People who say gold is a bad investment because of 1979/80 spike

No lol I'm fully on your side. I am saying that people who see 1980 as a reason why gold sucks are ignorant. Lol

LOL thats what I thought but God you never know sometimes......:D

As problematic as Federal money-printing is, it's still something we can correct through better leadership.
Paul......this will NEVER happen....sorry.......the history of man on this issue is why the founders put gold and silver as coinage IN the Constitution.

Paul.....when in history did america or any nation correct the problem such as this through leadership.....
(I would also love to hear your answers in correcting the 100 Trillion dollar debt) washingtondc needs you!!
 
Last edited:
I've heard that argument brought up before, and it doesn't hold water. The spike in the early 80s was over a very short time frame, less than a year if I recall correctly. We're not seeing anything like that - gold has risen steadily over the past decade.

As far as when to dump your gold or silver, that's probably going to depend entirely on your situation. It could be that you find yourself in a position where you have to sell it, even if it's not an opportune time, because you need goods. If you're someone that has stacked a lot though, it seems like the best time to sell is when durable goods hit bottom. Commodities are already going up fast now, that rate of change will only increase. As that process continues, people will have to devote increasing percentages of their income of food and energy. They will care less about purchasing (and more about selling) durable goods - your TVs, your gadgets, real estate. At the height of it all, you'll be able to buy a whole lot of property or electronics with very little gold/silver/gas.

Will that height be 1-to-1 dow/gold? I don't know. I mean, if it gets to the point that everyone is dumping stocks, yeah, it will happen again, but I don't know that the particular inflection point correlates with peak gold.
 
You can count me as one of the people skeptical of buying gold now based on my experience with it in the 1980 bubble. I heard a lot of the same things I hear now- "this time it is different". "Gold will go to $2000 or $5000!" "You can't lose buying gold". Similar things were also said during the Stock Market bubble and the Housing bubble. This track record makes me less willing to buy gold today. I was talked into buying near the peak- paying over $600 for one ounce and about $700 for another. Adjusting for inflation, I am still losing money on that- 30 years later. Will it go down? Will it go up? Nobody can say for sure. But having been burned before, I am not going to put money on it being different this time. This is a personal experience and opinion. I know there are many who disagree and buy gold for different reasons. That is fine for them- it is just not inviting to me.
i agree, but your overlooking silver. silver i think has a very low risk, even if the worse case happens (to our point of view, such as a real budget cut) the low in history of silver has been around 10 dollars and today its around 25 dollar. so at worse case, your looking at a net loss of around 15 dollars per silver, worse case scenario. vs gold where it can drop like a rock.
 
Oh, I'm not. I think silver has more upside, which is why I buy it over gold. That, and I don't really have enough money to buy gold. It's easier to buy some silver pieces every now, at least in my circumstances. Poor man's gold, after all.
 
i agree, but your overlooking silver. silver i think has a very low risk, even if the worse case happens (to our point of view, such as a real budget cut) the low in history of silver has been around 10 dollars and today its around 25 dollar. so at worse case, your looking at a net loss of around 15 dollars per silver, worse case scenario. vs gold where it can drop like a rock.

If silver goes from $25 to $10, you have lost 60%- not $15. If gold is $1300, that would be the same as it going down to $520. While that sounds like more in terms of dollars, you are losing the same. $1000 in either would be down to $400 if the numbers you listed were to happen. Both could go up or go down. Nothing is free of risk.

Given how stable the gold price was from about 1982 through at least 2002, it certainly looks like a bubble graph to me. Try comparing it to housing prices (which also grew over several years) or the stock bubble charts. Pretty similar. How long it will go up- nobody knows but one thing is certain, it will not go on forever.

au75-pres.gif

http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx

Housing Prices Chart:
united_states.png

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqrguz/housingbubble/
 
Bubbles

If silver goes from $25 to $10, you have lost 60%- not $15. If gold is $1300, that would be the same as it going down to $520. While that sounds like more in terms of dollars, you are losing the same. $1000 in either would be down to $400 if the numbers you listed were to happen. Both could go up or go down. Nothing is free of risk.

Given how stable the gold price was from about 1982 through at least 2002, it certainly looks like a bubble graph to me. Try comparing it to housing prices (which also grew over several years) or the stock bubble charts. Pretty similar. How long it will go up- nobody knows but one thing is certain, it will not go on forever.

au75-pres.gif

http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx

Housing Prices Chart:
united_states.png

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqrguz/housingbubble/

The housing bubble and the dotcom bubble were both driven by the direct influx of newly created currency into the market theough the banking system. To equate the increase in the price of gold with those bubbles you need to explain how newly created currency is driving up gold prices by entering the market directly into gold. It still could be driven by hysteria, but that is a different animal than an inflation bubble.
 
If silver goes from $25 to $10, you have lost 60%- not $15. If gold is $1300, that would be the same as it going down to $520. While that sounds like more in terms of dollars, you are losing the same. $1000 in either would be down to $400 if the numbers you listed were to happen. Both could go up or go down. Nothing is free of risk.

Given how stable the gold price was from about 1982 through at least 2002, it certainly looks like a bubble graph to me. Try comparing it to housing prices (which also grew over several years) or the stock bubble charts. Pretty similar. How long it will go up- nobody knows but one thing is certain, it will not go on forever.

au75-pres.gif

http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx

Housing Prices Chart:
united_states.png

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqrguz/housingbubble/



I disagree. Look at the parabolic spike from gold in 1979-80. That is a quantum leap of "value" as a % over MAX 2 years.

The current rise in price of gold is stretched over a decade, seen major consolidation points and the near quadrupling of it's nominal value is almost identically following the timeline that the M0 and M1 base money's have been quadrupled.

We live in very unique times and although gold/silver will likely go into a parabolic frenzy- that parabola has yet to begin. It may not goin into a parabolic spike, but I think it will.
 
Gold is NOT an investment:

http://www.kitco.com/ind/stansberry/oct262010.html

What You don't Know About Gold: The Biggest Myths on the Gold Market

The Daily Crux: Brian, as you know, we probably get more questions and reader feedback on gold than on any other subject here at The Crux... And we've noticed there are quite a few myths and misconceptions about gold out there. Can you go over some of the big ones for us?

Brian Hunt: Sure. Probably the biggest misconception investors have toward gold is they see it as an investment.

They'll listen to the folks on CNBC pick apart and analyze every $30 move in the metal, just as a move in crude oil or stocks or bonds would be analyzed. They'll check the price quote every day... to see how their "investment" in gold is performing.

This just isn't the way to view gold.

Gold isn't an investment. A thousand shares of health care company Johnson & Johnson is an investment. J&J pays a dividend. It's a business that's going to grow its cash flows and pay a portion of those cash flows out to it shareholders.

An income producing rental property is an investment. Bought at the right price, a rental property will return all of your original capital in the form of rent checks... and the rest is gravy.

Gold isn't like those two examples at all. Gold is money. It's been used for money for thousands of years because it's easily divisible, it's easily transportable, it has intrinsic value, it's durable, and its form is consistent around the world. And as Doug Casey reminds us, it's a good form of money because governments can't print it up on a whim. You can't "Bernanke your way to wealth" with gold.

Gold doesn't pay interest or a dividend. It doesn't have profit margins. Your gold holdings amount to lumps of metal held in storage.

The sooner the investor realizes that gold is money... and not a conventional investment, the better off he'll be. It's just a timeless form of money. That's it.

Crux: People can also view it as insurance, right?

Hunt: Right. Since gold is real wealth that you can hold in your hand, it's also "crisis insurance"... or "wealth insurance." Like regular insurance, you buy gold and hope you don't have to use it.

Gold is insurance against governments doing foolish things with their finances. It's going to hold its value if governments do crazy things that lower the value of their paper money, like the United States is doing with the dollar.

A currency is sort of like the share price of a country. Over time, if a country manages its finances well... if it produces more than it consumes, saves plenty of money, and maintains a modest amount of debt, its currency will rise.

If a country consumes more than it produces... if it spends lots of money, and borrows a lot in order to do all of that spending, its currency will fall in value. While currencies fluctuate for all sorts of reasons in the short term, over the long term, countries that manage their checkbooks will enjoy strong currencies. Countries that mismanage their checkbooks see their currencies plummet.

The U.S. dollar has lost around 33% of its value in the past 10 years. This decline is because the world is waking up to the awful situation America has borrowed and spent its way into. Meanwhile, gold has climbed from $300 per ounce to $1,375 an ounce.

Also, consider that the dollar has lost 7% of its value in the past month or so... which is a stupendous plunge for a major currency.

It's fallen by that amount because our chief central banker basically told the world last month that he'd print lots of money in order to allow our current political regime to spend lots of money... and to bail out every American who can't balance a checkbook or show up for work. This recent dollar decline sent gold from $1,200 an ounce to $1,375.

My friend Porter Stansberry calls our current dollar situation a full-blown crisis. He's probably right. Gold is surging as a result of this crisis. It's demonstrating its value as crisis insurance.

I wish I lived in a country that produces more than it consumes... that values personal responsibility and saving money. That has a government that believes in fiscal responsibility. But I don't.

About half this country is on the government dole in some form or another. Over 40 million people are on food stamps. People are being paid by the government not to work. The people employed by the government enjoy huge, outsized salaries for what they do.

This situation is a crisis. That's why I own gold... and recommend people keep at least 5% or 10% of their wealth in gold.

But here's where I differ from the average gold owner: I'd love to see gold fall down to $300 or $400 per ounce. I'd love it if the value of my crisis insurance would fall, rather than skyrocket... just like I don't want my family's house to burn down... or why I don't want someone to T-bone my car in an intersection.

But I look at the gang of clueless college professors, career politicians, and other types who have never held real world jobs occupying the White House and Congress... And when I consider that half of this country is on some form of government dole, I know there is no political will to reign in spending and borrowing.

Crux: Yes... we all need insurance from that. Do you think at least large institutional investors, like mutual fund companies, understand gold?

Hunt: Absolutely not. They are just as ignorant about gold as the average Joe on the street. They might even be worse.

From the early 1980s to 2000, nobody worried about insurance. Stocks and the economy boomed for nearly 20 years. Gold languished for a long time.

Its importance as real money – as a crisis hedge – was forgotten by most people... even by the supposedly smart folks who run big investment funds.

They learned their trade during a period of rising stock prices and falling gold prices, so they think gold is something right-wing nuts stockpile alongside canned food in a bomb shelter. It's amazing how a few decades of smooth sailing will make folks forget gold's importance as insurance against disasters.

I've heard lots of supposedly smart institutional investors pooh-pooh gold because it didn't perform well during the 1980s and 1990s. They'll post charts showing how it lagged behind stocks and real estate.

It's a silly comparison, because gold isn't an investment like stocks and real estate can be. Gold is just gold. Like I said, you own it and hope to never have to use it. You don't get it confused with a stock like Johnson & Johnson.

Crux: We think you've made your point. Any parting shots?

Hunt: Just one more. It involves another myth about gold... The belief that anyone knows where the heck it's going over the coming years.

Every day, you hear some guru claiming gold is going to $2,000 or $4,000... or even $10,000. Those kinds of price projections are just hot air. Nobody – not Warren Buffett or Ben Bernanke or George Soros – knows how high gold will go in the coming years.

It's tempting to make comparisons to other wild periods like the 1970s or the 1930s. But those historical comparisons aren't worth anything. And I'm going to catch hell for saying this, but they aren't worth anything because this time is different.

I know "this time is different" is a dirty phrase in the investment business – but given the U.S. debt situation, our runaway entitlement spending, Europe's massive debt problems, and the emergence of Asia as a wealthy gold accumulator – this is a different gold market than any market we've ever seen. I don't place any value on any past price action here... or any price projections... or any attempts to value it.

You can't value gold like a stock... where you'd say "I'll pay 10 times earnings for gold." You can't value it like a rental property and say "I'll pay eight times annual rent for gold."

The important thing for investors is to forget about the noise you hear on the Internet and television, and just steadily accumulate ounces of gold. Try to buy a little more each quarter or each year.

Don't see it as an investment. See it as money... as real wealth you can hold in your hand. That's how it's been seen for thousands of years. It will eventually be re-discovered by the general public in the coming years.

Crux: Thanks for your time.

Hunt: My pleasure.
 
investment

Gold is not an investment in the sense that owning a dividend-paying stock or rental property is. But the upside in gold is not limited to the downside in the dollar. Yes, the conservative view of gold is as a store of value and hedge against inflation. But the Big Kahuna of gold upside is in the remonetization of gold. If gold resumes the place it has held for nearly all of history and becomes the world's currency again, then the upside is staggering. So I am hoping for a pull back first so I can buy some!
 
If you hold FRN's they lose value as the FED creates more money. Also, if you keep your FRNs in a bank, it benefits the bank because they fractional-reserve lend it. I don't think gold is in a bubble. I think the dollar is crashing. I'm hoping this is the beginning of the end of the paper dollar fraud. I'm not expecting to sell any gold unless I need cash to buy something.
 
If you hold FRN's they lose value as the FED creates more money. Also, if you keep your FRNs in a bank, it benefits the bank because they fractional-reserve lend it. I don't think gold is in a bubble. I think the dollar is crashing. I'm hoping this is the beginning of the end of the paper dollar fraud. I'm not expecting to sell any gold unless I need cash to buy something.

why not buy stuff with your gold?
if someone offered me gold to fix their computer, it would be done. (or silver or any worthy commodity)
 
Back
Top