Political commentator Jack Hunter, FreedomWorks Director Austin Petersen attack Alex Jones

A typical response from a troll when confronted with the truth. Care to get more creative? Youre boring.

Do you have any proof that it is the truth?

Btw, before you accuse me of "de-railing", your buddy actually started the de-railing, and I started the thread.

Maybe I am boring, can't say the same about you though, some of the shit you believe cracks me up.
 
Last edited:
I like both of them. Not really an Alex Jones fan, only on some of the things he does. (Like gun control rants!)
 
I agree. It would be great. But, as you say it has been going on for years so I have my doubts. I'd like to feel that I've done my part by staying away from my "hot point" issue, "Religion." Perhaps everyone could just pick one issue that causes division for them and at least try to steer clear from it.

cat.jpg
 
attachment.php

ROFL. Well, it's your choice.
 
Some guy posted a screen cap of his profile at sugardaddie dot com and it was hilarious! Looked to be legit.. he's out trolling.
Austin is a liberty guy, there is no question about that.

But Sugar Daddy.com?!!? I gotta see the profile for this, I'm sure it's hilarious. PLEASE link to it!
 
As far as I know this is the largest mainstream (for lack of a better term) audience that Jones has ever been in front of.

No, not even close. Piers Morgan only has 320,000 viewers at best. AJ has been on way higher rated shows. The View has a way higher rating.
 
Austin is a liberty guy, there is no question about that.

But Sugar Daddy.com?!!? I gotta see the profile for this, I'm sure it's hilarious. PLEASE link to it!

some guy posted it on Facebook.. his screen name is Climbhigher on that site..... it is hilarious.. he blocked me for making fun of it..

Austin is not liberty.. he's a Rubio neocon light interventionist... screw him.
 
Austin is not liberty.. he's a Rubio neocon light interventionist... screw him.

Do you have a source for his neoconservative posts? Probably not, because he isn't one. "Neocon" is very overused on here. If anyone who disagrees with Ron Paul on foreign policy is a neocon, then there really aren't that many people who aren't neocons. Under the broad definition of "neocon" used on RPF, even Pat Buchanan and Robert Taft would be classified as neocons.

I am concerned if he is an interventionist though (you can be an interventionist without being a neocon). Do you have a source for his interventionist posts?

He says he is non-interventionist here: http://www.facebook.com/ProducerPetersen/posts/466541800071472
Doesn't even sound like a Jacksonian interventionist, let alone a neoconservative.
 
Last edited:
Source? Like him on FB and read through all that crap yourself and make up your own mind, don't listen to me.

Yes he's 90% liberty, but the other neocon stuff is a deal breaker for me.
 
He defends hellfire bombings on civilian populations as long as the state says they are acting in self-defense. So fuck whatever he is, whatever you want to call it.
 
He defends hellfire bombings on civilian populations as long as the state says they are acting in self-defense. So fuck whatever he is, whatever you want to call it.

Exactly... and if you retaliate against hellfire bombings you are a terrorist. Same old bullshit.
 
Subtitle of the article

The attempted commandeering of the cause of liberty should be rejected at every turn, says Austin Petersen

I couldn't agree more, Mr. Petersen. The question is, who is commandeering whom?
 
Back
Top