Jack Bauer
Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
- Messages
- 911
Rep. Steve King says he may endorse Romney or Santorum to hurt Ron
- Thread starter bluesc
- Start date
Feeding the Abscess
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 8,340
"He personally told me he'd bring all the troops home!"
You and billions around the world, you scum-sucking loser.
Also, parallels between him using the "he personally told me" and Bachmann using that line about Sorenson. Are we sure King and Bachmann aren't the same person?
You and billions around the world, you scum-sucking loser.
Also, parallels between him using the "he personally told me" and Bachmann using that line about Sorenson. Are we sure King and Bachmann aren't the same person?
Last edited:
specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
Its a shame, as earlier on he said he wouldn't endorse between Bachmann and Paul. Turns out none of thes guys are anything but a bunch of power hungry wimps.
Tax the Fed
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 406
Maybe it be time to put the bigger hurt on Steve King !
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
I hadn't thought of that. He might be using Ron as an 'excuse' to win favors from what he perceives as the winning team. Because his endorsement is NOT going to make evangelicals go to Romney. Santorum, maybe.
- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,303
there was a segment on MSNBC today about how people are starting to coalesce around Romney because they don't want Ron Paul to win Iowa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtYEEe25t6I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtYEEe25t6I
Last edited:
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
they are pretending that is the meme. The ESTABLISHMENT hacks, sure. The Gingrich guys who wanted an insider. But there is an insider/outsider race, and Ron is the only outsider with a ground game in 50 states.
robert9712000
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2008
- Messages
- 726
These people have mental problems,they sound like the whole worlds out to get them.Isnt that a sign of paranoid schizophrenic.
This is a good sign as to who people think is really ahead.
No one has been attacked as much or as viciously in the last two weeks as Ron Paul. It's because they view him as the front-runner. This will continue until caucus night, just as it did to Huckabee two years ago. And I don't think Iowans are going to fall for it this late in the game.
It's funny how they're trying to change the issues of focus from the economy/spending- which is THE issue realm that Iowans have stated time and again they care about this time around- to foreign policy.
No one has been attacked as much or as viciously in the last two weeks as Ron Paul. It's because they view him as the front-runner. This will continue until caucus night, just as it did to Huckabee two years ago. And I don't think Iowans are going to fall for it this late in the game.
It's funny how they're trying to change the issues of focus from the economy/spending- which is THE issue realm that Iowans have stated time and again they care about this time around- to foreign policy.
I wonder what the founders would say if they heard that kind of crap? The world was just find before we invaded it, and it will continue to thrive without our presence. By continuously making enemies throughout the world, our nation security is always going to be threatened. We are sewing the seeds of our own destruction because we keep starting wars, putting sanctions on others, and occupy sovereign lands in the name of providing quick fixes to our problems of today.
Sometimes, as I look at pictures of children whose parents just got killed by our troops due to a simple case of mistaken identity, their bodies covered in dirt and blood, and with crying faces so horrific it should make the stomach of any decent person churn, I think to myself, "Will those kids become the terrorists of tomorrow? Will they seek revenge for their parents and other lost loves?"
As Americans, we tend to forget about the humanity of others, especially if it's considered unpatriotic to do so. Yet, for those of us on these forums, we easily see that it's due to our interventions of yesterday that we suffer these problems of today. If we respond through more intervening, orphaning children, imposing sanctions on countries that have not proved to be a threat to our nation, and treating the world like a massive chess board, then the generations of tomorrow will find themselves in similar situations and will be forced to ask if they want to repeat our mistakes, or to correct them through adherence to the Constitution.
I, for one, would like to see an America with a strong national defense, a symbolic leader to look up to, and with a future that looks bright and clear, provided we haven't already nurtured a new generation of terrorists just waiting to grow a bit older. If you don't endorse Ron Paul for president, you're basically saying that you want your kids, or grandkids, to suffer more terrorist attacks, the likes of which can only be tempered through a full-blown police state.
America is on a dangerous path. Our foreign policy is directly tied to our economic prosperity, our freedom, and our future.
Sometimes, as I look at pictures of children whose parents just got killed by our troops due to a simple case of mistaken identity, their bodies covered in dirt and blood, and with crying faces so horrific it should make the stomach of any decent person churn, I think to myself, "Will those kids become the terrorists of tomorrow? Will they seek revenge for their parents and other lost loves?"
As Americans, we tend to forget about the humanity of others, especially if it's considered unpatriotic to do so. Yet, for those of us on these forums, we easily see that it's due to our interventions of yesterday that we suffer these problems of today. If we respond through more intervening, orphaning children, imposing sanctions on countries that have not proved to be a threat to our nation, and treating the world like a massive chess board, then the generations of tomorrow will find themselves in similar situations and will be forced to ask if they want to repeat our mistakes, or to correct them through adherence to the Constitution.
I, for one, would like to see an America with a strong national defense, a symbolic leader to look up to, and with a future that looks bright and clear, provided we haven't already nurtured a new generation of terrorists just waiting to grow a bit older. If you don't endorse Ron Paul for president, you're basically saying that you want your kids, or grandkids, to suffer more terrorist attacks, the likes of which can only be tempered through a full-blown police state.
America is on a dangerous path. Our foreign policy is directly tied to our economic prosperity, our freedom, and our future.
enjerth
Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2007
- Messages
- 1,399
Holy sh ---- are they saying that the race is between Paul and Not Paul? It's not about Romney or Not Romney any more.
The people are no longer buying the idea that he's unelectable. Now they're saying we don't want him elected. We have the upper hand.
Saweeet.
Will it soon be time to switch back to an "educational" campaign to convert those who say they don't want him elected?
GeorgiaAvenger
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,945
No Bachmann?
Sola_Fide
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2010
- Messages
- 31,482
Similar threads
