- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,304
What's wrong with meeting with Bundy? I don't understand???
Rand is definitely becoming more of a politician. Rand needs to stop dodging the libertarian question. The interviewer gave him room to give a legitimate answer. He could have easily said that the word libertarian is misinterpreted and discussed how his views of libertarianism are really conservative
Uhh he came off as a racist? He used the N word? Rand is trying to get more minorities involved in the GOP and hopefully libertarianism?
In Bundy's day "negro" was the common parlance for black people, not "African American". .
He said "negro", I guess that counts as the "n" word? Here is the video:
In Bundy's day "negro" was the common parlance for black people, not "African American". If you listen carefully to what he's trying to say, he's basically saying that government welfare created a situation for black people almost as bad, if not WORSE than slavery. By destroying the black family.
Listening to the video and his full remarks, it is very VERY clear that he isn't a racist. He's just a gruff old man that doesn't know quite how to articulate himself, and isn't up to date on all the modern PC terminology.
This is an example of the ravenous anti-logical unhinged destructiveness of social justice warriors and the PC movement. Blowing everything out of proportion, turning logic on it's head and coloring the world in a racist light by manufacturing evidence, deliberately taking statements out of context, and flat out ignoring statistical data that challenges their world view.
Like are you 80 or do you not realize how offensive calling someone "colored people is"? Do you not realize how offensive calling someone "the negro is"? It doesn't matter what he said. That's offensive as fuck by any standard and it's not some PC social justice warrior bs. If he's some backwards retard that can't get with the times, he will look like a racist. If you don't get what he said, you don't understand race relations.
Years ago, it wasn't offensive though. Why don't you try and understand rather than placing false labels on someone? You're trying to turn him into something he isn't.
Years ago, it wasn't offensive though. Why don't you try and understand rather than placing false labels on someone? You're trying to turn him into something he isn't.
Rand is definitely becoming more of a politician. Rand needs to stop dodging the libertarian question. The interviewer gave him room to give a legitimate answer.
That was a strange interview. Rand seemed like he was being very careful about everything he said and didn't answer the questions directly. So, he did talk to Bundy. It was not a 'meeting'. Bundy came to a rally and went up to talk to him and they engaged in a conversation regarding public land. He is being careful because the msm is portraying Bundy as a racist nut job. Rand was really suspicious about the motives of this interviewer...does the guy have a reputation for setting people up?
Rand needs to stay as far away from the "libertarian" label as possible. He isn't in favor of holding a gun to someone's head and forcing them to bake a cake for a same sex wedding.
He said "negro", I guess that counts as the "n" word? Here is the video:
In Bundy's day "negro" was the common parlance for black people, not "African American". If you listen carefully to what he's trying to say, he's basically saying that government welfare created a situation for black people almost as bad, if not WORSE than slavery. By destroying the black family.
Listening to the video and his full remarks, it is very VERY clear that he isn't a racist. He's just a gruff old man that doesn't know quite how to articulate himself, and isn't up to date on all the modern PC terminology.
This is an example of the ravenous anti-logical unhinged destructiveness of social justice warriors and the PC movement. Blowing everything out of proportion, turning logic on it's head and coloring the world in a racist light by manufacturing evidence, deliberately taking statements out of context, and flat out ignoring statistical data that challenges their world view.
Decades ago it wasn't as offensive, but it was always offensive. Now, it is. I'm not turning him into anything. He did it to himself.
I was talking to an older black woman the other day and she was describing to me a musician whose name he was trying to remember, and she said "you know, he's a Caucasian man...".
So am I supposed to be offended that she said the word "Caucasian" in my face?