Question For Trump supporters [edit]

The establishment has one goal and that is to hold on to that power to remain, "established".

And they constantly fight amongst themselves for that power. But they will never return it to the people. This whole Trump thing is just an establishment civil war where one faction is fighting a different faction. They're all establishment.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty. - G.W.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scm
And they constantly fight amongst themselves for that power. But they will never return it to the people. This whole Trump thing is just an establishment civil war where one faction is fighting a different faction. They're all establishment.
Those "fights" are probably just distractions.
 
why did "they" let him win?

If by "they" and "them" we mean "globalist hegemons," then I have no idea whether "they" let him win. But I am sure that some of "them" wanted him to win, for reasons Lucille identified in post #27 above. The influence of China and Russia is waxing, and American bellicosity is wearing thin. The "coalition of the willing" ain't so willing anymore, and some of "them" realize this fact. Hillary's hyper-aggressiveness represented a "doubling down" on an investment that is not only returning lower and lower dividends, but which is becoming a serious liability ...
 
Now that he's won.
Do any of you still believe the system is rigged?
If so, why did they let him win?

It IS rigged you dumbass. If you were around as a delegate in 2008 and 2012 you would have seen the bullsh*t they pulled on us. ANY serious reform candidate since Ross Perot, and Ralph Nader, and Ron Paul is met with media collusion and party rule breaking and sabotage.

That on top of Republican candidates in general having to deal with voter fraud such as video of democrats stuffing ballot boxes, voting machine rigging through vote flipping algorithms, voter intimidation, and other behavior.

That Trump won likely means WAY more people voted for him than they could handle. A county for instance of 100,000 can't have 120% voter turn out. So they can only rig it to a certain percentage before being caught with irregularities.
 
Rand would have won the whole thing if the media hadn't focused on Trump. That's the real corruption that's influencing the elections.

Uh, yeah it was confirmed by Wikileaks that the Clinton cartel told the media to focus on Trump and Cruz because he was to extreme to get elected.
 
That on top of Republican candidates in general having to deal with voter fraud such as video of democrats stuffing ballot boxes, voting machine rigging through vote flipping algorithms, voter intimidation, and other behavior.

That Trump won likely means WAY more people voted for him than they could handle. A county for instance of 100,000 can't have 120% voter turn out. So they can only rig it to a certain percentage before being caught with irregularities.

...ugh...turn off the radio, republican cheerleader...
 
  • Like
Reactions: scm
...ugh...turn off the radio, republican cheerleader...

You realize libertarians and ANY other third party need to deal with the same sh*t right? Do you think they are going to say "nah, don't do it to third party candidates"? Stop being naive.
 
Back
Top