Rand Paul is 'In it to Win it!'

[Brian4Liberty]

Rand Paul is 'In it to Win it!'

 

[Xenliad]

He said that he's had 150,000 donors.

 

[CPUd]

He said that he's had 150,000 donors.

It might be closer to 200,000 now. I haven't done plots in a while, but still collecting data.

 

[Jackie Moon]

It's funny that Rand's been using "In it to win it" because in 2012 the campaign decided not to adopt that name after it was chosen here for the money bomb.

I guess we were just 4 years too early.

It also gets the song I used for this crappy video stuck in my head. I recorded that from a local band's Myspace page by holding my laptop mic up to another computer's speaker, lol.

 

[nasaal]

Right.

 

[cindy25]

he has to start attacking Rubio. and forget Trump. let the establishment do their own hit job.

 

[Crashland]

he has to start attacking Rubio. and forget Trump. let the establishment do their own hit job.

I think he needs to not single out people to attack. Attack them all as a group, or rather attack their stupid ideas. Rand is very different from the rest of them, he needs to showcase that more forcefully.

 

[nikcers]

We should rick roll the media, tell them that he is dropping out and then post videos on social media edited in the form of never going to give you up.

 

[PRB]

just like his dad, when you say you'll win, you'll always win, that's how life works!

 

[Liberty74]

I think he needs to not single out people to attack. Attack them all as a group, or rather attack their stupid ideas. Rand is very different from the rest of them, he needs to showcase that more forcefully.

Yes Rand does need to be more forceful and bold IMO but Rand has yet to take an issue or issues and make it his. He's on the right side of the issues but dances around it in an attempt not to upset the establishment. Want to end the war on drugs? Don't just say you support medical pot. Say you own your body and you have a right to your body. Get all philosophical on those dip shits on stage while keeping the argument logical. Want to be more cautious going to war. Become the bring the troops home President and say we need to defend our borders for once. Rand is letting everyone else define him. Heck, the media is still saying Rand needs to drop out. A coworker came up to me at work saying Fox said Rand wasn't going to be in the next debate.

I really do like the idea of Rand holding a press conference saying he is going to drop out. Have the MSM show up but not Rand - JOKES on you! Implying they don't get to control the narrative.

 

[CPUd]

Yes Rand does need to be more forceful and bold IMO but Rand has yet to take an issue or issues and make it his. He's on the right side of the issues but dances around it in an attempt not to upset the establishment. Want to end the war on drugs? Don't just say you support medical pot. Say you own your body and you have a right to your body. Get all philosophical on those dip shits on stage while keeping the argument logical. Want to be more cautious going to war. Become the bring the troops home President and say we need to defend our borders for once. Rand is letting everyone else define him. Heck, the media is still saying Rand needs to drop out. A coworker came up to me at work saying Fox said Rand wasn't going to be in the next debate.

I really do like the idea of Rand holding a press conference saying he is going to drop out. Have the MSM show up but not Rand - JOKES on you! Implying they don't get to control the narrative.

If he says that, he will be asked if he's pro-choice, a big no for a GOP primary if he says he is. If he says he's not, he will be accused of inconsistent philosophy. It is exactly why candidates do not expand on divisive topics unless they have to.

 

[RickyJ]

The question is what is he attempting to win? Right now he better concentrate on his Senate seat, because there is a real chance he could lose it.

 

[CPUd]

The question is what is he attempting to win? Right now he better concentrate on his Senate seat, because there is a real chance he could lose it.

Whatever Democrat they put up will get crushed, there is no primary challenger who could raise $20M it would take to beat him. His seat in KY is safe.

 

[Feelgood]

How many times and in how many different interviews will he have to say this before the narrative begins to sink in?

 

[philipped]

WE'RE NO STRANGERS TO LOVEEEEEEEE!!!!!



YOU KNOW THE RULESSSS AND SO DO I!!!!

 

[mhad]

Why doesn't he also mention the margin of error with these polls? Everyone except top two are essentially even with margin of error.