RFK Jr.'s 2024 POTUS campaign

https://twitter.com/WillFiteForYou/status/1672653658297716736
Here are @RobertKennedyJr’s statements from last night’s New Hampshire town hall regard the 2nd Amendment.

Some highlights:

- Reiterates he’s “not going to take anyone’s guns away”

- “Anyone who tells you that we can end the violence to our children that’s going on now by removing people’s guns, in the margin that has been left to us by this very expansive Supreme Court decision [Bruen] is not being truthful with you.”

- says the Bruen ruling legally makes it impossible to “do anything” regarding gun control

- says gun ownership is a huge cultural aspect to communities and saying you’re going to take them away just polarizes further.

- says NIH needs to research what psych drugs are doing to kids mentally

- points out school shootings are new phenomenon and that his school had a gun club growing up

- points out Switzerland has same amount of guns and haven’t had a school shooting in 21 years.

- “something has changed in this country. It’s not the guns, we’ve always had the guns.”
 
https://twitter.com/DennisPrattFree/status/1657898839527784451
zWPAy01.png


[...]

RFK Jr At Porcfest 2023! Cronyism's Control of DC: Covid, War, Climate with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
RFK Jr came to the Free State Project's annual Porcfest at Roger's Campground in Lancaster New Hampshire to give his pitch to Libertarians on why they should support him in the 2024 Presidential Election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KBhVwXOkSI


https://twitter.com/RAZ0RFIST/status/1673495698535501824
lD3kiMa.png
 
Sad thing is Liberals all take their marching orders and in the end there will probably be more conservatives that vote for RFK jr. than Liberals.

At this point, considering the privately run RNC and DNC, voting doesn't matter (those candidates are already hand-picked). But, it is important to get as many people as you can to listen to RFK, regardless of "party". Who knows, maybe someway, somehow, things can change(?).
 
RFK Town Hall | Part Of The Problem 1011
On this episode of Part Of The Problem Dave and Robbie take a look at RFK and his recent appearance on News Nation, taking part in a town hall and responding to some of the pushback against his stance on vaccine mandates.
https://rumble.com/v2xl777-rfk-town-hall-dave-smith-part-of-the-problem-1011.html
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
RFK Vs. Reason | Part Of The Problem 1015
On this episode of Part of The Problem, Dave and Robbie give their take on the new hit piece on RFK by Reason Magazine.
https://rumble.com/v30bktl-rfk-vs.-reason-dave-smith-part-of-the-problem-1015.html


The video/article in question:

RFK Jr.'s long con
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNeEyVYxvkY


Why Are So Many Libertarians Suddenly Fond of RFK Jr.?
The anti-vax environmental lawyer is not worthy of the rehabilitation tour he's getting from pundits and podcasters.
https://reason.com/video/2023/07/10/why-are-so-many-libertarians-suddenly-fond-of-rfk-jr/
Liz Wolfe (10 July 2023)

Children's Health Defense, a nonprofit that warns of the possible dangers posed by vaccines, used to receive a modest 119,000 monthly visits to its website. When COVID hit and public skepticism of the medical establishment exploded, the site's web traffic went wild, peaking at 5 million monthly visits.

Who's behind this group that warns of the alleged dangers of electromagnetic radiation and a "global cabal" attempting to ban meat? The group's chairman, chief legal counsel, and highest compensated officer is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who recently launched a longshot bid to become president of the United States.

RFK Jr. is not worthy of the rehabilitation tour he's getting from various pundits, podcasters, and tech luminaries. He pushes tabloid-quality "reporting" and he wildly extrapolates from little grains of truth. His and his organization, Children's Health Defense, give opponents of vaccine mandates and government overreach—like me—a bad name by lumping us together with science-denying anti-vaxxers.

Take the 2022 piece "​​Polio: Why Vaccines Are to Blame for Rising Number of Cases," where Children's Health Defense claimed that "cases have been on the rise globally since 2016, and the resurgence is related to the use of vaccines."

Actually, global polio cases fell by 99 percent from 1988 and 2022 and we're extremely close to eradicating the disease, thanks to vaccines. Kennedy's claim is technically true but misleading: He was referring to polio spread through untreated sewage by a form of the vaccine that uses live virus. Not only has that version of the vaccine been retired, but it can cause an outbreak only in unvaccinated communities, such as some Hasidic neighborhoods of New York City and outlying areas. In one ultra-orthodox community in Rockland County, a voluntary vaccine drive mostly solved the problem.

For the last 18 years, Kennedy has been a leading figure in the anti-vax movement.

"My principal objective is that vaccines and childhood vaccines are immune from pre-licensing safety testing," he has said. "Pharmaceutical drugs are now the third biggest killer in America after heart attacks and cancer. So, no, I do not intend to make it easier to get drugs to market."

This is a rhetorical ploy to make his vaccine fearmongering sound reasonable. The Food and Drug Administration is, if anything, overly cautious with vaccine testing: Bringing a vaccine to market generally takes 10–15 years and costs several billion dollars.

It's ridiculous to argue vaccines are insufficiently tested, or that kids today are overvaccinated.

"When I was a kid, I got three vaccines. My children got 72 doses of six vaccines," Kennedy has said.

He is playing fast and loose with the numbers: About 30 doses are on the childhood immunization schedule, with fewer required to attend most states' public schools. The reason he didn't get vaccines that prevent measles and mumps when he was a kid is that they didn't yet exist, which is a shame because they've mostly eradicated those serious diseases in the U.S.

"Beginning in 1989, we experienced a chronic disease epidemic in this country, and it is unlike anything in human history. I mean neurological diseases that I never saw when I was a kid—ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, ASD, autism, narcolepsy," Kennedy has said. "All these suddenly appeared. Autism rates went from one in 10,000 to one in every 34."

A major reason autism rates have gone up over the years is because we've gotten a lot better at diagnosing it.

There's never been an objective test for autism, and the criteria have changed dramatically since the 1940s, when the diagnosis was first introduced.

"Peanut allergies suddenly appeared, food allergies, eczema suddenly appeared. Anaphylaxis and asthma, which had been around, exploded," RFK added.

Kennedy is correct that food allergy, asthma, and childhood obesity rates are increasing, but there's no evidence it's caused by vaccines. He is once again flubbing the particulars in order to pin blame on a single culprit.

Kennedy frequently mistakes correlation for causation, gets his numbers wrong, and portrays complex trends as simpler than they really are, with easily identifiable villains.

Last year, he produced the documentary Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda. It was directed by Andrew Wakefield, the British doctor who wrote a 1998 article in The Lancet arguing that vaccines cause autism.

Kennedy has frequently pointed to thimerosal, a preservative that's mercury-based and was removed from vaccines out of an abundance of caution back in 1999, as the main culprit for increasing autism rates. But thimerosal has been removed from many childhood vaccines since then, and we haven't seen autism rates trend downward.

A measles outbreak in 2014–2015 and another in 2019 were caused by a drop in vaccination rates, which Wakefield and Kennedy helped stoke.

As for the film that Kennedy and Wakefield collaborated on, it recycles long-debunked myths from the '90s that tetanus vaccines administered in Kenya were deliberately laced with a hormone blocker that caused infertility.

This, they say, was part of the World Health Organization's depopulation plot, but the Catholic bishops who are the source for that claim never presented conclusive evidence.

Libertarians who understand the incompetence of government entities should be more skeptical that the World Health Organization would be so effective at carrying out such a nefarious scheme.

Kennedy has chaired Children's Health Defense for the last eight years, speaking at events all over the country on its behalf. He used his famous last name to add the veneer of respectability to the anti-vax cause.

In fact, he's been focused on this single issue for decades now: In 2005, he first became obsessed with the preservatives in vaccines, writing an article for Salon on the danger of vaccine additives that needed five corrections appended to it and was later retracted.

He's not really a persecuted truth-teller—although recent attempts to go after Joe Rogan for having him on his podcast, or to cut him out of public debate in other ways, have fed that impression. The real issue is that RFK Jr.'s bold claims don't hold up to scrutiny, even when examined by people who don't have a dog in the fight.

So what would RFK Jr. be like as president?

Part of his appeal, to libertarians at least, is that he's staunchly anti-war and a huge critic of COVID lockdowns and mandates.

But he's fundamentally a big-government liberal. He supports Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal. He favors heavy-handed government intrusion in the realm of environmental policy. He's against nuclear energy. He favors massive wealth redistribution, saying: "I don't think huge disparities in wealth are healthy for our country or healthy for democracy."

He also wants pharmaceutical companies to burn in hell, and he seems to believe in an almost Alex Jones–esque concept of the deep state. He correctly points out that government and big business have an unholy alliance, but he doesn't understand that too much regulation is the root cause. He just thinks large companies are inherently bad.

He says he's concerned about government spending, and he throws out wild figures to make his point: "We spent $16 trillion on the lockdown we wasted. Got nothing for it. $8 trillion on the Ukraine war. That's $24 trillion that they had to print to pay for nothing."

But he's no better than any establishment Republican or Democrat in his unwillingness to scale back the eldercare entitlements that are driving the federal government into bankruptcy. "I would say it's a red line for me to touch Social Security or Medicare or Medicare," he once said.

What's surreal about libertarians now embracing RFK Jr. is that he's publicly fantasized about jailing his political opponents and cracking down on free speech for years. At the People's Climate March in 2014, Kennedy said this: "They should be in jail. I think they should be enjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals who are there. Do I think the Koch brothers should be prosecuted for reckless endangerment? Absolutely."

And, more recently, he told Reason's Nick Gillespie this: "The First Amendment does not protect that. The First Amendment does not protect fraudulent speech. If you say something that is fraudulent, you're not protected." To which Gillespie responded: "It just seems like that way madness lies, because the government will always come up with a pretext for saying your speech is not just wrong, it's criminal, and you need to be shut down."

"Well, I don't know, but I do believe that prosecutors and judges make decisions about what's fraud all the time," countered RFK Jr.

He's not a real free speech advocate, and he's not especially thoughtful about the principles or people he endorses. After all, this is a man who once heaped praise on Hugo Chávez, touting the socialist dictator's bogus literacy programs and alleged commitment to democracy.

Is it fair to hold 15-year-old soundbites against RFK Jr., as some of his fans that I've sparred with have claimed? One thing I'll say for him is that, unlike most politicians, he's been extraordinarily consistent in his views. He thinks the world is divided into heroes and villains, and he makes wild, unsupported claims that portray things as simpler than they are.

The difference is that he's no longer a widely ignored crackpot environmental lawyer. He's asking you to vote him into the White House.
 
Last edited:
Why Are So Many Libertarians Suddenly Fond of RFK Jr.?
The anti-vax environmental lawyer is not worthy of the rehabilitation tour he's getting from pundits and podcasters.
https://reason.com/video/2023/07/10/why-are-so-many-libertarians-suddenly-fond-of-rfk-jr/
Liz Wolfe (10 July 2023)

[...]

A major reason autism rates have gone up over the years is because we've gotten a lot better at diagnosing it.

There's never been an objective test for autism, and the criteria have changed dramatically since the 1940s, when the diagnosis was first introduced.

[...]

If "there's never been an objective test for autism", then how the hell can you know that "we've gotten a lot better at diagnosing it"?

:rolleyes:

And for the record, I have no opinion on the "vaccines cause autism" issue, one way or the other - in part precisely because "there's never been an objective test for autism". ("You find what you look for" - and there are a hell of a lot of incentives to look for "autism".)
 
If "there's never been an objective test for autism", then how the hell can you know that "we've gotten a lot better at diagnosing it"?

:rolleyes:

And for the record, I have no opinion on the "vaccines cause autism" issue, one way or the other - in part precisely because "there's never been an objective test for autism". ("You find what you look for" - and there are a hell of a lot of incentives to look for "autism".)

Pretty sure most libertarians have autism , one of the few logical explanations for the crazy behaviour ,lol
 
Pretty sure most libertarians have autism , one of the few logical explanations for the crazy behaviour ,lol

These days, being "autistic" describes someone who is still capable of critical, independent thought and resistance to assimilation. Can't have that! Call Big Pharma stat! Gonna need a higher dose....
 
Not too much of a hit piece.

The discussion was more human, some of RFKs personal life, falconry etc.




 
Scott Horton's extensive take on RFK, Jr:

Some things I think about RFK:

First, nothing here is about whether he's a libertarian or whether libertarians should or should not support or vote for him. The guy's a Democrat. It's just interesting to me is all I'm really saying here.

And the way his Zionism has already creeped from disregarding the rights of the Palestinians to now also being bad on Iran as his great woke anti-racist signaling device is as the kids say completely cringe and for me a deal killer.

He's also said all kinds of left-wing stupid stuff on guns and corporate charters and other things dating back to before his campaign and also recently about signing an AR ban, etc.

So he ain't no Ron Paul. But he's pretty close to a Kucinich, Paul's old friend and antiwar colleague from the House who I think is a decent guy, and is his campaign manager.

As I always say, for example about Tucker Carlson, I don't need him to become a libertarian. I accept that most Americans will not. But I do need good antiwar conservatives out there to lead other good conservatives. Switch a few words out and the same things applies to Kennedy and liberals here.

And so I guess I'm just saying I'm preparing to be quite entertained by his run for the next year or so because:

He is absolutely great on Ukraine and the Cold War with Russia. As good as you could hope for. And that is by far the most important thing in the world. As a factual, quantitative matter, presuming human life matters at all: nothing is more important than America's relationship with Russia. Right now it's completely wreaked.

But between us we have about 14,000 H-bombs, with at least a couple thousand currently deployed. One US submarine could destroy all of Russia. But they have the dead hand so their computers would take revenge and kill us all too. Not that this is likely to happen, but it is far more likely now than it was just two years ago and this danger must be reverse immediately.

To have a chance to have a major party presidential candidate who understands this and whose dad made the deal with Khrushchev to end the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 is a big deal.

Especially when the rest of his party is so bad on it I could puke blood and they are going to want to find a way to barbecue him for that too, which should be a great opportunity for him to tell the truth about it more.

(I know he doesn't want conflict with China, though I don't know what he has to say about Taiwan. But the spirit of detente would be a good start.)

I think that the legacy of the anti-Vietnam and anti-Iraq war movement still lives among American liberals, progressives and leftists, if they have good leadership reminding them that peace is what's important. I consider it RFK's mandate to revive the voters and 2005 Democratic Party's at least professed views on war. Instead of being Pelosis, they should mean it this time.

But let's face it. Joe Biden is very old and getting very older. It's unanimous that Harris cannot be the candidate. The establishment's best shots are Whitmer and Newsome. They both have major baggage, especially their records on the lockdowns – so many fled California they lost a Congressman! First net loss in population since the Spanish arrived 500 years ago.

And this is Kennedy's strongest issue.

And what's funny and ironic is that the establishment media thinks it's his weakest. He did step in shit speculating the other day, but otherwise I think he can mostly run circles around his critics on it.

And I don't know how long it will take, but at some point the TV media and their sponsors are going to realize that they are giving his so-called "anti-vax" views much greater prominence than they ever had, and that their attacks on him about it will very quickly have very diminished returns.

They can keep insisting he's a kook, but he doesn't really sound like one. He wrote a 600 page book about it and can cite all kinds of studies off the top of his head.

Remember a few weeks ago, ABC just completely cut a major part out of his interview, obviously because he had completely bodied the anchor lady they sent out there to get him.


I saw his speech at Porcfest and heard his case that the US intelligence agencies knew the germ had escaped the lab by September 2019 and that they spent months preparing the censorship regime for it and all. I did not have all his footnotes, but his accusations were specific enough that it sounded alot more like journalism than trutherism. If he can tighten that argument up to a couple of minutes and really convince people to at least go see his site where he demonstrates it or something like that, I think it could be a major political earthquake. This is an issue that effected every person and family in the country. I found it compelling.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7KBhVwXOkSI

He's also really good on censorship, #Bitcoin, electronic spying and some other things. He has a great rap about the dangers shown by the closing of the bank accounts of people involved in the great trucker protest in Canada and how such things can never be allowed.

You can tell he knows about and cares about things in a much more regular-human kind of way, as opposed to the normal lizard-person psychopath who usually runs for office.

It's true too that the Republican Party has an interest in promoting him, like inviting him to the hearing today. Which is fine and will mostly help him.

Again, the guy clearly does not align with us 100%, maybe not even 50%.

But he is a truth-teller, at least best he can tell, making him much more Kucinich than an Obama – the best I can tell. And that counts for a hell of a lot.

And unlike our great hero Dr. Paul, who was relatively unknown when he started his 2008 run, Kennedy is a Kennedy. And not some side-issue Schriver type. He's Bobby Kennedy Jr. Charismatic, ladies like him, surely soon on the grocery store National Enquirer and People magazine-type level. They won't be able to undo that.

Also, that judge in Missouri just put an injunction on the government's role in the internet censorship regime, which will really hurt the war party's attempt to crush him.

TV is already insisting that "oh he's just cynically exploiting the fact that we all know his name!" but that's just because they can already see that it does indeed provide him a huge advantage. Their crying about it doesn't undo it. Tough.

Just the fact that he's a throwback to a time before the evil murderers Bill and Hillary Clinton took over the Democratic Party, when they thought it mattered to pretend to give a shit about the American people at all, is kinda nice.

The thought of him and Trump running a campaign through the summer of 2024 fighting over whose going to end the war first and better while all the TV news ladies cry about it is even better.

Have to wonder whether the FBI counterintelligence division and CIA are working together to frame him for treason with the Kremlin already or if they're going to wait another few months to get started.

What do yall think about him?

https://twitter.com/scotthortonshow/status/1682062897898307588
 
Scott Horton's extensive take on RFK, Jr:
[...]

And I don't know how long it will take, but at some point the TV media and their sponsors are going to realize that they are giving his so-called "anti-vax" views much greater prominence than they ever had, and that their attacks on him about it will very quickly have very diminished returns.

[...]
https://twitter.com/scotthortonshow/status/1682062897898307588

I'll bet they don't.

And even if they do, they'll just keep doing it.

They simply won't be able to help themselves.
 
I'll bet they don't.

And even if they do, they'll just keep doing it.

They simply won't be able to help themselves.

This.

Blackouts worked in 2008 when you didn't have a bunch of loud-mouth millennials running the studio.

But it is 2023, and the media world is full of complainers and the easily-offended, and they will not pass up an opportunity to make sure the whole world knows they're full of opinions and feelings. They have created monsters.
 
Back
Top