Points that NEED to be communicated to voters

[LibertyEagle]

I have these 2 concerns:

1. There is still a huge misunderstanding by a whole lot of people about Paul's foreign policy being dangerous. They need the dots connected and badly. Paul has been given the opportunity to say which foreign policy experts agree with him, but he didn't mention a one. It was unfortunate, since a number agree with him.

2. Older Americans need to be reassured that Paul will not end Social Security and Medicare. There have been too many claims by the other candidates that he will and Paul doesn't consistently stress this point when he mentions cutting 1 trillion dollars the first year.

The next 2 are not really concerns for NH, but they will be for SC.

3. Many people misunderstand what a President Paul would do about drugs. They have formed pictures in their heads that little Billy and Susie will be able to buy heroin at the corner store. President Paul would decriminalize drugs at the federal level, ending the federal war on drugs and meddling by the federal government into the drug laws of each state. All 50 states have drug laws right now and they would still have them after Paul got the federal government out of the drug business.

4. Many people misunderstand what President Paul would do about abortion. He would not just leave it up to the 50 states to decide for themselves. What he wants to do is to have a federal law that defines life beginning at conception. What this would do is make it murder if someone took that life. Where the states come in, is that it would be up to them to prosecute and punish said murder, as they do most every other murder case under the sun.
http://stevedeace.com/news/iowa-politics/open-letter-from-personhood-usa-to-ron-paul/

If these things would be clarified, I think Paul would get far more Republican support and that includes with the "Social Conservatives".

 

[Watchmen for Ron Paul]

You've brought up some key points and I agree with you. I hope we hear more about jobs soon also

 

[sunnx]

Will RP campaign take suggestions? Could we start another SuperPac for RP in time?

I agree..have been thinking much the same!

I vote for You to be let onto the RP campaign staff!


I've tried sending suggestions to the RP campaign directly, but doubt they get taken serious enough or get passed on.
They probably get lots of emails and don't have it set up where they get passed along.

How can we get the RP campaign look at to these suggestions or look at all the good suggestions in this section?

Here's an idea: Start another SuperPac for RP and get it working before March 3 Super Tuesday




.

 

[brandt]

A couple of points that need to be made that Dr. Paul hasn't addressed clearly enough.

1. What would he do, as President, if the Congress of the United States issued a declaration of war against Iran? I think that his answer woudl get rid of some of the wrong-headed attacks on his foreign policy approaches.

2. What would he do, as President, to prosecute the wealthiest when they violate the law? So many see the Republican party as the Wall Street party and we have all see major criminals walk away with massive bonuses. Perhaps this opinion should not be aired because of the danger involved.

I sometimes worry about Dr. Paul's safety.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

A couple of points that need to be made that Dr. Paul hasn't addressed clearly enough.

1. What would he do, as President, if the Congress of the United States issued a declaration of war against Iran? I think that his answer woudl get rid of some of the wrong-headed attacks on his foreign policy approaches.

2. What would he do, as President, to prosecute the wealthiest when they violate the law? So many see the Republican party as the Wall Street party and we have all see major criminals walk away with massive bonuses. Perhaps this opinion should not be aired because of the danger involved.

I sometimes worry about Dr. Paul's safety.

Absolute fastest way to lose the anti-war vote is doing that.

 

[brandt]

I disagree. If Dr. Paul is a strict constitutionalist, that we know he is, he could easily make the case for it. The unfortunate idea that Congressman Paul is completely against war and soft on defense could be addressed if the legalities of the use of military force were exposed and discussed. It would also allow the opportunity to discuss the fact that there hasn't been a declared war since WWII and the extended costs of these actions because there is no definition of victory.