PPP Tweets about e-mail received from Ron Paul supporter

Every election ever has had some degree of voting fraud. MIght voting fraud hurt RP more than other candidates? yes, to the point where he could lose a state because of it? not so far, do we gain anything by complaining about this? Absolutely not!!
 
Exactly.

Sadly, people do not know the difference between voting irregularities and voter fraud. Regarding the SC dead people one source wrote, "No fraudulent votes were ever cast. The Republican election official who first released the story said the problem could also be from voters casting absentee ballots before their deaths or by data errors."


And, for what it's worth, there isn't a concerting effort among those in the media to marginalize and demonize Ron Paul supporters. The nutjob quotient among us do a good enough job themselves.
 
It tells me PPP has an agenda to be retweeting such frivolity.

Come on, no they don't. They've made lots of pro-Paul tweets in their history, talking about how Paul might be the strongest candidate against Obama despite not doing as well as Romney in their polls. Some of Paul's highest numbers and biggest leads have come in their polls, PPP is far better to Paul than practically anyone outside his supporters. It just tells you that Paul has some fanatical supporters, which everyone already knew.
 
And, for what it's worth, there isn't a concerting effort among those in the media to marginalize and demonize Ron Paul supporters. The nutjob quotient among us do a good enough job themselves.

Come on. How often have you heard members of the MSM label Ron Paul supporters as a bunch of druggies just wanting to legalize drugs.
 
And, for what it's worth, there isn't a concerting effort among those in the media to marginalize and demonize Ron Paul supporters.

Yea, well maybe not us so much, but definitely for Ron. You can't blame people for being upset about it and speaking out and wanting to defend him.
 
Last edited:
Yea, well maybe not us so much, but definitely for Ron. You can't blame people for being upset about and speaking out and wanting to defend him.

I do understand people's desire to defend him. The problem is that anytime an article is published or a TV piece is done that shows just the slightest hint of bias against Paul, you have 100's if not 1000's of people firing off nasty emails to the media. It obviously hasn't changed the slant. I am not saying that we shouldn't defend our guy, it's the means is which some do so that is working against us.

You see the language that many on here use when referring to the media, other candidates and even the voters in a particular state. You can only imagine the type of emails that wind up in the inbox of Fox News. So not only are these people biased against Paul, they see a sizable percentage of his supporters as nutjobs. You and I both know that the ones firing off the most emails are likely not the ones that can eloquently address an issue, but are probably the ones addressing the email as "Dear Neo-con Scumbags"
 
Instead of emails complaining about it lets send slightly similar and say were a Newt or Romney or Santorum supporter and see if they tweet it
 
Or he could be right

Edit:
Iowa non-binding straw poll - 8 precincts missing; results can never be certified
NH - I see dead people (on voter rolls/ballots)
South Carolina - I see dead people (casting votes)

time to twitter war with ppp it seems, get some articles together and tweet back;)
 
It tells me PPP has an agenda to be retweeting such frivolity.

Yes, that we leave them the hell alone and stop sullying Ron Paul's name.

time to twitter war with ppp it seems, get some articles together and tweet back;)

Oh yeah, man. That'll show them. Then they're definitely change their mind and gonna be a lot nicer to us and Paul. Genius.
 
time to twitter war with ppp it seems, get some articles together and tweet back;)

We have just a couple weeks before the four caucuses. How will getting into a twitter war with PPP get us new voters inn the caucus states?

If Paul doesn't win a contest very soon, this thing will be over then you will all have plenty of time for Twitter wars. The lack of focus on the urgency of the situation astounds me and others on here.
 
True, but we seemed to have cornered the market on overly zealous supporters that don't think before they speak (or type for that matter)


But the rest have the market cornered on disinterested supporters that don't think before they vote.

HTH
Rev9
 
We love PPP when their polls go our way, when the polls don't go our way, we find reasons to not like them. At least they must get some l-o-l's in their office from it all.
 
I hope that was a troll pretending to be us because sending that kind of email is never going to make us look good and serves zero purpose.
 
We love PPP when their polls go our way, when the polls don't go our way, we find reasons to not like them. At least they must get some l-o-l's in their office from it all.

I think they are as accurate as they are capable of being in the two week target before an election when they are rated. Before then, I think they, like other pollsters, absolutely play games with demographics etc. Sometimes just out of boredom.
 
Well, I disagree with you on this point, but will leave at that.

You can disagree with him, but the votes missing in Iowa were far, far less than those needed for RP to win or take second (they accounted for a grand total of 298 votes in 2008) and the number of dead voters was ~0.016% of the votes in SC. To call this voter fraud is ridiculous.
 
Back
Top