Rand Paul Confronted on Mitt Romney Endorsement by wearechange

say what you want but this is real journalism, you won't see this on fox, cnn, msnbc, abc. It's really painful to watch Rand dodge this interview.

1. Rand had already answered the questions about Bilderberger in a previous interview with Luke.

2. Rand and his aide told Luke that he had just gotten out of a meeting and that she was briefing him before his next thing and asked him to make an appointment.

3. But, noooooooooooooo Luke had to be an asshole and keep on.

Rand didn't dodge shit. Luke is an embarrassment.
 
Rand will likely keep 50%+ of his fathers activist and almost all his voters. He will also likely gain support from many of his ex-supporters with strong stances for freedom on his senate floor. Not to mentionhe has support from many tea party type voters.

While you and I may be upset..make no mistake when the days come for Rand to announce his bid for president..many of us will still be there.

Hopefully Rand will stay true where it matters.

Oh yea like presenting halfass 500 billion dollar budget cuts?

Rand has no charisma or real desire for change. He enjoys his time in DC, and yet everyone supports him because of his name (not a free-market solution)
 
fixed it for you.

My original statement was fine. This ambush type of "reporting" is ridiculous when liberals and conservatives do it. It looks really gawd awful when libertarians try it, fail, and afterwards act like giddy school children.
 
Are you suggesting Bilderberg is not real or not worth talking about?

Have you not seen the other video from Luke where Rand said exactly what he thought the Bilderberg group was?

Yes Ron wanted to influence the party, but he would never endorse a guy who went against everything he stood for.
You are mischaracterizing him.
 
Are you suggesting Bilderberg is not real or not worth talking about? Yes Ron wanted to influence the party, but he would never endorse a guy who went against everything he stood for.

Like when he supported Gingrich for speaker?
 
Have you not seen the other video from Luke where Rand said exactly what he thought the Bilderberg group was?


You are mischaracterizing him.

YOu're trying to talk sense to the people that insist that the Illuminati already have our futures so deeply under control that resistance is futile.
 
1. Rand had already answered the questions about Bilderberger in a previous interview with Luke.

2. Rand and his aide told Luke that he had just gotten out of a meeting and that she was briefing him before his next thing and asked him to make an appointment.

3. But, noooooooooooooo Luke had to be an asshole and keep on.

Rand didn't dodge shit. Luke is an embarrassment.

That interview took place two years ago, he also discredited Mitt around the same time and well, we all know what happened last week. People just have questions right now and it's only fair to ask them.
 
This movement may be the only movement that seeks to hold its own accountable. Granted, it makes our job much more difficult, but is it necessary? (I'll let everyone answer that one themselves)
 
say what you want but this is real journalism, you won't see this on fox, cnn, msnbc, abc. It's really painful to watch Rand dodge this interview.

It's not painful. It's smart. He's trying to broaden support, not harden the hardliners. Of course you can disagree or dislike his strategy but it's clear as day what he's trying to do. I happen to agree with Rand.

Frankly it's not enough to be registered as a member of the GOP. We need to be infiltrate the mainstream. A "R" doesn't make us any less fringe in the eyes of the public. Bridging that gap should be a top goal

He might be trying to broaden his support but at the same time he lost A LOT of support from his core supporters that got him to where he is today, at facevalue, he sold out. If he was to run for president in 2016, where is he going to get the support? The liberty movement?

wongster41 to put it as blunt as possible, yes.

The liberty movement is MUCH more than just Ron Paul supporters and the radical fringe. To become president a candidate MUST appeal to as many people as possible. Rand DID NOT "sell out," he simply understands what it takes to win the game! If you are so stubborn you won't accept this, he's telling you he doesn't need you, because for every one of you he looses he gains several more in exchange. He's holding firm to his liberty convictions, just because you don't agree with his methods doesn't make him wrong. The liberty movement will grow, with or without you and we will support him for a presidential bid...
 
My original statement was fine. This ambush type of "reporting" is ridiculous when liberals and conservatives do it. It looks really gawd awful when libertarians try it, fail, and afterwards act like giddy school children.

^^^THIS!^^^
 
Back
Top