Zippyjuan
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 49,008
I could, but I choose to have nicer things in the home I own versus one I would rent out. Most people would likely do the same, if they can afford it.
You have different incentives. As you say, you want to do nicer work in your own home and for a rental you probably want to do it at lowest cost. But lowest cost is not always lowest cost long term- lowest cost may not last as long and have to be redone more often. Either way, renting or buying, you pay the costs. You may end up replacing things like carpets and repainting much more often in a rental (depending on how renters treat it and how often they move). That may end up costing more over time than putting in a nice floor which will last decades. As an owner, you get to decide if you want to keep the upkeep expenses low or spend more. As a renter, you can be pretty sure you will get cheap work done.
I did my own work and replaced flooring in livingroom, dining room and kitchen and also replaced sink and fawcets and countertops and refaced cabinets and spend about $6000 on the entire thing (Pergo flooring and laminate instead of stone counter tops but looks great). I know others who spent $30,000 just on their bathroom.
As a percent of your costs (including the mortgage and property taxes), I find that maintainance costs are actually pretty low unless the property is in poor shape (have a house inspection prior to buying to alert you to possible problems and future expenses- some lenders require it anyways). That should not be a make or break factor. If that is enough to make you say yes or no to "Can I afford it" then you may be cutting it too close financially (you will need to have some flexiblity in case of emergency expenses).
Last edited: