2young2vote
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,852
If nothing had happened the children would have grown up and continued living there outside society and nobody would have known. I don't see a problem with what she did.
That's so awful. Doesn't anyone understand that things can't get better with the primary caretaker being held? It costs the government scarce resources to do this, now the woman will resent the government even more, her kids probably will, too - and the family's going to go through a lot of strain, possibly breaking up and really messing up the kids' lives.GUILTY! Sentenced to prison.
Gross said the children were home-schooled, but Ward said he could find no evidence of it. Parents of home-schooled children are required by law to register with the district in which they live, provide evidence of immunizations and follow approved curricula.
Gross said Bowers has studied more than 70 religions and adheres to a faith related to Islam.
"She essentially doesn't show her face, except to her husband," Gross said. He said the family opposes vaccinations "based on some beliefs about impurity and pricks of the skin."
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=12260726&page=2
I'm sorry, but there's a difference between living off the grid and denying your kids health care and an education. The way these kids were raised does not sound normal. Did they have friends? Did they go outside?
The way these kids were raised does not sound normal.
Before sentencing, Renn said that while Bowers "was living quite a number of years outside of society, she apparently did it crime free."
Renn said he needed to balance a number of "interests" in fashioning a sentence. He said society has an interest to make sure the crimes do not go unpunished.
"She does not pose a danger to society," he said. "Unfortunately, we can't say the same for her own children."
He said while he predicted there was little likelihood of her repeating this type of offense, "we believe there is a need for incarceration."
They lived outside society, hidden from the world in a squalid row house with no heat, electricity or running water. They had no birth certificates, no schooling, no immunizations or evidence of medical care _ nothing whatsoever to prove their existence.
It's always disappointing when that happens.I see this thread is bringing out the Statists.
they probably locked them in a basement or something. if that is the case, more power to CPS
I'm sorry, but there's a difference between living off the grid and denying your kids health care and an education. The way these kids were raised does not sound normal. Did they have friends? Did they go outside?
If a local community wants to have some form of child protective services, then they should be able to. I don't support it, but they can if they want.
“By wanting to protect the children so much it caused them the harm of not being socialized,” commented her attorney, Ron Gross, “but at the end of it, according to Children and Youth these kids are nice, polite so obviously she did something right hiding them underground.”
Did the children have medical problems when they were hunted down and stolen? The children knew how to grow a garden and make their own food, and they enjoyed it and miss doing that with their mother. How many can sustain themselves who attend state schools?
I'm sorry, but there's a difference between living off the grid and denying your kids health care and an education. The way these kids were raised does not sound normal. Did they have friends? Did they go outside?
See, your rep is in the negatives because you don't understand the basic fact that keeping government out of people's lives is far more important than having a way to help children who are abused by their parents and/or denied life-saving medical care due to ideological reasons.