PPP Tweet: ARG poll "seems impossible"
- Thread starter pauliticalfan
- Start date
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
they aren't, but they defend their contemporaneous poll and demonstrate their own greater expertise.
First off, it's an unbiased. Second, you can't have an unbiased poll if it's conducted by supporters of a candidate, even if you agree with him.
Johnnybags
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,126
Obvious the brass were in such a rush to get a Paul falling story out they could not even proofread their own bullshit poll so had to keep the story line intact and fudge the numbers.
joshnorris14
Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Messages
- 617
A poll is unbiased as long as the sample is random.
tremendoustie
Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,809
That kind of differential is impossible. Couples most often vote together, etc. -- you will never see 24% support from one gender and 7% from another in a real political poll.
Ranger29860
Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 1,882
That's still not totally true. Polls can be easily influenced simply by your choice of words, and I have no doubt many of these big polling companies use that to their own advantage. It would be interesting to see the exact question most of these people are asked.
Example:
Who do you want to win ---?
Who do you think will win---?
Who is doing the best in ---?
Last edited:
Bingo.
Only some power hungry egotistical government bureaucrat could f*ck this up, this bad.
I'll bet there's hordes of little "yes" men, with their noses in his ass trying to knock him off the ladder saying "oh noes, the boss won't listen, Ron Paul really is winning, we can't control this anymore...if he would just do this, or that differently"
This reeks of someone controlling the outcome via repeated narratives, and failing - big time.
I have a feeling the rEVOLution wave is about to reveal it's tsunaminess as it closes in on the shallow, dangerous reefs of politics as usual in America.
specsaregood
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 39,143
It's not that they're Paul supporters, but they are competing with other pollsters. When you can point out that your competitors are delivering a faulty product, that gives you a leg up. Free Market yo!
WTH?
You don't know what you are talking about. Candidates do internal polls all the time using their own people! They aren't going to rely on the polling companies or wait for them, they need the data when they need it. And yes they can be unbiased even though they support Ron Paul. Do you think the "professional polls" done elsewhere don't have people doing them that have a preference for a certain candidate they are polling on? Dream on.
Another thing. A poll with numbers like this is not only NOT unbiased, it is total BS! You need to think before you post man!
There were no typos in the results. They don't spend so much on doing these polls only to release them with typos when they are going to be picked up and used by TV shows right away. That is not going to happen. The poll was released this way on purpose. They just don't care if people even know they are releasing BS, as long as it shows what their bosses want it to show. It is blatant, in your face fraud, just asking everybody, what the heck are you going to do about it when we steal the election Paul fans?
woah where was this poll before
Similar threads
