Rand pulled out too early

cindy25

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
6,817
he should have stayed at least thru mid-March, if not to win then to educate. he has no race yet in Kentucky, and national attention is needed on some issues.

One example is draft registration, which Rubio, Christie, and Bush all support (Bush 41 did not in 1980, when male registration was an issue, neither did St. Reagan)

now is the perfect time to abolish this for men and women.
 
He didn't make the next debate and chances are he wouldn't make any of the rest, either. So, any national attention was not going to be much of anything.
 
He didn't make the next debate and chances are he wouldn't make any of the rest, either. So, any national attention was not going to be much of anything.

true enough, but what about the appearances on Hannity and Kelley shows, on CNN and MSNBC? these are now lost
 
he should have stayed at least thru mid-March, if not to win then to educate. he has no race yet in Kentucky, and national attention is needed on some issues.

One example is draft registration, which Rubio, Christie, and Bush all support (Bush 41 did not in 1980, when male registration was an issue, neither did St. Reagan)

now is the perfect time to abolish this for men and women.
I have an idea that may just propel him to the top...I will put the plan in order and post....he has suspended the campaign so far
 
He didn't make the next debate and chances are he wouldn't make any of the rest, either. So, any national attention was not going to be much of anything.

How do we know that? He pulled out before the debate list was made. And considering he finished in Iowa ahead of Christie, Kasich and Jeb he could have raised hell over why they were allowed to debate and he wasn't. Besides, both he and Trump got more coverage by skipping a debate and doing their own events.

The irony is that while Rand got less votes than his dad, we are closer to the ephemeral "brokered convention" that we were hoping for in 2008 and 2012. A brokered conventions is almost a surety at this point. Trump is going to hold steady at 30%. Cruz will hold steady at 30%. The rest of the field continue to fight with Rubio for the establishment vote.
 
The viability of the whole campaign hinged on getting a top finish in IOWA, not on continuing to get in the debates. When IA went bust for him, and he was not qualifying for the next debate, there was no reasonable pathway left for winning. Rand appeared to think that all those cable news interviews and debate appearances were a substitute for building up an actual winning coalition within the GOP rank and file.

The campaign never seriously went after attracting religious conservatives, populists, the anti-establishment vote, and at least some fraction of the older Republicans who actually vote. He (and we) concentrated on doubling down with only depending on a mystery youth electorate who were historically known to not show up at crunch time---who again reliably, at crunch time this year, did not show up. Rand wisely pulled the plug at the right time, as the liberty movement (like Luke Skywalker) needs to vanish at this time, to figure out a better plan to beat the statist Sith Lords.
 
The small chance of him being in a debate wouldn't have been worth it. Remember, there are people working for him who need to find new jobs if the campaign isn't going anywhere--it wouldn't be right to string them along. It also wouldn't be right to string his solid supporters along.

I was surprised that Rand announced so soon, but I trust what he did was for the best.
 
People keep saying Rand didn't qualify for the next debate. But I haven't seen any evidence of that. How does the 5th place finisher not qualify for the debate but the 6th, 7th and 8th place finishers qualify? (Jeb, Christie, Kasich)
 
I have an idea that may just propel him to the top...I will put the plan in order and post....he has suspended the campaign so far

The current tone around here has my sarcasm meter borked. I honestly cant tell if this is a serious post.
 
People keep saying Rand didn't qualify for the next debate. But I haven't seen any evidence of that. How does the 5th place finisher not qualify for the debate but the 6th, 7th and 8th place finishers qualify? (Jeb, Christie, Kasich)

Because they only accept the top 3 from Iowa, and the rest are based on NH and national polling averages.

Yes they are prioritizing polls over primary voting results. Carly didn't make the cut, and is arguing everyone who won at least 1 delegate deserves to be included, but they haven't changed their minds to my knowledge.
 
The small chance of him being in a debate wouldn't have been worth it. Remember, there are people working for him who need to find new jobs if the campaign isn't going anywhere--it wouldn't be right to string them along. It also wouldn't be right to string his solid supporters along.

I was surprised that Rand announced so soon, but I trust what he did was for the best.

Agree.

And if Rand stayed in longer, there would inevitably be the complaints that "Rand stayed in too long" and "he just stayed in so that Rand Inc. could rip us off!"
 
Back
Top