SeanEdwards
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,407
my point is
the problem is : we DON'T have much say today over how we can control our money policy, but once we do, it won't matter if we base it on gold or trust or toilet paper.
when we DO, we can argue what's best later (today people arent even outraged enough to say they want control over their money, so how can you trust they'll be better judge than the Fed Res?)
I hear you and I mostly agree. We don't have much say, but in theory at least, the American people could have rejected all the bullshit and rallied behind Ron Paul, for example. And I really don't think a Ron Paul Presidency would abuse the fed printing presses like the current management does. So I think there is at least the possibility of the people someday imposing sanity on monetary policy.
The problem I see with gold is that we are throwing away the possibility of our political system ever being able to react to and influence economic crises. The very advantage of gold, in that it limits government power, can also be seen as its greatest disadvantage.
Last edited: