Politico: Rand Back to Being Rand

CPUd

Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
22,978
Notice their 'unnamed strategist' has moved on since Rand suspended his campaign, and they are back to doing direct interviews with Rand.

Rand back to being Rand

After his presidential campaign flamed out, the Kentucky senator returns to his libertarian roots.

By Burgess Everett
04/24/16 06:48 PM EDT


During his ill-fated presidential run, Rand Paul tried to stretch his brand of libertarianism to appeal to a broader audience. He talked tougher about engaging the Islamic State, undercut diplomacy with Iran and called for cutting domestic programs to pay for more defense spending.

Now, nearly three months after he pulled the plug on a presidential campaign that peaked at least a year too soon, Paul has resumed his role as the Senate’s libertarian-minded contrarian. And the 53-year-old eye doctor appears quite content, relieved of any need to soft-pedal his ideas for a national audience and ready to settle in to the Senate for the long haul.

In a recent interview in his Capitol office, adorned with magazine covers documenting the Kentucky Republican’s meteoric rise, a relaxed Paul lounged in a chair and spoke with excitement about the prospect of being the Senate’s leading libertarian voice on international policy and surveillance issues for another six years. He’s favored to win reelection this fall and scoffed at criticisms leveled by his Democratic opponent that he’s running a permanent presidential campaign, with his Senate seat as a launchpad.

Though he wouldn’t slam the door shut on another national bid, Paul sounded wary, saying it would be a “surprise” if it happened.

“It’s hard to ask somebody who just spent a lot of effort being here and there and being everywhere in between about doing it again. It’s not something that I can immediately say, ‘Oh my goodness, I’m looking forward to 2020,’” Paul said, even as he conceded that “2020 would be perfect for an ophthalmologist.”

“It’s a never say never,” Paul said, but “really all I can see in the near-term future is making sure I do a good job for Kentucky. I’m running for reelection, and then I want to be a big voice in the Senate.”

...
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/rand-back-senate-222281
 
His seat was never at risk, he is essentially running unopposed. In February, he had bigger reasons to end it.

I saw a list of the respective debts of the failed candidates a while back, and Rand was one of the few not in the red. It looked like he pulled the plug just about when he had to. Its just a sad quirk that the Senate reelection fell in 2016, so that he was kinda forced to deal with so many different issues, fundraising, ect...
 
Why do you say this? He went all-in in Iowa and came in 5th there. What else was he supposed to do?

I remember someone else who took 5th in Iowa and continued on in 2008 and gave birth to a whole liberty movement.

Just saying.
 
I remember someone else who took 5th in Iowa and continued on in 2008 and gave birth to a whole liberty movement.

Just saying.

True. But they were running different type campaigns (Ron's were educational, Rand was running to win), against different challengers. Rand's campaign never caught fire like 08 and 12, Trump deprived the oxygen, and then there was the Senate seat to tend to - not that Rand really needed to worry about it for a while, but after Iowa, the calls would have gotten progressively louder until it did become an issue. And with Trump surging, it became obvious that we needed a liberty bulwark in the Senate if we couldnt have that man as President.

What we might never know for sure is, if Rand was not up for Senate re-election, had he stayed in till it was Kasich, Cruz, Rand and Trump, would Rand have seen a rallying around him with him being a possibility at a convention? My guess is under such a scenario, Rand would have outpaced Kasich but taken Neocon heat from Cruz, all to the detriment of the general anti-trump side, with Trump hitting his magic number. But, if Trump had fallen short, then maybe Rand would have had a chance at the convention.
 
All in all, probably for the best.

He is a great senator.

I know this isn't saying much, but he is certainly the best senator of our era and almost certainly the best Senator of all time.

We'll be a helluva lot worse off when he decides he's had enough of this bullcrap
 
His worry about losing his senate seat is why he dropped out so early. Disappointing.

Who put that into your head?

His seat is fine, he bowed out early before it got embarrassing (like many other candidates), he isn't running a scorched earth campaign, he still has a great career ahead of him and the potential to run again when the time is right.

Ron in 2012 didn't even want to run and he knew he was running an educational campaign so it was natural he went all the way, and then retired from congress shortly after that.
 
Rand never stopped being Rand except in the imagination of the media and those who bought their narratives. Other than that, interesting article!
 
Never should have abandoned them in the first place.

That is why he lost miserably. If he went full blown libertarian it would have been so antithetical to everything about Donald Trump, so much so that I think he would have become the obligate alternative front runner, instead of Cruz's quasi-libertarian views.
 
Never should have abandoned them in the first place.

That is why he lost miserably. If he went full blown libertarian it would have been so antithetical to everything about Donald Trump, so much so that I think he would have become the obligate alternative front runner, instead of Cruz's quasi-libertarian views.

I don't think it's possible to win a modern GOP primary running as a libertarian, especially after how they treated Ron in 2008 and 2012. You see how people rail against "SJWs", that's how rank-and-file GOPs see libertarians.
 
I think Senator Paul is a great Senator but I have to agree with some of the posters above me. He should have never pushed his principles aside in order to appease the morons in the GOP. Sticking by your principle inspires people to stand in the rain and snow to hold your banners and signs. Conformity? Not so much.

Conformity is the opposite of courage. Even a dead fish can go with the flow.
 
Never should have abandoned them in the first place.

That is why he lost miserably. If he went full blown libertarian it would have been so antithetical to everything about Donald Trump, so much so that I think he would have become the obligate alternative front runner, instead of Cruz's quasi-libertarian views.

Wow why aren't you paid to give these opinions!? Oh...nevermind.. :toady:
 
Back
Top