Republicans Captured A Higher Percentage Of Hispanic Voters In Midterms Than Trump Did In 2016

[jmdrake]

Irrelevant.


It isn't a self fulfilling prophecy to point out facts already in evidence, it is beyond foolish to allow in millions of people who vote communist by an overwhelming margin in the hope that one day they might vote Republican.

Straw man argument.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Straw man argument.

LOL

 

[Zippyjuan]

Trust is earned, it is beyond foolish to allow in millions of people who vote communist by an overwhelming margin in the hope that one day they might vote Republican.

The Demoncrats grew by importing communists.

Commie is so 1950's. But seems to be your "go to". That and "RHINOs". Means you ran out of arguments.

 

[jmdrake]

LOL

You're laughing because you don't know what a straw man argument is.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You're laughing because you don't know what a straw man argument is.

I'm laughing because you don't.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Commie is so 1950's. But seems to be your "go to". That and "RHINOs". Means you ran out of arguments.

LOL

You are pathetic.

 

[jmdrake]

I'm laughing because you don't.

Let's see. I said nothing about letting in millions of immigrants from Venezuela or anywhere else yet you used that in your rebuttal. Classic straw man argument. Build up an argument your opponent didn't make and try to tear it down.

 

[Zippyjuan]

LOL

You are pathetic.

Another very convincing argument you raise. Do go on.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Let's see. I said nothing about letting in millions of immigrants from Venezuela or anywhere else yet you used that in your rebuttal. Classic straw man argument. Build up an argument your opponent didn't make and try to tear it down.

You used the classic and failed argument that they don't vote for us because we want to limit immigration, the alternative is supposed to be that we throw our borders wide open and then they will vote Republican, that is ridiculous as I already explained.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Another very convincing argument you raise. Do go on.

You don't deserve anything better as your posts in this thread show.

 

[jmdrake]

You used the classic and failed argument that they don't vote for us because we want to limit immigration

Bullshyt. I said no such thing. You can limit immigration without being an asswipe about it. Case in point all of the hand wringing in the thread about the immigrant politician who happened to be a democrat. "OMG! They're going to make us all socialist!" Total hyperbole which ignored immigrant politicians from the other side of the spectrum.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Let's see. I said nothing about letting in millions of immigrants from Venezuela or anywhere else yet you used that in your rebuttal. Classic straw man argument. Build up an argument your opponent didn't make and try to tear it down.

The "let's hate all the immigrants" rhetoric hurts the very immigrants that try to come the GOP way (i.e. Marie Love) and becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

...

 

[Zippyjuan]

You used the classic and failed argument that they don't vote for us because we want to limit immigration, the alternative is supposed to be that we throw our borders wide open and then they will vote Republican, that is ridiculous as I already explained.

You make the erroneous assumption that somebody against stopping every single person from entering the country favors letting in anybody who wants to come. Ron Paul is not for open borders but opposes Trump's wall as well as some of his other proposals.

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc.../01/why-do-we-need-a-national-security-state/

Given President Trump’s impulsive decision to suddenly send 5,200 armed US soldiers to the US-Mexico border to prevent a few thousand women and children and others from seeking refugee status in the United States, which foreign citizens are entitled to do under US law, a question naturally arises with respect to those troops: What were they doing before they were sent to the border?

The answer is: Nothing, at least nothing productive.

The biggest mistake the United States ever made was to convert the US government from a limited-government republic into a national-security state. The Founding Fathers and the Framers had it right. The best thing that the American people could ever do is dismantle their national-security state governmental structure and restore a limited-government republic to our land. That would naturally entail the dismantling, not the reform, of the NSA, CIA, Pentagon, and what former President Eisenhower labeled the military-industrial-congressional complex.

 

[jmdrake]

...

You know you just proved that you were doing a straw man argument right? "Let's hate all immigrants rhetoric" != limit the number of immigrants that come in.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Bullshyt. I said no such thing.

That is the only way to interpret what you said, since I didn't say "Hate all Immigrants" then you must have used that as hyperbola when referring to my insistence that we control immigration.

You can limit immigration without being an asswipe about it. Case in point all of the hand wringing in the thread about the immigrant politician who happened to be a democrat. "OMG! They're going to make us all socialist!" Total hyperbole which ignored immigrant politicians from the other side of the spectrum.

They vote overwhelmingly Demoncrat and if we don't stop the flood they will turn us into a communist country.

A handful of exceptions doesn't change that.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You know you just proved that you were doing a straw man argument right? "Let's hate all immigrants rhetoric" != limit the number of immigrants that come in.

I proved that you were using a strawman, nobody said "Let's hate all immigrants", you just made it up.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You make the erroneous assumption that somebody against stopping every single person from entering the country favors letting in anybody who wants to come. Ron Paul is not for open borders but opposes Trump's wall as well as some of his other proposals.

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc.../01/why-do-we-need-a-national-security-state/

Another strawman.

 

[Zippyjuan]

I proved that you were using a strawman, nobody said "Let's hate all immigrants", you just made it up.

True, you don't mind those who promise they will vote the same way you do.

They vote overwhelmingly Demoncrat and if we don't stop the flood they will turn us into a communist country.

But what if they lied? Should party loyalty be a requirement to becoming a resident and a citizen? Are differing viewpoints to be banned for those who would like to come here? What if those in power enacted such laws- and your view turned out to be the one now outlawed?

Who would you be willing to let in?

 

[Swordsmyth]

True, you don't mind those who promise they will vote the same way you do. But what if they lied? Should party loyalty be a requirement to becoming a resident and a citizen? Are differing viewpoints to be banned for those who would like to come here? What if those in power enacted such laws- and your view turned out to be the one now outlawed?

Who would you be willing to let in?

I have always said that immigration should be limited by number so that assimilation can take place because philosophical restrictions aren't possible.

If philosophical restrictions were possible we could let in far more immigrants, there is no possible moral objection to choosing who we allow to join the group based on them sharing the founding principles of the group.

 

[TheCount]

That would make a great joke tweet for DJTvsg to post.

It would resonate well with dannno and anyone else who still thinks that it's October, 2016.