Rand: Trump is the best foreign policy president we’ve had in a generation

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737






Rand Paul

@RandPaul


Trump’s willingness to negotiate is one of the reasons he is the best foreign policy president we’ve had in a generation.Iran foreign minister will have indirect talks with US envoy over nuclear program - ABC News

Code:
https://x.com/RandPaul/status/1909624877495046252

 
You're just pleased as punch to see your cuckgod damned with incredibly faint praise, aren't you?

Best foreign policy of a millennium that began with a false flag op that killed thousands of Americans in pursuit of a foreign policy of multiple wars. Gee, whiz.
 
You're just pleased as punch to see your cuckgod damned with incredibly faint praise, aren't you?

Best foreign policy of a millennium that began with a false flag op that killed thousands of Americans in pursuit of a foreign policy of multiple wars. Gee, whiz.
A generation goes back a bit farther.

And you just can't stand that Rand is admitting the truth here that Trump is the best thing available and a good first step.
 
A generation goes back a bit farther.

You think 25 year olds can't have babies? What do you think a generation is?

And he's not the best available. He's the best we can get brainwashed hypocrites to nominate in between booing the Golden Rule.
 
You think 25 year olds can't have babies? What do you think a generation is?

And he's not the best available. He's the best we can get brainwashed hypocrites to nominate in between booing the Golden Rule.
A generation is a human lifespan for most conversational purposes.
And Trump is the best on foreign policy since Eisenhower at least, very possibly since Coolidge.
 
A generation is a human lifespan for most conversational purposes.

You brainwashed moron, you just called baby boomers, GenX, GenZ and Millennials a single group. You either don't even know what "generation" means or you think nobody has babies until they're old enough to be great grandparents.

Nobody creates the next generation until they're about to die. Pro tip, shithead: Look up "menopause". Why do you insist on contradicting people first and thinking about what you just heard only when you've already made an ass of yourself again? It's as self-humiliating as it is toxic.

You pull brain dead crap like this out of your ass whenever convenient and you expect us to take your hero worship bullshit seriously? Drop dead, neocon-worshipping ignoramus.

"Most conversational purposes". Your only "conversational purpose" is making shit up, trying to brainwash people with it, and abusing anyone who doesn't play yes man to your garbage. Just like a white woman. You want to spew lies and la-la land fantasy, and be told, yes dear, you're always right even when you're dead wrong. News flash, dearie--you ain't that cute.

No wonder you want to stand me up against a wall and shoot me. Easier than living in reality, is it?
 
Last edited:
You brainwashed moron, you just called baby boomers, GenX, GenZ and Millennials a single group. You either don't even know what "generation" means or you think nobody has babies until they're old enough to be great grandparents.

Nobody creates the next generation until they're about to die. Pro tip, shithead: Look up "menopause". Why do you insist on contradicting people first and thinking about what you just heard only when you've already made an ass of yourself again? It's as self-humiliating as it is toxic.

You pull brain dead crap like this out of your ass whenever convenient and you expect us to take your hero worship bullshit seriously? Drop dead, neocon-worshipping ignoramus.

"Most conversational purposes". Your only "conversational purpose" is making shit up, trying to brainwash people with it, and abusing anyone who doesn't play yes man to your garbage.
Yes, a generation is sometimes used that way when discussing different age groups.
But not when discussing "the greatest X in a generation".

And it doesn't really matter which way Rand was using it, because he still said he's the best in a generation and that is a reason to support him as a move in the right direction, it's also undeniable that I am right about him being the best since Eisenhower or beyond whether Rand was thinking that or not.

You are just looking to vent your TDS even when Rand is praising Trump.
 
Shut off the bullshit tap, moron. Nobody's buying.



Always. When it comes to that, you always find reality deniable.
Why are you so mad?

Rand does it right- he acknowledged what Trump is doing good while he still fights for what he thinks can be done better = credibility.

You are over here getting bent out of shape because why exactly? For once we don’t have a shadow government pulling the strings in lieu of the elected president. Is that not a great step in the right direction?
 
You are over here getting bent out of shape because why exactly?

You mean besides the head forum neocon telling me to vote Republican in lockstep or get stood up against the wall and shot? I guess you didn't see that thread.

For once we don’t have a shadow government pulling the strings in lieu of the elected president.

Then why is Netanyahu calling all the shots? You're dreaming, and all of you come here to do it then get mad when you get told you're dreaming. And then when our attitude becomes proactive y'all play these victim cards like progs. "Why are you irritated? All we did was redefine words the same way progs do, deny history and threaten your life. What do you expect from a bunch of partisans getting betrayed by our party yet again?"
 
Last edited:
You mean besides the head forum neocon telling me to vote Republican in lockstep or get stood up against the wall and shot? I guess you didn't see that thread.
I warned you what the left and globalists would do if they win and impose globalism using free trade and all the other things like keeping the invaders from being deported etc.

But you just have to lie about everything.
 
Your post in its entirety:

Libertarians who own stocks think they will continue to be in the ruling class and benefit from our slavery when "free trade" has reduced us to the same level as Chinese slaves.
They will be the first against the wall when the coup is complete.

You didn't give the slightest indication that you were speaking for anyone but yourself and I don't believe that's what you were doing, wannabe tyrant.

FFS, you spend all day every day bragging about how much winning Trump and you brownshirts are doing, and now you're telling me you were talking about somebody else's coup? And you can't deny that you people are in the midst of pulling off a coup, and know it. Yes, Biden was completely unacceptable and had to go, but it's your faction that thinks the Constitution is some kind of impediment to that goal.

Besides, there's no way you ever admit we'd be the first against the wall if there was a leftist coup. You're too busy pretending to yourself that you're their biggest threats, and we're their useful idiots.

I'm calling it. Bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Your post in its entirety:



You didn't give the slightest indication that you were speaking for anyone but yourself and I don't believe that's what you were doing, wannabe tyrant.

FFS, you spend all day every day bragging about how much winning Trump and you brownshirts are doing, and now you're telling me you were talking about somebody else's coup? And you can't deny that you people are in the midst of pulling off a coup, and know it. Yes, Biden was completely unacceptable and had to go, but it's your faction that thinks the Constitution is some kind of impediment to that goal.

Besides, there's no way you ever admit we'd be the first against the wall if there was a leftist coup. You're too busy pretending to yourself that you're their biggest threats, and we're their useful idiots.

I'm calling it. Bullshit.
Learn to read, the antagonist the libertarians think they will be immune to are the people reducing us to slaves using free trade.
If we are reduced to slaves (the predicate for my prediction) then it is they who will be putting useful idiots up against the wall first.

Nowhere did I say anything about what would happen if real patriots take over.
 
Learn to read

Learn how to communicate, if that's what you really had in mind when you wrote the opposite.

Learn how to think, if you think we're not slaves to Israel.

I'm not impressed by your desperate ex post facto spin.
 
Learn how to communicate, if that's what you really had in mind when you wrote the opposite.

Learn how to think, if you think we're not slaves to Israel.

I'm not impressed by your desperate ex post facto spin.
LOL

Gaslighting and inversion only make you look stupid.

I was clear who I was talking about, and the context of the debate over free trade made it even clearer.
 
You can dislocate your arm patting yourself on the back, and it won't change anything. Funny how resistant you are to that particular fact of life.

This fact is also undeniable: Rand Paul said Trump was the best on foreign policy since approximately 9/11. Sadly, I agree. He's a very, very long way from good, but not as far as we have been in recent decades. But we're going to need a lot more moral courage than he's showing with WWIII looming. We're going to need more than the little bone they're throwing us.
 
Last edited:
You mean besides the head forum neocon telling me to vote Republican in lockstep or get stood up against the wall and shot? I guess you didn't see that thread.



Then why is Netanyahu calling all the shots? You're dreaming, and all of you come here to do it then get mad when you get told you're dreaming. And then when our attitude becomes proactive y'all play these victim cards like progs. "Why are you irritated? All we did was redefine words the same way progs do, deny history and threaten your life. What do you expect from a bunch of partisans getting betrayed by our party yet again?"
Wait a minute, you can’t sit there and claim they Netanyahu is calling all the shots and rest your case. I do not believe that is the case at all- such an allegation would need to be backed up with facts. And they would be a game changer for me- because I don’t worship Israel like some do.

I just simply don’t believe that to be the case however, based on what I see with my own eyes. I see a president who ran on issues popular with the American people, executing those exact campaign promises.

I’m sure that there is some influence from Israel on foreign policy in the Middle East, but that is not the same as “calling all the shots.”
 
Wait a minute, you can’t sit there and claim they Netanyahu is calling all the shots and rest your case.

We're beating up Yemen and helping kill everything still moving in Gaza. That's a strong case.

I just simply don’t believe that to be the case however, based on what I see with my own eyes. I see a president who ran on issues popular with the American people, executing those exact campaign promises.


You think this is all Trump's idea because he's talking about doing the gentrification personally? You think Trump GazaPlaza is the new American dream? Is that really what you wanted? Face it. MAGA has become Miriam Adelson's Goals Achieved. The only reason Rand doesn't count off for that is he's grading on a curve when he says, best in a generation. That's been the rule for a generation. There has been no exception.
 
We're beating up Yemen and helping kill everything still moving in Gaza. That's a strong case.




You think this is all Trump's idea because he's talking about doing the gentrification personally? You think Trump GazaPlaza is the new American dream? Is that really what you wanted? Face it. MAGA has become Miriam Adelson's Goals Achieved. The only reason Rand doesn't count off for that is he's grading on a curve when he says, best in a generation. That's been the rule for a generation. There has been no exception.
I’m not in favor of any of my money being spent in Gaza. I don’t really know if I’m qualified to speak about whether the Yemen stuff is a justified use of American forces. I’m more inclined to believe that military actions should have a congressional declaration of war behind them. Apparently there are loopholes.

But you still haven’t even remotely demonstrated how anyone other than Trump is responsible for those decisions. I conceded that there may be some influence from Israel about Middle East policy, but that’s not the entire Trump administration in a nutshell. There’s plenty to talk about what he is doing here at home which as far as I can see is exactly what he’s been talking about doing for as long as I remember caring anything about what he said. You see, I have come to believe that Trump is acting in what he believes is America’s best interest. Your argument is that Netanyahu is calling all the shots so Trump is in fact doing all this in Israel’s best interest. That’s an interesting argument, but not one that I will buy without some serious evidence in front of me.
 
Biggest takeaway: A (one) generation, about 25 years. Bush Jr, Obama, Trump himself.

but we hope for the best
 
Back
Top