Results from Kentucky

rp007

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
14
I posted this info in the Kentucky forum but am resposting here because I think this observations should be considered universally....

In summary, the Fayette County convention was a fiasco. It was literally Ron Paul supporters vs absolute zombies of the Republican party. If we would have had 10-20 more RP supporters, we would have dominated the convention. But no, we were just short of the majority. This led to many, many "altercations" on votes, resolutions, nominations, etc. 120 attended.

Lessons learned:

1. We should not have announced our support for Ron Paul. We gained nothing by this. The intent was good, but the strategy failed. The old line Republicans got pissed off and actually ended up voting against us rather than against or for the idea. One example of this is a resolution that we tried to pass stressing limited government. It was actually voted down! That's right people, a Republican convention voted DOWN a resolution stressing limited government. They did this because the whole ordeal became an us against them mentality.

2. We came across as whiners. We objected way too freaking much. Some of those objections were absolutely justified, however we pressed too much. Instead of accepting the failure of a vote and immediately calling for another resolution or vote, we objected. This pissed everybody off and hurt our cause. How do I know this? I had a couple of non-Ron Paul supporters at the Convention who were very sympathetic to us and the movement (in the begining). By the time it was over, they detested the Ron Paul movement.

3. The establishment are idiots. I mean this in the most sincere way possible. I almost threw up listening to the resolutions/business that were being presented. A nation of sheep would sum up the entire ordeal. There were periods when I thought I was in a psychology experiment where they had infiltrated the convention with robots. To reiterate, the sheep voted DOWN a resolution for limited government. They then voted to END the presentation of resolutions because they were so pissed about the Ron Paul supporters presenting them.

4. We know who NOT to vote for. There were candidates there begging for our vote. Mostly for representatives and council members. This was very much like attending your middle school class elections. No wait, my middle school class elections contained more substance. Thank you to the candidate running based on Mccain's POW experience. I have no idea how Mccain's experience apples to you, but you were the most entertaining candidate of the whole bunch. I will make sure your opponent has my vote.

5. This goes back to #1 above. We should NOT have represented Ron Paul overtly. We should have represented the core Republican values. I think we would have had our resolutions passed if this had not turned into a Ron Paul vs the establishment debate. This is a lesson learned and MUST be applied for the District/State conventions. If we had the majority, this would not be a problem. We did not have the majority however, so we must remember to NOT do this in future conventions.

In summary, a lot of people supported our ideas in the beginning. They supported them because they are the core Republican values. The failure came when we represented a candidate overtly that has not won the primaries and has not garnered positive attention by the media. The old school Republicans rejected this an
 
The old school Republicans rejected this and did not trust us. Hindsite is 20/20, but we MUST adapt and learn from this mistake. We must covertly represent Ron Paul in the future by overtly supporting the Republican core values.
 
This is a very very important post, I hope that more people read this and comment. If we have to make gains covertly, than we make gains covertly.

The Missouri thread is a perfect example of how this movement can absolutely continue to make a difference NOW, and not in 2 years.

Come on people, we have so many more contests. Let's learn and move forward!
 
Great post rp007. Very insightful. We need to sneak into these conventions like ninjas at night by leaving our beloved Ron Paul pins at home to apply stealth tactics. :)
 
How was the limited government worded? You can't just say "We want limited government" and not go into details. That will (rightfully so) get voted against every time. Come on...this is not high school politics. You have to be very specific about things if you expect them to pass.
 
My experience in my small county was quite different, but if 20 RP supporters had shown up and introduced resolutions like the ones shared elsewhere on this board, the almost 30 old guard members would've voted them down on principle. The principle being, for them, that it is their county and their party. The mindset is different. I think a point to be taken from rp007's experience/post is that we need to work with the party members already there as much as we can; an adversarial/competitive relationship will not promote the advances we want. If we are going to change and affect the party, we have to work with these people more than just once every four years. If our voices and perspectives are perceived to be adversarial for whatever reason, our influence will be limited. The whole process is about more than just delegates at the district level, state level, or the RNC. Maybe it's kind of like canvassing -- we gotta work personally with people. What we desire is good for everyone, and they need to see that. In fact, it's the foundation of the Republican party.

dp
 
How was the limited government worded? You can't just say "We want limited government" and not go into details. That will (rightfully so) get voted against every time. Come on...this is not high school politics. You have to be very specific about things if you expect them to pass.

It was devastatingly specific. The resolution called for the abolition of the Dept. of Education, Dept of Agriculture, FDA, and several other agencies. Joe Republican regected it and gushed with joy when a resolution supporting Mccain was presented.
 
Any delegates from the 6th district need to P.M. me on an urgent matter.

Don't ignore this, I'm serious. If you are in the 6th district and you are delegate, please PM me.
 
Patrickdsg is writing a detailed account of what happend tonight. Stay tuned.
 
My experience in my small county was quite different, but if 20 RP supporters had shown up and introduced resolutions like the ones shared elsewhere on this board, the almost 30 old guard members would've voted them down on principle. The principle being, for them, that it is their county and their party. The mindset is different. I think a point to be taken from rp007's experience/post is that we need to work with the party members already there as much as we can; an adversarial/competitive relationship will not promote the advances we want. If we are going to change and affect the party, we have to work with these people more than just once every four years. If our voices and perspectives are perceived to be adversarial for whatever reason, our influence will be limited. The whole process is about more than just delegates at the district level, state level, or the RNC. Maybe it's kind of like canvassing -- we gotta work personally with people. What we desire is good for everyone, and they need to see that. In fact, it's the foundation of the Republican party.

dp

There is a lot to learn from the post above.

The principle being, for them, that it is their county and their party.

A lot of this is about psychology. People, even though we are staunch individuals, find comfort in the group. When a Senator calls me and tells me about a forum he's holding in my city and invites me to be part of the group, I feel warm'n fuzzy until I realize how we're of the same party and I vehemently disagree with him.

These party insiders feel warm and fuzzy because the higher-ups shower praise and love on them. They do NOT think for themselves.

If we have big enough groups, and represent the future of the party while at the same time demonstrating BEDROCK Republican principles, we can pick a lot of these people off.

I am so impressed with Derdy in that he conceded some spots to those people. Extending the olive branch is a SHREWD and NECESSARY move at this point in the Ron Paul movement. He will end up bringing in MANY more people when they spend time understanding Ron Paul's positions.
 
Cowlesy
This is a very very important post, I hope that more people read this and comment. If we have to make gains covertly, than we make gains covertly

derby had a great idea. His Ron Paul group called they slate Conservative Values.

One of the strategies we came up with last night, much to late to implement, is since they knew we were coming we would have one of our Ron Paul supporters go to the caucus and have a Ron Paul slate, but it just be one guy, sitting all alone. Then you have the "Conservative Values" slate where everyone is signing up! That would leave the GOP scratching their heads!!

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showpost.php?p=1352109&postcount=58
 
I thought we decided LONG AGO that we weren't going to show up supporting Dr. Paul, but rather a set of platform principles. Why do we keep hearing reports of people showing up to caucuses in RP tee shirts, etc?!?

We need to get it together, and fast if we are gonna win this thing.
 
Back
Top