Lord Xar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 7,803
What many of you and what Ron Paul is not getting is that the phrasing, in this instance, requires a certain participation from the recipient.
If Frank asks questions that are worded in such a way, then Ron Paul needs to not do what he has been doing.... notably, keep quieting and letting everyone walk all over him. He also need, ron paul, to REPHRASE the question before he answers..... HE NEEDS TO REPHRASE THE DEBATE/QUESTION SO THAT the audience can then refilter the intent.
If Ron Paul doesn't do this, yeah - it will be LAME and the same ol' same ol' -- BUT if he does, he scores a home-run.
We just need a new improved Ron Paul to show up at the debates. Is that gonna happen?
If Frank asks questions that are worded in such a way, then Ron Paul needs to not do what he has been doing.... notably, keep quieting and letting everyone walk all over him. He also need, ron paul, to REPHRASE the question before he answers..... HE NEEDS TO REPHRASE THE DEBATE/QUESTION SO THAT the audience can then refilter the intent.
If Ron Paul doesn't do this, yeah - it will be LAME and the same ol' same ol' -- BUT if he does, he scores a home-run.
We just need a new improved Ron Paul to show up at the debates. Is that gonna happen?