PIMCO: ‘Disorderly Decline’ of Dollar Cannot Be Ruled Out

hugolp

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
5,207
PIMCO: ‘Disorderly Decline’ of Dollar Cannot Be Ruled Out

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601083&sid=a83XY0Ek_Bvo

‘Disorderly Decline’ of Dollar Cannot Be Ruled Out

By Matthew Brown

Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) -- A “disorderly decline” of the dollar, leading to the end of its reserve-currency status, cannot be ruled out, Pacific Investment Management Co. said.

An orderly dollar decline is the “most likely scenario,” Richard Clarida, a Newport-Beach, California-based global strategic adviser at Pimco, wrote in a note to clients today. “A disorderly decline, while unlikely, cannot be ruled out.”

The Dollar Index, used by InterContinental Exchange Inc. to measure the U.S. currency against the euro, pound, yen, Swedish krona, Canadian dollar and Swiss franc, lost 7.4 percent this year and 35 percent since the beginning of 2002. It rose 6 percent in 2008 as investors bought dollar assets, including Treasuries, as a haven from the global financial turmoil.

A collapse in the value of the dollar would jeopardize its status as the world’s reserve currency, Pimco said. If the dollar loses that “privilege,” U.S. companies may have to issue debt in foreign currencies and risk losing money as the dollar weakens, Clarida said. Currently, they profit when the U.S. currency falls.

The decline in the dollar’s value delivered a capital gain to U.S. investors of $443 billion in 2007, and more than $1 trillion between 2002 and 2007, as the relative value of their foreign investments rose, Clarida said. The rise of the dollar in 2008 lost U.S. investors $720 billion, he said.
 
Do you think that it makes a big difference between orderly decline and disorderly decline.

Decline is decline.
 
Do you think that it makes a big difference between orderly decline and disorderly decline.

Decline is decline.

I supose orderly means a steady decline in time, with a bottom. A disorderly decline probably means everybody dumping the dollar and the currency going to 0.

Non of the options is good, but there is a difference.
 
One means the gradual decline of the American Empire, the other means the U.S. becoming a failed state.
 
If you had billions of US dollars in your reserves, as many countries do, would you enjoy watching a 'gradual decline' of the value of those reserves? I don't think so. You would probably start converting those reserves into something of value. Just because the decline has been gradual over the last 8 years doesn't mean it will continue that way for the next 8 years.
 
Oh Dear... Where will Richard Clarida & Bill Gross put all those Billions they made off their well engineered lobbyied plan in Washington DC for at Fannie and Freddie's $100's of Billions in Bailouts and they are insolvent?

I guess Overseas... No one wants to hold FRNs, except the Central Banks. It's a race to the bottom. Hold/Accumulate hard assets. Jim Rogers has it right... We should all become farmers. ;)
 
Back
Top