Postcards from the Clown Show

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1444044431674548224
ENA51Yg.png


6JGS5Lk.jpg
 
Last edited:
You just can't satisfy these clowns.

A Sonic employee politely asks for this man's[1] pronouns.

Then the asshole gets pissed off when the Sonic guy doesn't just guess them.

(And of course, if he guesses "wrong" ...)

This is just an excuse for petty control freaks to bully and badger other people.

They're not offended when you use the "wrong" pronouns. They get off on it.

Tweets hidden to save space:


[1] Yeah, that's right. I referred to this bozo as a "man". Come at me.
 
Last edited:
Let me guess: All you read was the headline?
I wondered where your royal lineage originated. And here you make an appropriate appearance. "The Count of Clown World..." It does have a nice ring to it.
 
Last edited:
Let me guess: All you read was the headline?

I read the entire article, as well as Deggans' even longer one at npr.org.

Deggans has his panties in twist because he thinks Chapelle is "using white privilege" the wrong way.
 
Last edited:
Deggans has his panties in twist because he thinks Chapelle is "using white privilege" the wrong way.

He thinks that Chappelle is "using white privilege" as a defense for why he can make fun of white people in a way that he doesn't think that black people should be made fun of.

In other words, he's calling Chappelle out on race-base hypocrisy.


I despise the way that the article is written, it's in essentially written in some weird alternate SJW-ish dialect that I find nearly impossible to read/understand, but I agree with the point that I think he's making.
 
Last edited:
He thinks that Chappelle is "using white privilege" as a defense for why he can make fun of white people in a way that he doesn't think that black people should be made fun of.

In other words, he's calling Chappelle out on race-base hypocrisy.


I despise the way that the article is written, it's in essentially written in some weird alternate SJW-ish dialect that I find nearly impossible to read/understand, but I agree with the point that I think he's making.

Wasn't hard for me to understand.

But lines like that assume that the struggle over oppression is a zero-sum game — that because some gay people have access to white privilege in America, all their concerns about stereotyping and marginalization are hollow and subordinate to what Black people face.

It ignores the fact that there are plenty of nonwhite gay people who face oppression for both their sexual orientation and their race. And, of course, opposing these public statements of homophobia isn't just about making gay people feel better; it's about keeping the anger and prejudice behind those words from becoming widely acceptable or turning into action.

Based in self absorbed twaddle about "oppression".

Having a politically correct comic poke fun at you is not "oppression". And yes, that's all Chapelle is. How far would an Andrew Dice Clay, a Sam Kinison or even a Don Rickles get today, as white men cracking the same jokes?

No homosexual or colored person is oppressed in 2021 Amerika.

They are in places like Trashcanistan and China, where they throw in concentration camps or off high buildings.

That idiotic assumption "oh, we're so oppressed, oh how we struggle", that alone is worthy comedic satire and ridicule.
 
That idiotic assumption "oh, we're so oppressed, oh how we struggle", that alone is worthy comedic satire and ridicule.

Puts me in mind of this:


These people are actually using the thing on the right to sell the thing on the left.

It is funny. It's fucking hilarious. And the most laughable thing is, it's working. The more we laugh at it, the more determined they are to make it happen.

But we're trapped. The only thing we can do is double down ourselves. Laugh HARDER!

He who laughs last laughs best--because he won. Let the meme war continue!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top