Rand Against the Machine: Chris Hayes reports on Fox News bias and Rand's Patriot Act battle

I like that Ratm banner @1:05 i think we have some friends @ msnbc
I wouldn't go that far! :D MSNBC will be the most vicious critics ever if Rand comes close to winning the nomination. This is just a useful weapon for them to use to bash their competitor for now.
 
That was really good. But, MSNBC will turn against Rand if he gets the nomination in favor of whoever is the Dem. In the meantime, they may get some of their viewers to participate in the Republican primaries, which is good.
 
The machine they refer to would be the rebulican machine....the dems are soft fuzzy bunnies not machines.
 
My response to that comment is to defy them to name another candidate who is right more than once a day :)

It's the most frustrating thing ever to read on DU. There is no week that passes without reading one of those threads on DU where the masses say things like.

I support him in the war but
I support him in criminal justice reform but
I support him on NSA spying but
He is right about blaming the republicans creation of Isis but
Yea, he is right about assets forfeiture laws but

Usually end with "but that is the only thing we agree on" or the classics "he is a broken clock".
 
Rand needs to realize the media is compromised and start hitting them hard, so they can't ignore him. Wake up Neo.
 
It's the most frustrating thing ever to read on DU. There is no week that passes without reading one of those threads on DU where the masses say things like.

I support him in the war but
I support him in criminal justice reform but
I support him on NSA spying but
He is right about blaming the republicans creation of Isis but
Yea, he is right about assets forfeiture laws but

Usually end with "but that is the only thing we agree on" or the classics "he is a broken clock".

Rand is the one who's breaking the clock.. The clock that's at 5 minutes before midnight. Rand is the only one talking about and actually serious about turning back the time on the clock of liberty, freedom and justice for ALL.
 
I thought this Brian guy was a pretty lame interviewee, citing talking points that at times didn't even correspond to the question at hand--a pattern I've begun to see in with Rand as well. The answers are more polished, but if I was actually watching to learn more, it just comes off as incoherent when a question is just blatantly dodged.

Hayes makes objective, thoughtful remarks concerning Rand's chances.
Talking head makes a programmed remark only vaguely intertwined with question.
Rinse, repeat.

Blech.
 
Back
Top