Report: Trump ’95 Percent’ Likely to Tap Mike Pence as VP (wtf??)

To all those who jumped on the Trump bandwagon, it is official! You're $#@!ing stupid! Congratulations.

you should try being nice, like this.

Hey man, you know that guy who is the opposite of Rand Paul he is probably going to be Trumps VP pick, at the very least Trump said that he would make a good vp. How could that be liberty at all, how is Chris Christie anything like Ron Paul??
 
you should try being nice, like this.

Hey man, you know that guy who is the opposite of Rand Paul he is probably going to be Trumps VP pick, at the very least Trump said that he would make a good vp. How could that be liberty at all, how is Chris Christie anything like Ron Paul??
Paying their social security checks is nice enough of me. Authoritarians deserve nothing more than scorn. And let's face it, how goddamn dumb do you have to be to think Donald Trump is even remotely promoting liberty? I mean, come on. If Donald Trump has made it fashionable to be un-pc then that is the only thing he has done. And in that spirit, his followers are quite frankly, by and large, retarded.
 
And let's face it, how goddamn dumb do you have to be to think Donald Trump is even remotely promoting liberty?

Donald Trump "supporters" recognize that Trump promotes liberty by opposing (and hopefully) disrupting certain key elements of the diabolical agenda of the enslavers (at least that's been my argument ever since Rand dropped). Sadly, most don't recognize the "agenda" and consequently view those who do as "goddamn dumb".
 
Donald Trump "supporters" recognize that Trump promotes liberty by opposing (and hopefully) disrupting certain key elements of the diabolical agenda of the enslavers (at least that's been my argument ever since Rand dropped). Sadly, most don't recognize the "agenda" and consequently view those who do as "goddamn dumb".
Disrupting, how? Appointing Mike Pence, Chris Christie, or Newt Gingrich as VP? Appointing Giuliani as DHS head? Bringing the worst of the worst CFR stooges onto his team? Promoting another war?

You might understand why some of the less goddamn stupid of us might have some reservations.

Since when did opposing free markets, agitating war, and promoting criminal government insiders to key policy positions equal promoting Liberty?

It's a brave new world, comrade. Il Douche will make the country great again.
 

Original CFR publication laying out the strategy and argument of feasibility here:

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2006-03-01/rise-us-nuclear-primacy

^ subscription required, free full text here:

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dpress/docs/Press_Rise_US_Nuclear_Primacy_FA.pdf

Good article further expounding on the issue here:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/06/indications-u-s-planning-nuclear-attack-russia.html

Also, see current geopolitical events confirming everything above. (hint: avoid US MSM to get a clearer picture)
 
Either the Washington Times is trying again to spread misinformation to destroy Trump or Trump is trying to drive away his base of support to give Hillary the win. Pence basically gives the finger to the American worker on trade and supported all the globalist trade agreements.

This could be final straw that broke the camels back in supporting Trump for allot of his supporters including myself.
Well.....
 
Either the Washington Times is trying again to spread misinformation to destroy Trump or Trump is trying to drive away his base of support to give Hillary the win. Pence basically gives the finger to the American worker on trade and supported all the globalist trade agreements.

This could be final straw that broke the camels back in supporting Trump for allot of his supporters including myself.

Report: Trump ’95 Percent’ Likely to Tap Mike Pence as VP
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/11/report-2/

So what's the verdict? Will you still be supporting this globalist anti-liberty candidate?
 
Well.....

Who am I kidding. Disappointed but it could have been allot worse I suppose. See below.

So what's the verdict? Will you still be supporting this globalist anti-liberty candidate?

Globalist is a real stretch of a label when you compared to establishment candidates. If you are basing that on foreign policy, considering Rand's statements on FP would you call him a globalist to?

For me supreme court nominations, trade and immigration, I do not have much of choice. There is no taking the country back after 4-8 years of Hillary. The country is too far gone with 8 years of Obama. So this is different from prior cycles for me where I usually vote for the Constitution Party, LP candidate or writing in Ron Paul.
 
Globalist is a real stretch of a label when you compared to establishment candidates. If you are basing that on foreign policy, considering Rand's statements on FP would you call him a globalist to?

You were the one who called him supporter of globalism in the post @jllundqu quoted.
 
I Trump has no prior record on policy other than his statements these last few years combined with is flip flops from years past. So we are taking his word that he is sincere in his policy positions posted on his website.

Therefore his VP pick in this case is extremely telling and important whether he is actually sincere on his policy positions and not as some here say legislate as an establishment politician once in office.

From that to this:

Globalist is a real stretch of a label when you compared to establishment candidates. If you are basing that on foreign policy, considering Rand's statements on FP would you call him a globalist to?

For me supreme court nominations, trade and immigration, I do not have much of choice. There is no taking the country back after 4-8 years of Hillary. The country is too far gone with 8 years of Obama. So this is different from prior cycles for me where I usually vote for the Constitution Party, LP candidate or writing in Ron Paul.


Told ya:

Report: 100% chance that Trump supporters will find a way to reconcile whoever the eventual choice is with their own preconceived notions of what Trump actually stands for.
 
Who am I kidding. Disappointed but it could have been allot worse I suppose. See below.



Globalist is a real stretch of a label when you compared to establishment candidates. If you are basing that on foreign policy, considering Rand's statements on FP would you call him a globalist to?

For me supreme court nominations, trade and immigration, I do not have much of choice. There is no taking the country back after 4-8 years of Hillary. The country is too far gone with 8 years of Obama. So this is different from prior cycles for me where I usually vote for the Constitution Party, LP candidate or writing in Ron Paul.

Fair enough and each to his own
 
Back
Top