Report: Trump ’95 Percent’ Likely to Tap Mike Pence as VP (wtf??)

[jllundqu]

From that to this:




Told ya:

 

[kahless]

From that to this:

Told ya:

Trump supporters were making allot of noise against Pence pick in hopes the campaign would listen. This certainly hurts Trump and the trust level. However when weighed against Hillary and the issues I listed there is not much of choice. It sucks.

No one here has made a good reason otherwise why I should not hold my nose and vote for him considering the reasoning I posted above.

btw - I suppose if Rand had made it this far no doubt we probably would be bitching about his choice to placate the establishment to.

 

[Bryan]

To all those who jumped on the Trump bandwagon, it is official! You're fucking stupid! Congratulations.

As others have said, be nice. Also, this type of rhetoric proves nothing, has no intellectual value, just drives people into a bigger divide, degrades the level of discourse of the site and often leads to retaliation name calling and more. This isn't what we want. We appreciate your help in elevating the site discourse and thus supporting our mission of liberty.

As we are right on the issues (including not supporting Trump) we can use solid arguments and not rely on name calling.

Thanks.

 

[CPUd]

Rand would have a larger pool of candidates willing to be on the ticket, including women, but would still likely be someone considered "establishment" or "neocon" by most on RPFs.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Show me another candidate who is against the TPP, NAFTA, the overrun of our borders by illegal aliens, and the importation of inadequately vetted "refugees" and I will consider voting for him/her.

Please list them. Thanks.

 

[Ender]

Trump supporters were making allot of noise against Pence pick in hopes the campaign would listen. This certainly hurts Trump and the trust level. However when weighed against Hillary and the issues I listed there is not much of choice. It sucks.

No one here has made a good reason otherwise why I should not hold my nose and vote for him considering the reasoning I posted above.

btw - I suppose if Rand had made it this far no doubt we probably would be bitching about his choice to placate the establishment to.

Possible- but at least we'd have RAND.

 

[acptulsa]

...we...

That's a cute mouse in your pocket, there.

 

[William Tell]

Show me another candidate who is against the TPP, NAFTA, the overrun of our borders by illegal aliens, and the importation of inadequately vetted "refugees" and I will consider voting for him/her.

Please list them. Thanks.

Darrell Castle. Pence is against you on a lot of those things, maybe all.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

As others have said, be nice. Also, this type of rhetoric proves nothing, has no intellectual value, just drives people into a bigger divide, degrades the level of discourse of the site and often leads to retaliation name calling and more. This isn't what we want. We appreciate your help in elevating the site discourse and thus supporting our mission of liberty.

As we are right on the issues (including not supporting Trump) we can use solid arguments and not rely on name calling.

Thanks.

You have an ad on the bottom of your website supposing that Trump is fighting for my gun rights. Your moderator, brian4fascism, has been pimping Trump for a while now. Forgive me for being blunt (this Trump fever of crassness is really rubbing off!) but this site is a joke and your words aren't received nearly as they once would have been.

They can organize and whore for a candidate that will destroy freedom furthering debt and a police state and what, I'm the asshole for not being polite? They're Trump supporters, this is a Trump website.... I thought you guys were all cool and un-pc and what not?

He can make fun of the reporter or whatever the fuck, yet when I rightly call a Trump supporter either an authoritarian or a retard and suddenly people get offended.

 

[francisco]

...we...

That's a cute mouse in your pocket, there.

Sounds collectivist to me

 

[acptulsa]

Sounds collectivist to me

Doesn't it, though?

 

[undergroundrr]

You have an ad on the bottom of your website supposing that Trump is fighting for my gun rights. Your moderator, brian4fascism, has been pimping Trump for a while now. Forgive me for being blunt (this Trump fever of crassness is really rubbing off!) but this site is a joke and your words aren't received nearly as they once would have been.

They can organize and whore for a candidate that will destroy freedom furthering debt and a police state and what, I'm the $#@! for not being polite? They're Trump supporters, this is a Trump website.... I thought you guys were all cool and un-pc and what not?

He can make fun of the reporter or whatever the $#@!, yet when I rightly call a Trump supporter either an authoritarian or a retard and suddenly people get offended.

+rep

 

[Bryan]

You have an ad on the bottom of your website supposing that Trump is fighting for my gun rights.

Those are 3rd party ads, we don't fully control them. If people compain about one we can block it.

Of course never mind the top banner that is anti Trump.

Your moderator, brian4fascism,

Lay off the name calling.

has been pimping Trump for a while now.

Have you reported a case?

Forgive me for being blunt (this Trump fever of crassness is really rubbing off!) but this site is a joke and your words aren't received nearly as they once would have been.

I'm open to constructive criticism but this is just non functional insults.

They can organize and whore for a candidate that will destroy freedom furthering debt

No they can't. Report cases if you see it.

They're Trump supporters, this is a Trump website....

Which is why we have an anti Trump header and gave him a F as a candidate.

He can make fun of the reporter or whatever the fuck, yet when I rightly call a Trump supporter either an authoritarian or a retard and suddenly people get offended.

Who said anything about being offended?

 

[bunklocoempire]

Bleed that campaign.

I want more Trump ads on this site. Please.

 

[Bryan]

Sounds collectivist to me

Hope this helps:

This isn't what we want. = Site Staff

We appreciate your help in elevating the site discourse and thus supporting our mission of liberty. = Site Staff

As we are right on the issues (including not supporting Trump) we can use solid arguments and not rely on name calling. = Me and the poster, and anyone else not supporting Trump.

 

[Bryan]

Bleed that campaign.

I want more Trump ads on this site. Please.

We blocked Rand ads so he wouldn't waste money here.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Darrell Castle. Pence is against you on a lot of those things, maybe all.

Yah, I can't stand Pence. I hope Trump doesn't choose either Gingrich or Pence.

 

[acptulsa]

Show me another candidate who is against the TPP, NAFTA, the overrun of our borders by illegal aliens, and the importation of inadequately vetted "refugees" and I will consider voting for him/her.

Please list them. Thanks.

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.730916

 

[nikcers]

we don't fully control them.

I can somewhat understand the sentiment, seeing Trump content is revolting and offensive. Trumps main supporters focus on subversion and jiggery pokery to fool us into thinking he is the next best thing. They post stuff about Trump and insinuate he is a liberty guy, and try to equate him to Rand Paul/RonPaul which for a lot of people that helped support their campaigns is insulting because it poisons the well. If liberty is a song that we all want to sing, the Trump supporters are constantly claiming Trump sings that same song, but we all know Trump's song is the pied piper.

 

[Ender]

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.730916

Well, at least he's better looking than the choices we currently have going for us.