- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,932
Except I wouldn't call it a children's game, although childhood is usually when people start playing it. It's not childishly insipid like Candy Land or The Game of Life. There's real strategy to it.
I suspect such niceties would be lost on Turner.
She only seems to be interested in pretending that a dice-based game in which the win condition is contrived to be "one person controlling everything" somehow "demonstrates" something about "free market capitalism". (In that respect, she probably thought calling it a "children's" game supports her ridiculous "point" - assuming she even thought about it at all.)
Do you remember Anti-Monopoly? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Monopoly
Never heard of it. Interesting!
To be honest, though, I'm not quite sure what to make of it, LOL:
Players take the role of federal case workers bringing indictments against each monopolised business in an attempt to return the state of the board to a free market system.
I appreciate the apparently pro-free-market sentiment, but I can't say I care much for promoting the notion that monopolies just sort of happen and it's up to government to ride in and save the market from itself - especially given the instrumental role governments so often play in enabling and protecting monopolies and cartels in the first place.
But at least it gives me an excellent excuse to promote something from the currently ongoing Mises University 2023:
Competition and Monopoly | Peter G. Klein
Government attempts to limit “monopoly power” cannot improve well-being.
Download lecture slides at: https://mises.org/MU23_PPT_15
Recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 25 July 2023.
https://odysee.com/@mises:1/competition-and-monopoly-peter-g.-3:1