NorthCarolinaLiberty
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2010
- Messages
- 12,674
His business profits by selling pessimism.
I never heard of this Schiff person, but he can't be any worse that the people selling false optimism.
His business profits by selling pessimism.
July represents 18 consecutive months of at least a 20% year-over-year decline in the national inventory of foreclosed homes.
All but 2 states posted double-digit declines in foreclosures year over year. The District of Columbia saw a 6.3% decline and the state of Wyoming saw a 14.6% increase in foreclosures year over year.
Thirty-one states show declines in year-over-year foreclosure inventory of greater than 30%, with Arizona and Utah experiencing declines at 49% each.
The 5 states with the highest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of all mortgaged homes were: New Jersey (5.7%), Florida (4.8%), New York (4.3%), Hawaii (3.0%) and Maine (2.7%).
The 5 states with the lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of all mortgaged homes were: Nebraska (0.4%), Alaska (0.4%), Arizona (0.5%), Minnesota (0.5%) and North Dakota (0.5%).
You are right. The world is coming to an end. Life sucks and just gets worse. Why should anybody be happy?
Some say Schiff predicted the Great Recession. He is always predicting the next Great Recession- he got "lucky" once. He eventually was right once- now some think he is practically some economic "god".
People on TV say all kinds of things. They're practically gods just because they're on TV.
Soon! They promise! Buy their products ...
That's Peter!
Life is always good and bad. Even the "good old days" really weren't that great. But I think focusing only on the bad is too depressing so I do try to counterbalance it with some of the "good news".
So you watch/know about this Peter fellow. You are also espousing the modern day life philosophy of balance. Maybe you should turn off the TV and get an original thought.
China's economy is slowing as well.
http://fortune.com/2014/04/16/china-has-far-bigger-challenges-than-a-slowing-economy/
What is your latest original thought if you don't mind?
That isn't true at all. The economy is not that simple. Where those dollars go, both in terms of economic sector and area of the globe, as well as the speed with which those dollars move, play a far more important role than the amount of increase or decrease in monetary base.
Let's defend a man who was right exactly once by using a blog that has never been right.
Has it ever been wrong?
If you consider unnecessarily long, sometimes pointless abominations against good writing to be wrong then yes, constantly.
If you want to limit this to just factually wrong, then although nothing it has ever predicted has come true, it never gives specifics or a timeframe, so you could say it is 'not wrong' but also 'not right' so long as you decide that when the author says "soon" or "very soon" it means 'more than 6 years from now.'