President Trump fires FBI Director James Comey

[Created4]

 

[CPUd]

 

[Pericles]

I approve of this message

 

[Dr.No.]

And meanwhile, the left is losing its $#@! while forgetting that Bill Clinton did the same thing to Reagan appointed FBI director William Sessions in July of 1993.

Was Sessions in the middle of investigating Clinton?

 

[shakey1]

Me thinks the game has just begun.

 

[devil21]

Did Trump find out about Comey's Howdy Doody fetish?

 

[Valli6]

Rand on CNN: Dems acting "holier-than-thou"

Rand: "Dems acting "holier-than-thou"
(7:33) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQGmyEhKOes


(Daily Caller - 5/10/17 - by Amber Athey)

Sen. Rand Paul is sick of Democrats acting “holier than thou” over the firing of former FBI Director James Comey, and he argued on CNN Wednesday that many of them wanted the law enforcement official ousted much sooner.

Host Wolf Blitzer first asked the Kentucky Republican why Trump didn’t fire Comey sooner into his presidency.

“I think the same people who criticize him now would have also said, ‘well, he didn’t go through any deliberative process,'” Paul said. “I think it took a long time mainly because Democrats opposed approving [the attorney general and deputy attorney general.”

Paul then slammed Democrats for their “crocodile tears” over the firing.

“I think it’s kind of crocodile tears now for the Democrats…they’ve been haranguing and saying [Comey] cost them the election — they’ve been calling for his head for months.”

“When it finally happens they’re all holier than thou and this is Watergate? That’s ridiculous,” Paul asserted.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/10/paul-dems-acting-holier-than-thou-over-comey-firing-video/

 

[CPUd]

https://twitter.com/PostGraphics/status/862395759236448261

 

[H. E. Panqui]

:o

...ugh...the republican-radio airwaves are all a-twitter with goddamned fools who spend their lives flailing at the leaves of the tree of evil...NEVER $triking the root$...

...constant circuses and chemical bread...[hint for republicrat-radio peckerheads: ...'the comey issue' is yet another circu$ distraction...merely another leaf on the tree of evil...

...republicrats have some awful, sick, twisted priorities....ugh...

 

[phill4paul]

Rand: "Dems acting "holier-than-thou"
(7:33) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQGmyEhKOes


(Daily Caller - 5/10/17 - by Amber Athey)

This is pretty much how I see it. They WANTED him ousted. Now that he is they pitch a bitch.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

:o

...ugh...the republican-radio airwaves are all a-twitter

Is it safe to say that, despite railing against RPF posters, any and all, for being allegedly mind-controlled by right-wing talk radio in approx. 2/3 of your posts, you yourself are the one consuming said radio shows in vast and prodigious quantities, likely on a daily or semi-daily basis?

I am shocked. Shocked.

 

[dannno]

Did Trump find out about Comey's Howdy Doody fetish?

I thought that was McAfee..

 

[phill4paul]

Lol. This broad....

Maxine Waters: I Don't Support Trump Firing Comey, I Would Support Hillary Clinton Firing Comey

PETER ALEXANDER, NBC NEWS: You obviously have been very critical of James Comey in the past. You said that he had no credibility. I assume you support the president's decision then to fire his FBI director.

REP. MAXINE WATERS (D-CA): No, I do not necessarily support the president's decision.

If the president had not gone all over the country praising him about the way he handled Hillary and the e-mails, if the president had not said he had confidence in him, if the president had not said he was a part of his team --

ALEXANDER: But Congresswoman, I understand in the past he was praising him. But if you said that FBI Director James Comey had no credibility, wouldn't you support the fact that the president, then-candidate Trump, now president Trump, made the decision to get rid of him?

WATERS: No, not necessarily.

ALEXANDER: Why not?

WATERS: You have an investigation going on where the president is implicated. And this is a serious investigation. I've been trying on get people to focus this connection with the Kremlin and with Putin. I have a resolution that I introduced in February. I think there's enough there that we know about the Kremlin and about Putin to be concerned about whether or not there was collusion. I believe there was --

ALEXANDER: So to be clear --

WATERS: And that I believe they should have to connect the dots and get the facts because I think it will lead to the impeachment of this president.

ALEXANDER: So, Congresswoman, respecting that be to be clear, you believe it would have been better to keep in place an FBI Director who you said had no credibility to oversee this investigation than to find someone who you think would be a better choice.

WATERS: No. But I believe the president thought that. Don't forget. You're talking about what some Democrats said, what I said, but don't forget. He was the president. The president supported him. He had confidence in him. It was within his power.

ALEXANDER: But you said he had no credibility so it would make sense that he get rid of him.

WATERS: No, no, no. Under investigation. This president basically has interfered with an investigation where he may be implicated. That's outrageous. And that's why we're having so much of a conversation about it today. Everybody is talking about it because this is highly unusual.

ALEXANDER: The bottom line is you think an FBI director without credibility would have been best served in this position to try to pursue this investigation.

WATERS: I think that if the president would have fired him when he first came in, he would not have to be in a position now where he is trying to make up a story about why. It does not meet the smell test.


Waters said she would support Clinton if she fired Comey:

ALEXANDER: Understood. So if Hillary Clinton had won the White House, would you have recommended that she fire FBI Director James Comey?

WATERS: Well, let me tell you something. If she had won the White House, I believe that given what he did to her, and what he tried to do, she should have fired him. Yes.

ALEXANDER: So she should have fired him but had he shouldn't fire him. This is why I'm confused.

WATERS: No, you're not confused. If the president is implicated in an investigation --

ALEXANDER: I am confused.

WATERS: -- the president of the United States who has a history of firing people who get close to, you know, him and his allies like Flynn, and like Miss Yates, he will fire them if he believes somehow they're getting too close to him in these investigations. I believe that the president of the United States should not have done this in the middle of an investigation. That's it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...uld_support_hillary_clinton_firing_comey.html

 

[AuH20]

I just have to sit back with a wide grin on my face..........

 

[TheCount]

I just have to sit back with a wide grin on my face..........

Cernovich via Infowars via some guy. Sweet.

Also, I presume that Cernovich has changed his mind on immunity since this video:

 

[dannno]

Cernovich via Infowars via some guy. Sweet.

7 Stories Mike Cernovich Had Before the Mainstream Media

https://medium.com/@Cernovich/7-sto...-how-can-they-call-him-fake-news-aaf1c1e20f0b

Also, I presume that Cernovich has changed his mind on immunity since this video:

Wow, great job, someone got him on a technicality and you copy pasted it.. but in the end, Cernovich is still right and you are still wrong.

In that video he claimed that Flynn asked for immunity because he thought they might frame him, because he is an enemy of the deep state, not because he was scared he did anything wrong.

Currently, he is saying that Susan Rice is asking for immunity because she is scared because she did something wrong.

In the first scenario, he is referring to someone who is an enemy of the state.

In the second scenario, he is referring to someone who was being protected by the state.

These are two vastly different scenarios.

 

[phill4paul]

 

[jonhowe]

Someone who I like is visiting CRAZYTOWN.

It's not crazy anymore. The claims are unfounded, but they are widespread. Do the investigation. Get it cleared up, either way. It wont go away without a major study.

 

[CPUd]

https://twitter.com/RonWyden/status/862425117397319681

 

[AuH20]

This entire Russian angle was cooked up by Robbie Mook and Podesta, when they realized Hillary was going to be persona non grata. This was their way of projecting responsibility for the disaster outside the Democratic Party.