PHOTO: Ron Paul Really Did Get Glitter Bombed Yesterday!

[Revolution9]

You're kinda doing the same thing....'your community'..

This guy is part of our community. His biggest identifyer in life might not be being gay. Each individual is different.

What community am I identified with that uses it's moniker to denote their preference in sex acts?. I am single. That is all you know about what I do in my bedroom.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

It's not just about what you do in the bedroom. For many, it is about the person you go home to. My life with my husband is about our family and friends, supporting each other's ideas, earning our living, and supporting each other when things are difficult. What we do in the bedroom is a small part of the whole. It is the same for a gay person.

Ummm..no. Most gay men go home to their apartment. Where this fallacy of a community of couples has a connection to reality on the ground in gay enclaves is beyond me. I lived in the thick of it and I knew only two couples that had been together any length of time out of hundreds I knew in the West Village and Atlanta, LA, Toronto and Montreal over a couple of decades.

I don't care what you do in the bedroom. So much so that I don't wanna think about it or have any trailing imagery left in my head. I really could give a crike about the childish flaunting in whomever's face with their sex habits. I don't like it from guys I am around ..and I ain't no frikkin' prude, but I guess I was just brought up with good manners or there was hell to pay from the drill sargeant dad.

Rev9

 

[tbone717]

We should do currency bombs with shredded FRN's

 

[cstarace]

Ummm..no. Most gay men go home to their apartment. Where this fallacy of a community of couples has a connection to reality on the ground in gay enclaves is beyond me. I lived in the thick of it and I knew only two couples that had been together any length of time out of hundreds I knew in the West Village and Atlanta, LA, Toronto and Montreal over a couple of decades.

Now you're just being an asshole. Again, collectivism at its finest. Not that I want to get into my personal experiences, but to once again prove you wrong, I guess I will. I'm only seventeen (around the age that everyone says I'm supposed to be the most promiscuous?) and my only serious relationship I was able to maintain for the upwards of a year. Not that it's any sort of great feat, but it's pretty damn good considering high school standards, even amongst "heterosexuals".

So what've you provided an example of? Someone characterizing an entire group of individuals who happen to share one particular character trait and painting them all with one brush.

You're wrong, and it's not even really a discussion.

 

[NoPants]

I didn't know getting glitter bombed was a bad thing. The only down side is convincing Carol he wasn't at a strip club getting lap dances.

 

[Live Free or Die]

We should do currency bombs with shredded FRN's

I like that! You can buy that junk by the bag.

 

[FreedomProsperityPeace]

They should've been throwing glitter at President Obama back when he said marriage is between a man and a woman to Rick Warren, and when he opposed ending Don't Ask Don't Tell in court. Glitter bombers are partisan hypocrites.

 

[RonPaulMyPresident]

The person who did that is ignorant. Ron Paul is the most tolerant of gays out of all 4 GOP candidates.

 

[sirachman]

removed

 

[brushfire]

 

[FrankRep]

Ron Paul glitter bombed 2/6/12

 

[amisspelledword]

how do you guys know who did this? and is OWS really anti-Paul? why? *lost*

 

[jmdrake]

So the occupiers interrupt his rallies and he's the only one that will stop the corporate bailouts and corrupt federal reserve? And now the gay activists glitter bomb the only candidate (including Obama) that wants the federal government out of marriage?

The gay marriage movement isn't about "marriage freedom". Gays are already free to marry. That movement is about "marriage rights" as in "a right to the 'goodies' the federal government doles out to married couples." It's about social security and being able to file income tax as a married couple and being able to force employers to give them married couple health insurance. Ron Paul is about getting rid of the income tax, (eventually) privatizing social security and decoupling health insurance from employment. (The only reason health insurance is tied to employment is originally because of FDR wage freezes and currently because of income tax reasons). Every other marriage "benefit" a gay couple can confer upon itself through contract. But that would mean expecting people to look out for their own interests instead of having the government do that for them.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Why are these people so uninformed?

 

[jmdrake]

how do you guys know who did this? and is OWS really anti-Paul? why? *lost*

OWS is made up of a lot of individuals with no real focus some of whom like Paul and some who hate him.

 

[Danke]

Missed.

Limp wristed.

 

[ZanZibar]

I was there, Ron didn't even seem to give it a first thought, much less a second thought.