Poll: Judge Roy Moore leads competitors in runoff

[euphemia]

Trump and Moore may have set the blueprint for defeating establishment mega money and smear campaign strategies that many are going to be forced to follow if they want any chance at winning in 2018. Use of Twitter and alternative media sources allowing for manuveurability around the media blockade is required.

When people complain to me about Trump's use of Twitter, I ask, "Isn't it refreshing to get unfiltered, unspun Presidential words?" Trump is not the first president who was hated by the media. He won't be the last. It's nice to get the straight story, even if I don't like the way he expresses things.

 

[AuH20]

America was greater than present, even when slavery was in effect. I hate progs with a passion and can't wait to see them go down in flames after this Moore election. Maybe they'll self-immolate.

http://www.newsweek.com/roy-moore-last-time-america-great-during-slavery-741845

I bet Ron Paul privately thinks the same, especially when he views the world through the prism of negative rights.

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/Eugene_Scott/status/938453850557698049/photo/1

 

[fedupinmo]

And what if he did it 40 years ago in Alabama?
Also, is the black man a strict constitutionalist with 40 years of experience upholding the real law in the face of "bipartisanship" and NWO mission creep?

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Also, is the black man a strict constitutionalist with 40 years of experience upholding the real law in the face of "bipartisanship" and NWO mission creep?

A strict constructionist wouldn't claim that Muslims shouldn't be allowed to sit in Congress; apparently Moore's copy of the Constitution doesn't contain the no-religious-test clause.

 

[specsaregood]

The meltdown is gonna be great when Moore wins.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

It would make him controllable by TPTB. As long as he tows the Party line, he would go to the front of the list. And the voters could not care less.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

A strict constructionist wouldn't claim that Muslims shouldn't be allowed to sit in Congress; apparently Moore's copy of the Constitution doesn't contain the no-religious-test clause.

Don't construe any commentary on this leftist hysteria and political games as enthusiastic support for Moore.

 

[William Tell]

[h=1]Roy Moore accuser alters story on yearbook signing, to hold press conference[/h]
Beverly Young Nelson, the former Gadsden waitress who presented her high school yearbook she said was signed by Roy Moore, altered the story she originally told regarding the yearbook signature.


In an interview Friday with ABC's Good Morning America, Nelson said she made some notes in the yearbook below where Moore signed it. Underneath Moore's alleged signature is a date and location that Nelson said Moore signed the yearbook - "12-22-77" and on the next line "Olde Hickory House," the restaurant where Nelson worked and she said Moore was a frequent customer.


At her original press conference making the allegations on Nov. 13, Nelson said that Moore signed the yearbook and made no references to any notes she added later.

hxxp://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/roy_moore_accuser_alters_story.html#incart_river_home

[h=2]Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.[/h] And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription.

Beverly Young Nelson, one of the women accusing GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual misconduct, tells @GMA it “sickens” her to think what might happen if Moore is elected. https://t.co/wuEGWr0kng pic.twitter.com/lcp5OY4x3A
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) December 8, 2017


​

“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News tells us, “But the message was all Roy Moore.”


“Beverly he signed your yearbook,”ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.


“He did sign it,” she replies.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ell-roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-yearbook/

 

[William Tell]

http://thegoldwater.com/news/11904-Son-of-Roy-Moore-s-Accuser-says-She-s-a-Filthy-Liar

And now his step mom is changing her story.

 

[phill4paul]

hxxp://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/roy_moore_accuser_alters_story.html#incart_river_home

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ell-roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-yearbook/

I knew when Allred refused to release it for independent review it was only a matter of time.

 

[sparebulb]

Nelson and Allred should be criminally charged with mayhem.

 

[phill4paul]

Don't construe any commentary on this leftist hysteria and political games as enthusiastic support for Moore.

Indeed. I personally don't much care for him, but Rand spoke with him and it seems he is willing to work with Rand on some issues. I've just enjoyed watching the political efforts of the left implode and the fact that two of their own senators got caught up in it.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Indeed. I personally don't much care for him, but Rand spoke with him and it seems he is willing to work with Rand on some issues. I've just enjoyed watching the political efforts of the left implode and the fact that two of their own senators got caught up in it.

That.

If he and Rand see eye to eye on many issues, than I have no problem with him.

In case anybody has not noticed already, the Bolsheviks have declared open, violent warfare on us and the people who represent us.

We need every ally we can get.

 

[William Tell]

[h=1]Nolte — Flashback: WaPo Document Expert Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook ‘Consistent with One Writer’[/h]
[h=2]Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”[/h] The context of when Bump published this piece is important. If you recall, the Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time that outside fact-checking of the Post‘s reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured a false narrative.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...ged-roy-moore-yearbook-consistent-one-writer/

 

[Zippyjuan]

hxxp://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/roy_moore_accuser_alters_story.html#incart_river_home

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ell-roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-yearbook/

So he still signed it but she added:

D.A. 12-22-77 Olde Hickory House."

http://www.oann.com/judge-roy-moore-accuser-admits-to-forging-part-of-yearbook-note/

Does not disprove any allegations. Why did a 30 year old man sign her yearbook?

 

[phill4paul]

So he signed it and she added:

She lied about the signature. Two other waitresses there also exposed her lies. She's a lieing liar. And she STILL won't release the book for independent review.

 

[Swordsmyth]

So he still signed it but she added:

http://www.oann.com/judge-roy-moore-accuser-admits-to-forging-part-of-yearbook-note/

It looks like she wrote all of it:

Nolte — Flashback: WaPo Document Expert Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook ‘Consistent with One Writer’

Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”

The context of when Bump published this piece is important. If you recall, the Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time that outside fact-checking of the Post‘s reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured a false narrative.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journal...nt-one-writer/

 

[EBounding]

So he still signed it but she added:

http://www.oann.com/judge-roy-moore-accuser-admits-to-forging-part-of-yearbook-note/

Why didn't she disclose that from the very beginning?