Poll: Majority of Americans support conquest, mass bombings

The Jewish people owned the land in Israel originally and then were driven out by the Romans around 70AD. They now have the land back that they owned originally, before they were driven out of their own land.

So do you support resetting ALL territories on EARTH back to the boundaries and owners they had in 70AD?

Please tell me you're at least consistent.
 
Last edited:
^^^^That is pretty much what I was trying to say, maybe not so eloquently. We have no idea what land was gained or lost by warring tribes of Native Americans before the Europeans showed up. However, Israel IS currently occupying lands which were not given to them by the UN declaration. And you are correct about "might makes right." the Israelis are occupying lands claimed from the "8 day war, of which they were not the aggressor. Nevertheless, this is a conflict that should be settled by the parties involved, not some outsiders who have their own agenda.

The same UN declaration that made Israel a state also made Palestine a state.
 
If I invade your house, and proclaim it as my own, then kill you am I defending my property?
 
Obviously you haven't read much US history. Maybe you oaught to read about the trail of tears. Maybe you oaught to research that the indians involved actually tried to be American citizens and took their claims the the supreme court and won. But the peoples man Jackson ignored the supreme court and sent the federal army to march them a thousand miles to what was considered useless land. Our occupation of the indians terratory was every last bit as ugly as the Israeli occupation.

I’m quite aware of that indefensible behavior on the part of the US almost 200 years ago, but the population density of Native Americans in the US then was far less than that of the Palestinians in Palestine in 1947; and the N.A. population has been around 2 million for over 100 years. The population of Palestinians is 9 million plus, and historic Palestine is around the size of New Hampshire, 100 times smaller than the US mainland.
 
Last edited:
Let's see here, according to wikipedia(I know, I know), 61 whole Israelis have been killed by rocket/mortar attacks(combined) since 2001. How many Palestinians have been killed in that time by Israel using (US supplied) bullets/bombs/mortars and missiles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel


Your neighbor fires at you with suped-up bottle rockets that RARELY land anywhere but in open fields and olive groves, you respond with a billion dollars worth of tanks, missiles and smart bombs. Seems fair to me. :rolleyes:
 
I’m quite aware of that indefensible behavior on the part of the US almost 200 years ago, but the population density of Native Americans in the US then was far less than that of the Palestinians in Palestine in 1947; and the N.A. population has been around 2 million for over 100 years. The population of Palestinians is 9 million plus, and historic Palestine is around the size of New Hampshire, 100 times smaller than the US mainland.
What the H*ll does population density have to do with it? There is probably 7 million in Hongkong in 380 square miles, so does that make it ok for them to take over Palestine?
 
If I invade your house, and proclaim it as my own, then kill you am I defending my property?

Yes, according to the Zio-NAZIs a big fucking kill the children and rape the women yes. But you have to remember that according to these evil Luciferian fuck tards history begins when and where they say so. And I love it how these Euro-Mites and their army of brain dead parrots cry antisemitism at the first criticism of their beloved murderers despite ignoring the fact that Palestinians are also Semitic people which is quite different from being a Khazarian AshkeNAZI.
 
What the H*ll does population density have to do with it? There is probably 7 million in Hongkong in 380 square miles, so does that make it ok for them to take over Palestine?

Are the inhabitants of Hong Kong refugees of historic Palestine?
 
Back
Top