torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
if we could control all the bots from one central server and mitt's kitten's rate of bot-ing stays constant, yes
Last edited:
RED ALERT! Romney is Slaughtering Dr Paul in the NPR poll! LAST DAY TO VOTE!
- Thread starter Dripping Rain
- Start date
if we could control all the bots from one central server and mitt's kitten's rate of bot-ing stays constant, yes
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
Wow. Great news! We are going to win this round by tens of thousands of votes!! We are going to win an online voting competition by having our computers generate many more votes per second than those who are doing the same for Mitt Romney!!! This is a fantastic display of democracy!!!
/sarcasm
And then come election time, those same people spamming are going to be crying about the Diebold machines.
This poll has shown less our strength on the internet than it has our hypocrisy.
/sarcasm
And then come election time, those same people spamming are going to be crying about the Diebold machines.
This poll has shown less our strength on the internet than it has our hypocrisy.
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
Wow. Great news! We are going to win this round by tens of thousands of votes!! We are going to win an online voting competition by having our computers generate many more votes per second than those who are doing the same for Mitt Romney!!! This is a fantastic display of democracy!!!
/sarcasm
And then come election time, those same people spamming are going to be crying about the Diebold machines.
This poll has shown less our strength on the internet than it has our hypocrisy.
that is correct. we don't want democracy. it doesn't work. neither does diebold or any other form of digital polling.
We just proved the point.
Now go back to your corner and begin self-flagellation for our sins.
specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
And then come election time, those same people spamming are going to be crying about the Diebold machines.
This poll has shown less our strength on the internet than it has our hypocrisy.
Not really. We are simply proving the absurdity of online polling and computer-controlled/counted polling in general. If anything we are proving that you can't trust diebold machines or any non-paper ballot verifiable results.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
What is it that bothers you? Perhaps you can show us the light, torchbearer.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
Oh, so now this is an educational mission?
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
In politics, you don't get brownie points for losing fairly.
If you feel guilt, whip yourself.
coyote_sprit
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 4,148
Wow. Great news! We are going to win this round by tens of thousands of votes!! We are going to win an online voting competition by having our computers generate many more votes per second than those who are doing the same for Mitt Romney!!! This is a fantastic display of democracy!!!
/sarcasm
And then come election time, those same people spamming are going to be crying about the Diebold machines.
This poll has shown less our strength on the internet than it has our hypocrisy.
We are just stuffing a predict the outcome, Diebold stuffs the actual outcome. Big difference.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
Please, shine some more rays of truth on us, torchbearer.
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
How can we time it? No one knows what time exactly the poll ends tomorrow.
I'm gonna starting voting here again soon to slow down this small Romney surge (Paul down from 71% to 66%.)
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
I've said the same thing twice.. the second time was the dumbed down version for you.
I can't get it any more basic than that without trying to translate it into grunts.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
So your ends justify your means? At what are the ends in the case of this poll? The means, we already know...
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
Paul winning can only be a good thing.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
Paul winning this poll by deceit will make us liars and cheaters. That is not a good thing.
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
each person has their own ends.
Speaking only for myself-
ends...
to win the poll and show its invalid.
I'm hoping the next round has macro protection so I can prove both of those points.
TER
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17,946
This I can definitely agree with.
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
You can only fight honorable, when facing an honorable opponent.
You act like we just cheat for the hell of it.
You wouldn't have liked the founding fathers. When they took the field of battle, they didn't fight "fair" either. Gentlemen fight in rows and columns. The founders were honorless cowards who hid behind trees.
You would have loathed them. Such dishonor.
specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
If that is what it takes to get you off, sure. For me it is more about entertainment, and given that NPR created this little game for entertainment purposes I'd say that is a good enough reason.
specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
I'm hoping they go ahead and disqualify all duplicate IP votes, then announce the results; with RP still winning of course.
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
I was actually thinking about this too.
The whole reason we could out macro them is because we had more people to begin with.
The outcome of this poll is not changed by the macros really... because we still out number them.