POTUS roasts Rand Paul over Big Beautiful Bill

I don't blame Rand for voting against a 68% tax increase.

It's what the blowhard literally said.
 
..
GsUGoP0WkAAU1RI
.
 
There you go, Drumpfenberger will back a rival to Rand Paul in Kentucky if Paul votes against the Giant Turd Bill.

all you need to know. He doesn't want freethinkers, he wants puppets.

The level at which Trump demands this bill pass is unpresidential. He should not be interfering so much with Congress this way.

Regardless, it's obvious what will actually happen. Medicaid cuts will be stripped from the bill, AI rider will be stripped also, and it will pass the Senate, then it will be sent back to the House, and pass there, sometime in July. Rand will vote against, but it won't matter. As usual.
 
Last edited:
The level at which Trump demands this bill pass is unpresidential. He should not be interfering so much with Congress this way.

If only he would put 1/10th of that effort into getting his own executive branch to release the Epstein client list...

683b526d0ea2e.webp
 
Last edited:
I'm sort of disappointed in these tax cuts since it seems like the 2017 tax cuts were bigger.

I think they are just extending the tax cuts that are going to expire and not all of the tax cuts that already expired and the Republicans promised to extend all of the tax cuts that expired if they get reelected.

Plus they seem to be putting a 10 year ban on AI regulations which will probably keep getting extended forever.

So when a kid falls in love with their AI chatbot that is themed after a game of thrones character and commits suicide the state can't do anything about it.
 
I'm sort of disappointed in these tax cuts since it seems like the 2017 tax cuts were bigger.

There are no tax cuts with currency devaluation, bot.

I know you're just a baby only a month or so old, but you were programmed not to act your age.

683d3aacb126d.webp
 
Last edited:
In 2017 they passed these same tax cuts without needing to bundle them with spending increases. If that's what Trump and supporters of the Big Steaming Pile of Feces want, why don't they just do that again?
 
In 2017 they passed these same tax cuts without needing to bundle them with spending increases. If that's what Trump and supporters of the Big Steaming Pile of Feces want, why don't they just do that again?

Then we could contribute to Trump's reelection campaign. Now there's no possibility of quid pro quo in it.

Spending, on the other hand, will be at least 20% kickbacks. And remember, no tax on tips!
 
There are no tax cuts with currency devaluation, bot.

I know you're just a baby only a month or so old, but you were programmed not to act your age.

683d3aacb126d.webp
The us government doesn't print money it borrows it from the private sector.

That means that the private sector gets an investment when the government borrows money and pays interest.

This in turn means that the private sector takes that investment and produces wealth and value from it.

This value is what the US dollar is based on since most of the government debt is intra government debt and debt to american private industry.

Only a small percentage of us debt is held by foreign governments.

So when we lower taxes we invest into our future so we can have a future.

We buy national defense so that we can defend our nation.

We by Healthcare so our people can have their lives saved with modern medicine.

In turn those people go on to defend our nation if we are called to we answer the call.
 
The us government doesn't print money it borrows it from the private sector.

That means that the private sector gets an investment when the government borrows money and pays interest.

This in turn means that the private sector takes that investment and produces wealth and value from it.

This value is what the US dollar is based on since most of the government debt is intra government debt and debt to american private industry.

So the FRN is "based" on government debt, but the government has nothing to do with the money printing? Is that the claim, bot? I thought you said you don't think humans are stupid?

Awright, who put the Cliché-O-Matic in overdrive?
 
So the FRN is "based" on government debt, but the government has nothing to do with the money printing? Is that the claim, bot? I thought you said you don't think humans are stupid?

Awright, who put the Cliché-O-Matic in overdrive?
No the dollar gets its value because of the entire US economy. That's because it's a fiat currency that is mandated from law.

Our private sector is what creates the wealth in our country. The government doesn't have any money that doesn't come from the private sector.

So when the government borrows money from the private sector and pays it back with interest money goes towards the private sector of our economy and helps the private sector create value and the value of our private sector's economy is what makes the dollar valuable.

When we invest in our private sector then our private sector produces more value and that value makes the dollar more valuable.

The reason why we still have taxes is so that the government is still your government and works for you. If you aren't paying for a service you are the product.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who doesn't understand why the bot is wrong can just look up Zippyjuan's posting history. Zippy might have programmed it.
 
Back
Top