Proposed measure would make people take ‘marriage classes’ if they wish to be wed

Suzanimal

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
33,385
Proposed measure would make people take ‘marriage classes’ if they wish to be wed

What could go wrong?:rolleyes:

Attention residents of Colorado, attention residents of Colorado: if you want to recklessly rush into marriage with someone, now’s the time to do it. As KDVR Fox 31 Denver News is reporting, there is currently a push to get an initiative on this coming November’s ballot that would, “require people who want to get married to take pre-wedding marriage classes.”

The Denver Posts reports that the main group behind this is the California-based, Kids Against Divorce (KAD). KAD’s “vision” is to “prevent tomorrow’s victims of divorce by raising awareness on the overall issue including the devastating effects of it, by educating people to be better equipped going into marriage, and by honoring those fully committed to their marriage and therefore providing a stable family foundation for their children.”

How would it work? KDVR writes that “it would require 10 hours of classes if it’s your first marriage. Twenty hours would be required for second marriages and 30 hours for third marriages.” The Denver Post notes that it would be overseen by the Colorado State Board of Marriage and Family Therapist Examiners. After fulfilling the hour requirement, the couple would be issued a “marriage course completion certificate.” They’d also be on the hook to pay for the counseling. Civil unions would not be under the same requirements.

State Senator Pat Steadman (D) doesn’t seem to be a fan of the idea. He told KDVR, “I think it’s putting government in the wrong role, in terms of being involved in people’s personal lives.” Margie Rodgers, who actually did go through premarital counseling through her church, told the Denver Post, “"I don't think it is necessary to mandate in my private life.”

On the other side, KDVR spoke with clinical psychologist Dr. Sheryl Ziegler, who thinks the proposal wouldn’t hurt. Dr. Ziegler told the station, “If anything negative were to come out of it, it might be that the couple realizes that they have a lot of incompatibilities, and that they have choices to make, now before they get married, in terms of either fixing those things or coming to the realization that they’re not compatible.” Sharon Tekolian, of KAD, thinks the education counseling provides will make a positive impact.

Kids Against Divorce, the California-based group behind the initiative.

KAD will have to gather 86,000 signatures by August for it to make the ballot. That might be too much of an uphill battle for a group that doesn’t even have 500 likes on Facebook. Neither the Denver Post nor KDVR mentioned why Kids Against Divorce has chosen Colorado as the first state they’ll try to enact this measure.

More info: The Denver Post, KDVR
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/oddnews...lasses’-if-they-wish-to-be-wed-223404593.html
 
On the other side, KDVR spoke with clinical psychologist Dr. Sheryl Ziegler, who thinks the proposal wouldn’t hurt.

Of course it wouldn't. :rolleyes:

They’d also be on the hook to pay for the counseling.

Perhaps this is just the legislation needed to convince Christians to focus on getting government out of marriage as opposed to keeping gays out of marriage.

Margie Rodgers, who actually did go through premarital counseling through her church, told the Denver Post, “"I don't think it is necessary to mandate in my private life.”
 
Next.... If you want to have kids you need a license and be approved by the government....
 
I found this part interesting:

This bill was sponsored by Kids Against Divorce. It's pretty obvious that a same sex couple is not going to be able to procreate. They may adopt, but I would imagine the adoption process would require counseling.
 
This bill was sponsored by Kids Against Divorce. It's pretty obvious that a same sex couple is not going to be able to procreate. They may adopt, but I would imagine the adoption process would require counseling.

would you like me to find you some news articles disputing that? Ever heard of a sperm donor or egg donor?
 
would you like me to find you some news articles disputing that? Ever heard of a sperm donor or egg donor?

Sure, but there is a little more involved with artificial insemination. I wouldn't imagine it is like walking into a 7-11 and getting a Slurpee. Though, admittedly I do not know. However, getting married was kinda like walking into 7-11 here in N.C. If we had chosen to we could have conceived in that first month.
Don't get me wrong. It's a bullshit bill. It is foisted by the counselling industry and KAD.
 
Of course it wouldn't. :rolleyes:



Perhaps this is just the legislation needed to convince Christians to focus on getting government out of marriage as opposed to keeping gays out of marriage.

I've been convinced awhile ago, but my original response to this thread was just going to be "N.A.P."
 
So, everyone who gets married is popping out kids?

Nanny, nanny, help me...
 
Civil unions would not be under the same requirements.

Marriage equality, you know!

A marriage license is a state license, why not require testing? They do it for everything else.
 
I got married outside the U.S. We had to sit through this idiotic government counseling that lasted 6-7 hours. I don't speak the language, so didn't understand a word they were saying. That might sound good at first glance, but it was sleep deprivation torture.
 
Back
Top