Rand Paul Explains Why He Would Not Pardon Edward Snowden

Thor

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
2,160
Surprised this has not been posted yet...

http://truthinmedia.com/rand-paul-pardon-snowden/



GOP presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul said on Friday that he would not pardon NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, and would instead seek a compromise that involved Snowden serving some jail time.

During a convention of the Republican Liberty Caucus in Nashua, New Hampshire, Paul was asked if he would pardon Edward Snowden, who is currently in Russia and reportedly contemplating a return to the U.S.

Snowden is facing felony charges for leaking documents that revealed the U.S. government is spying on innocent Americans and collecting their phone records using the NSA’s mass surveillance program.

Paul, who has rallied against the NSA’s program on several occasions, said that while he partially wants to pardon Snowden, he also believes that the country has to have a set of rules that cannot be broken.

I know most people would want me to say yes, and part of me says yes, and part of me says that we cannot have no rules. So for example, we do have secrets, maybe too many, but we do have secrets that need to be protected. We have operatives who try to risk their lives to defend our country and you know, he didn’t reveal that, but you don’t want people to reveal things like that.


Paul noted that Snowden did reveal a program that was not known to the American people before, and that might have stayed under the radar, due to the Obama administration’s treatment of whistleblowers.

“He revealed a program that we probably would have never known about, had he not revealed it because the government was lying,” Paul said. “So in many ways you could call him a whistleblower.”

Paul said he believes the U.S. should come to a compromise with Snowden, in which he serves some sort of a sentence that is “reasonable and negotiated.”

I think the best compromise on it is that there would be some penalty. But the people who are going nuts, which includes half of the people in our party, wanting to execute him, shoot him, chop his head off, all of these crazy stuff, they are completely wrong, and I think there could be some accommodation. And I think he would actually serve some sentence, if it were reasonable and negotiated.


In an interview with BBC that aired Monday, Snowden said that he is willing to serve jail time in order to return to the U.S. “I’ve volunteered to go to prison with the government many times,” Snowden said. “What I won’t do is I won’t serve as a deterrent to people trying to do the right thing in difficult situations.”

There has yet to be a presidential candidate who has said that he or she would pardon Snowden, pending his return to the U.S.

Carly Fiorina described Snowden as “terribly destructive,” Ben Carson said that Snowden “did our nation a tremendous amount of damage” and should be punished, and Donald Trump said that Snowden is a “traitor” and should be killed.

Is Rand just lesser of all the evils?
 
These kind of threads serve absolutely no useful purpose at all. What exactly do people expect to accomplish by refusing to support the most libertarian Senator in the race just because he isn't "pure enough?" I could care less what he wants to do with Snowden as long as he wants to end the NSA program, which he does.
 
Of course Rand would say that during primary season, I would bet that by January 2017, Rand would govern much more libertarian than he campaigns. Ron did the same in 08 and 12, if he had said that he was a voluntaryist, the headlines would have read "Could our next president be an Anarchist?"
 
I agree there is some "playing the game" going on, but it is hard to decipher it all, all the time. And Snowden is a hero, plain and simple.
 
within this context, yes.

lets consider. "But the people who are going nuts, which includes half of the people in our party, wanting to execute him, shoot him, chop his head off, all of these crazy stuff"

and then we have this.

"Carly Fiorina described Snowden as “terribly destructive,” Ben Carson said that Snowden “did our nation a tremendous amount of damage” and should be punished, and Donald Trump said that Snowden is a “traitor” and should be killed."

as it just so happens, these people are leading. in the "polls" by a wide margin. (in fact they ARE the top leaders)

I do not think that Rand has thrown us under the bus.
he is simply swimming in a moral cesspool. :)
 
Not the answer that encourages me to send money to him. Or become a streetwalker.

I'd have liked..."I encourage Edward Snowden to return to the U.S. and stand trial. I would like nothing more than that in this case. Only if I were the president of the U.S. I wouldn't wish it under the Obama administration, the current administration that prosecutes harshly those who only want to expose the truth.
"
 
These kind of threads serve absolutely no useful purpose at all. What exactly do people expect to accomplish by refusing to support the most libertarian Senator in the race just because he isn't "pure enough?" I could care less what he wants to do with Snowden as long as he wants to end the NSA program, which he does.

No useful purpose for what? I tend to watch politics so that I am informed. If not I'd probably endorse Sanders or Trump.
 
Not the answer that encourages me to send money to him. Or become a streetwalker.

I'd have liked..."I encourage Edward Snowden to return to the U.S. and stand trial. I would like nothing more than that in this case. Only if I were the president of the U.S. I wouldn't wish it under the Obama administration, the current administration that prosecutes harshly those who only want to expose the truth.
"

OK, ya got me on that one..:o
 
I agree with Rand and Snowden himself. He should serve a slap on the wrist sentence to preserve the rule of law. Lawbreaker notwithstanding, Edward Snowden is an American hero and patriot.
 
maybe the solution would be to pardon both Snowden and the purjuror James Clapper. and throw in all those convicted of stupid things, such as Denesh D'Souza, Bob McDondonell, Jesse Jackson Jr. even give the neo-cons Scooter Libby.
 
Rand is right. A republic is a nation of laws, and laws that are allowed to be broken by a few are not laws. I think the unspoken message here is that the government is also in the wrong but that's another story for another day. If Edward Snowden himself has been willing to accept some punishment as Rand suggested then how could anyone who supports Snowden actually disagree with Rand? They just said the same thing ....
 
Divide and conquer. Methinks Ted Cruz wants to capitalize on the divisions is the movement. Keep him out like a door to door missionary.
 
No useful purpose for getting Rand elected President, which should be the goal of every liberty minded person.

Sorry. Rand's basically saying that without a trial he is passing judgement. No thanks. I don't want that from the head of the executive branch.
 
i think the reason the knee-jerk to rand's response is we all tend to think "treason and death penalty"...but Rand has already said neither of those should apply.
 
Back
Top