Rand Paul Confronted on Mitt Romney Endorsement by wearechange

[green73]

Sure. And it's rude. You're point?

Sure. If it was any other pol I'm sure you'd be on the side of the reporter.

 

[LibertyEagle]

So it wasn't about Rand being too busy to talk; it was about the nature of the questions. I'll say it again: Ron would never blow somebody off like that.

How can you say that when he has already been on the record being quite forthcoming about it?

 

[wongster41]

Sure it is. She wanted to keep talking to Ron about the newsletters and he was done talking about it. WAC wanted to talk to Rand about Bilderberg and endorsing Perry and Rand was done talking about it. Now we know good and well that Rand knows about the Bilderberg group. So there are two possibilities. 1) He's trying to infiltrate the GOP and appeal to mainstream GOP voters in order to move the liberty movement forward ask Ron asked him to or 2) He's sold out to the "enemy". Either way there's no way he would answer that question. Now, I don't know if WAC is secretly working with Rand to distance him from the conspiracy movement by going after him like they go after everyone else. If they are then good acting on their part and Rand's part. If they aren't in on this with Rand then they are pretty stupid. Imagine when Nathan Hale was spying on the British for George Washington, if a "fellow patriot" had gone up to him and said "Nathan. Why are you hanging around with the British? Didn't I see you having beers with George Washington and helping us plan the revolution? Who's side are you on? Come on Nathan tell me? Did you sell us out?"

Seriously, how can you say both interviews are the same? Rand dodge the interview right off the bat, Ron at least answered the question in that interview and the CNN bot wouldn't accept it as an answer about the newsletter.

 

[green73]

Except when he did.

There's no use trying to communicate with you sometimes.

 

[green73]

How can you say that when he has already been on the record being quite forthcoming about it?

Back in 2010?

 

[JohnGalt23g]

Jeebus, give me strength...

So many comments could be made but I have decided I will no longer engage with the willfully ignorant faction trying to divide us and derail our progress.

Don't you know? We haven't made any progress... all we've done is elect neocon traitors like Rand Paul to office. Noecon traitors, who just happen to introduce bills to apply 4th amendment protections to domestic drone use. HOW DARE HE NOT DEMAND THAT NO DRONES EVER BE USED IN AMERICA EVER FOR ANY REASON!!!!!! eVER!11!!1!!1!!!!1ELEVENTY!!!11!!

 

[MJU1983]

Someone who says call my office for an interview? Doing so after that offer is rude, and obnoxious, and juvenile.

LOL

For some reason I don't think you'd say that if it wasn't Rand Paul. Every politician is going to say "call my office" knowing nothing will come of it. Even Bill O'Reilly sends his boy out for these types of "interviews" but try the same tactic on O'Reilly himself...he'll report you to the police.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Back in 2010?

Are you worried that he changed his mind, or what?

 

[LibertyEagle]

LOL

For some reason I don't think you'd say that if it wasn't Rand Paul. Every politician is going to say "call my office" knowing nothing will come of it. Even Bill O'Reilly sends his boy out for these types of "interviews" but try the same tactic on O'Reilly himself...he'll report you to the police.

So, your argument is that because most other politicians do that, Rand will too?

 

[jmdrake]

Seriously, how can you say both interviews are the same? Rand dodge the interview right off the bat, Ron at least answered the question in that interview and the CNN bot wouldn't accept it as an answer about the newsletter.

Ron's never answered the question of who wrote the newsletters. If WAC had simply gone with "Can you tell us why you endorsed Mitt Romney" without going immediately into a conspiracy land Rand might have given them some kind of answer before blowing them off. Tell me this. What do you possibly think might be gained for anybody by Rand talking about the Bilderberg group and this juncture?

 

[LibertyEagle]

Don't you know? We haven't made any progress... all we've done is elect neocon traitors like Rand Paul to office. Noecon traitors, who just happen to introduce bills to apply 4th amendment protections to domestic drone use. HOW DARE HE NOT DEMAND THAT NO DRONES EVER BE USED IN AMERICA EVER FOR ANY REASON!!!!!! eVER!11!!1!!1!!!!1ELEVENTY!!!11!!

Ha ha. Well, I wish he would.

 

[schiffheadbaby]

Don't you know? We haven't made any progress... all we've done is elect neocon traitors like Rand Paul to office. Noecon traitors, who just happen to introduce bills to apply 4th amendment protections to domestic drone use. HOW DARE HE NOT DEMAND THAT NO DRONES EVER BE USED IN AMERICA EVER FOR ANY REASON!!!!!! eVER!11!!1!!1!!!!1ELEVENTY!!!11!!

Wow, so you support the use of Drones in America? Figured that a Rand apologist would be on this side but I'm glad you told us all this.

Wonder if all the other Randy apologists feel the same way

 

[green73]

Are you worried that he changed his mind, or what?

Is he like that on all issues that he's previously addressed?

 

[jmdrake]

There's no use trying to communicate with you sometimes.

Yeah. I should apply for the job of Rand's press secretary. Knowing when not to communicate is sometimes a virtue.

 

[wongster41]

Are you worried that he changed his mind, or what?

He obviously changed his mind about supporting mitt for presidency.

 

[JohnGalt23g]

Ha ha. Well, I wish he would.

I have no problem with drones in general. I can foresee a day when drones are used to do work in rescue situations and disaster situations that is simply too hazardous for humans, and I don't want to preclude their existence. I just want the Fourth Amendment to keep pace with technology the Framers never could have imagined.

 

[green73]

Yeah. I should apply for the job of Rand's press secretary. Knowing when not to communicate is sometimes a virtue.

Well reasoned as always.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Is he like that on all issues that he's previously addressed?

Are you wanting to ask him to reiterate every single thing he has every said?

Fair enough.

Make an appointment.

 

[MJU1983]

So, your argument is that because most other politicians do that, Rand will too?

Why wouldn't he? Do you think he hired morons to run his offices? They aren't going to let him do an interview with Luke or anyone like Luke. Rand is part of the team now, he's not "fringe" anymore. Do you think he will take a picture of himself pulling the lever for Mitt in November?

 

[jmdrake]

Sure. If it was any other pol I'm sure you'd be on the side of the reporter.

It depends on if I'm wanting the reporter to be rude or not. I don't mind that people threw snowballs at Sean Hannity, but that's because I don't like Sean Hannity. That doesn't mean that throwing snowballs at someone you don't personally know isn't rude. I was glad to see the Iraqi reporter throw a shoe at Bush. That doesn't mean shoe throwing isn't rude.