you never miss a chance to deceive.

Trump opposed lockdowns, opposed mandates, and tried to promote alternative treatments that would have prevented any use of the jabs, for this he got blamed for every single death in an election year while the states and the Bureaucrats went full speed ahead.

RFK ran around promoting the lockdowns, attacking Trump for not cracking down harder, requiring proof of vaccination to visit his home, and campaigning for all the worst governors pushing lockdowns and mandates.
His cheap cop out of blaming his wife for the vaccine mandate rings hollow in the face of his full throated support for all the people pushing it all.
 
God it's boring watching you repeat lies that have been refuted and debunked repeatedly. Requiring the jab to visit his home, when a cheek swab was a sufficient alternative as I just said and you just quoted?

Stop wasting everyone's time, including your own, Helen Keller. You know, most cultists avoid places where intelligent, sensible people congregate. It takes a special kind of blind, deaf and dumb to not only resist the deprogramming, but to think you're prosthelytizing them.

GGqqD1sWkAA02Hb.jpeg
 
Last edited:
God it's boring watching you repeat lies that have been refuted and debunked repeatedly. Requiring the jab to visit his home, when a cheek swab was a sufficient alternative as I just said and you just quoted?
The same narrative that was being pushed everywhere to drive people to get the jab so they didn't have to use the fake tests constantly and get their lives disrupted with the false positives.

Nit picking doesn't help you or him.
 
Back
Top