- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,473
Brian, I love you... but this tax cut is a positive no matter what.
Regardless is the imperfections, giving less money to the crooks in D.C. is a good thing.
Please correct me if I am wrong here.
Carried interest "loophole" = Tax deduction
Deductions that reduce tax liabilities means less money for politicians to spend. Less money in politicians hands = more money in private hands.
More deductions > less deductions
Private hands > government hands
Free markets > government contracts
Some win > no win
My goal is Ron Paul's goal. Reduce the income tax to 0%.
Of course. No personal income tax at all is the goal.
My understanding is that the carried interest loophole allows money managers to categorize their adviser/management income as long term capital gains, which is taxed at a much lower rate. So it's not a deduction. It's a special categorization.
I like lower taxes more than most people, but if they insert a section into the code stating that actor's wages based on box office take shall be taxed at a lower rate (because everyone loves actors and they deserve a tax break), I won't be celebrating.
Either way, my preference is for lower rates for all. Deductions, write-offs and complexities enable cronyism and social and economic "engineering".