Randsplaining Black Lives Matter

Oh, dear lord.

Removed my Rand comic, happy LibertyEagle? You guys are really uptight about this subforum.

EDIT: Ah! screw it. Even my attempt to explain the moral of the comic is probably across the line with LE
 
Last edited:
also

Here's a different idiot's take on it:

RAND PAUL ‘WILLING TO MEET’ WITH BLACK LIVES MATTER
by LEE STRANAHAN 25 Aug 201520

GOP Presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
was critical of Black Lives Matter’s recent microphone-grabbing direct actions against politicians but indicated he’d be willing to meet with the group in a civil forum.

The comments came in an interview with Seattle TV station KING 5, and Paul’s answers indicate a naiveté about Black Lives Matter*that is common among politicians, who treat the group as if it’s a legitimate political organization that can be reasoned with, instead of the revolutionary,*radical Marxist, anti-police movement that the group’s founders have made it repeatedly made clear that it is.

Paul put a libertarian/property rights spin on the argument that*Black Lives Matter shouldn’t take others microphones, telling KING:
Do I think it’s a good idea for people to jump up and commandeer the microphone? No, and I wouldn’t let them take my microphone. You know things cost money, and they need to learn that things cost money, and really all lives matter. Someone said that the other day, and then they had to apologize, and it’s like ‘Really? You’re apologizing because you said all lives matter.?’

Paul then pivots in an attempt to find common ground with Black Lives Matter, which makes the assumption that the group is simply concerned about police overreach.

This is the common whitewashing of*Black Lives Matter and it ignores the fact that the group pays homage to a wanted Marxist terrorist at every event, has recently chanted “burn everything down!”, have inserted themselves in valid police actions*and was instrumental*in inciting*riots and unrest in Baltimore and Ferguson.

Meanwhile, politicians such as Rand Paul treat the group as a benign force, as these comments indicate:
But I think there are some grievances, and I think the drug war has disproportionately affected black individuals, and I’d be willing to meet with them anytime; I’d be willing to sit and have a forum with them.

Paul finishes his thoughts on*Black Lives Matter with a common sense call for civility, but but appears to be unaware that the mic grabbing tactics of*Black Lives Matter aren’t forgetful lapses in manners or mere ignorance of social etiquette: they are “direct actions” that a core part of the group’s activist philosophy. Paul told KING:
I’ve been to 10 criminal justice forums that include many African Americans talking about all these same things, but we do it in a civil way. We don’t get up there and grab someone’s microphone and yell at them. And they’re getting attention, but I don’t know if they’re making a good point.

For*Black Lives Matter, the attention IS the point. Like the*Occupy Wall Street movement that preceded it, it’s the only way they make headline and have any impact at all.

In fact, the Seattle TV station asking Rand Paul about*Black Lives Matter in the first place shows that the group’s tactics*are working just fine.

The choice of topics news outlet selects to*ask a candidate about is a tip off. It’s the first journalistic choice a reporter makes.

Asking about*Black Lives Matter instead asking about Benghazi or Hillary’s email server*or Planned Parenthood sets the table for what a candidate will say.

000.breitbart.c0m/big-government/2015/08/25/rand-paul-willing-to-meet-with-black-lives-matter

(Shouldn't this thread go in Spin, Chaff & Flak?)
 
I apologize if this off topic...feel free to move it over.
It will be interesting if they show up at one of his rallies, though.
 
Here's a different idiot's take on it:
(Shouldn't this thread go in Spin, Chaff & Flak?)

Probably, but he is pretty new here so he probably doesn't go in there. I don't like going in there either, on this subject though Rand needs to do a better job explaining his positions when he gets asked these questions. He isn't going to convince people to stop hating, he just need to expose the hate for what it is. It goes both ways, I saw a different spin on breitbart that he got criticized for agreeing to meet with them. (hxtp://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/25/rand-paul-willing-to-meet-with-black-lives-matter/ )
 
The link to Rand's presentation at Howard was in that link. That's cool. I've never listened to it before.

 
I apologize if this off topic...feel free to move it over.
It will be interesting if they show up at one of his rallies, though.

I hope they do--as long as they send someone able and willing to ask questions and listen to the answers.
 
telling KING:
Do I think it’s a good idea for people to jump up and commandeer the microphone? No, and I wouldn’t let them take my microphone.

I predict some dumbass is going to take that as a challenge.
 
Probably, which is why Rand should probably have a security detail to handle potential dumb asses. If Trump can use a brute to deal with a disruptive reporter, why now.
As a U.S. senator, does he get any kind of security? In Frankfort on Saturday his SUV had a KSP escort.
 
As a U.S. senator, does he get any kind of security? In Frankfort on Saturday his SUV had a KSP escort.
Now that I think about it, I don't think Rand's supporters would allow it. Bernie's folks kind of sat back and took it.
 
Now that I think about it, I don't think Rand's supporters would allow it. Bernie's folks kind of sat back and took it.

I hope that everyone reading this will keep in mind that the best thing to do if this happens would be to take them in hand, say into the microphone, 'By my count you just asked (three, four, whatever) questions of our man. Now you're going to stand right here and listen to the answers before you blather any more.'
 
Back
Top