People that formerly ridiculed conspiracy theories check in!

[Anti Federalist]

Never fails to amaze me when people who complain about g'ment misinformation indulge themselves so freely in the same practice.

Truth in this matter does not include controlled demolishion or some secret g'ment plot to make 9/11 happen.

So says you.

You also said that no government employees or "officials" were taking Cipro prior to the anthrax attacks.

And you were wrong.

Covering up ineptitude? Yes, I can agree with a g'ment conspiracy in that area, however.

Which is just as bad as letting it happen or making it happen on purpose.

Therefore, you should be on the same bandwagon as us LIHOP and MIHOP folks, demanding truth and accountability.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Bump just to rate this thread up

 

[AxisMundi]

Man, for not believing in conspiracy theories, Axis. You sure know a lot. Its like you dedicated yourself to being an anti-conspiracy theorist. Any reason? Are you like Bill Maher? You know, I dislike religion like he does, but I don't go around poking people just to be an asshole.

Oh and this line was priceless to me: "She was also unable to convince the 9/11 commission". Because they had no agenda.

Is Wikileaks a theory too? I mean, the evidence is just a "fabrication". Since if it was brought in front of a newly formed government run "Wiki Commission", I'm sure they wouldn't be convinced it proves anyone lied to the American people either.

Senior Member: October 2010. How does that work?

1. I despise misinformation. The entire 9/11 "Truthie" movement is nothing BUT misinformation. One cannot fight against misinformation without arming themselves with knowledge. I despise misinformation whether it is generated by my Elected Employees, the media, people so desperate to attack the g'ment that they make shit up, or people looking to make a quick buck off of the highly gullible.

2. Wikileaks must be viewed as a hostile source, and any and all information leaked examined and researched. To take Wikileaks at face value is no better than taking the g'ment at face value.

 

[AxisMundi]

So says you.

You also said that no government employees or "officials" were taking Cipro prior to the anthrax attacks.

And you were wrong.

Which is just as bad as letting it happen or making it happen on purpose.

Therefore, you should be on the same bandwagon as us LIHOP and MIHOP folks, demanding truth and accountability.

Firstly, let me clarify. I was laboring under the misconception that you were arguing that people were taking Cipro prior to 9/11. I believe I have already stood corrected on this point, and if not, do so now.

Secondly, there is no valid evidence suggesting that our Elected Employees "let it happen", let alone "making it happen".

 

[AxisMundi]

I'd really love to see him try.

There is nothing to debunk, actually.

Your side is attempting, in this piece of unrelated misdirection, to claim the BBC, a media organization, had prior access to information that no one else did, i.e. some controlled demolition of B7, when almost no one else in the world did.

 

[AxisMundi]

JM, he is not suffering from "cognitive dissonance".

CD is that state of mind that is best described as being agitated, nervous, panicked and sweaty, in a state of distress because you are being forced to hold two contradictory views, simultaneously, in your conscious and subconscious.

No, Axis has progressed well past that point, he now loves Big Brother, that mental distress is gone, blessed doublethink has now overcome CD, and if the regime says 2 plus 2 equals 5, well, by god, so it does.

Cognitive dissonance is the last indicator of a free mind. Once that's gone, then that person is gone as well.

Thank you for illustrating the level of intellectual dishonesty one must indulge themselves in to believe any of this controlled demolition nonsense.

 

[pcosmar]

AxisMundi

Ha Ha.

You funny.

 

[Chieppa1]

Wikileaks must be viewed as a hostile source, and any and all information leaked examined and researched. To take Wikileaks at face value is no better than taking the g'ment at face value.

No shit. So why do you believe the "g'ment" story at face value? Since all your responses I can hear on any news outlet or during the 08' election. What examination and research have you done?

 

[Chieppa1]

Thank you for illustrating the level of intellectual dishonesty one must indulge themselves in to believe any of this controlled demolition nonsense.

Thanks for the vague comment that doesn't explain why that is intellectual dishonesty. You said it yourself, "evidence that didn't convince the 9/11 Commission." Seems to me like you take their opinion on face value. 2 plus 2 equals 5.

 

[AxisMundi]

AxisMundi

Ha Ha.

You funny.

I am more than willing to listen to rational, reasonable arguments when they are presented.

Unfortunately for your camp, none have been offered to date.

 

[AxisMundi]

No shit. So why do you believe the "g'ment" story at face value? Since all your responses I can hear on any news outlet or during the 08' election. What examination and research have you done?

Please post any quotes from myself stating that I support the government's position in this matter.

What research? Each and every claim made that comes to my attention. Many times these are easily debunked as pure hysteria, other times it takes a little research.

The "molten steel" is an example of the latter.

 

[pcosmar]

I am more than willing to listen to rational, reasonable arguments when they are presented.

Unfortunately for your camp, none have been offered to date.

No you are not.
You are a fuckin' lier.

There has been much evidence, video, witness testimony, and documented research, but you ignore it all and ridicule any that presents them.

You are a troll.

AxisMundi can only hope to improve

Well,,there is always hope.

 

[VegasPatriot]

Please post any quotes from myself stating that I support the government's position in this matter.

Well then, why don't you clear up any misunderstandings and answer the following with a simple yes or no... Do you believe the "official" government position? If your answer is no... then why are you not calling for a new investigation?

 

[jmdrake]

Thank you for illustrating the level of intellectual dishonesty one must indulge themselves in to believe any of this controlled demolition nonsense.

Intellectual dishonesty is you not being able to admit that the BBC reported WTC 7 falling before it fell. You could have tried to explain your way around it. Maybe said "it was a lucky guess by Reuters" or some crap. Instead you just lied.

 

[RedBloodConservative]

Do you have any insight as to whether your views are the exception to the rule or do many other ex-mlitary understand that 9/11 was a false flag op at this point?

No I am not the exception... There are many former military that questioned it. Also alot of firefighters are questioning it.

I will post some links in a bit.

 

[crazyfacedjenkins]

I read Prison Planet and find myself saying "You know, Alex Jones has a point there."

 

[PatriotOne]

No I am not the exception... There are many former military that questioned it. Also alot of firefighters are questioning it.

I will post some links in a bit.

Fantastic. You made my night and I look forward to your links.

 

[AxisMundi]

Intellectual dishonesty is you not being able to admit that the BBC reported WTC 7 falling before it fell. You could have tried to explain your way around it. Maybe said "it was a lucky guess by Reuters" or some crap. Instead you just lied.

I never stated they did not, feel free to provide a quote showing I did.

To clarify, what I stated was that the idea that the BBC knew of some plot to demolish B7 is simply laughable.

There was a lot going on at the time, mistakes in reporting happened.

This example just doesn't rise to the challenge of offering proof, especially when there isn;t a shred of proof to show that B7 was purposely demolished.

 

[agar]

I never stated they did not, feel free to provide a quote showing I did.

To clarify, what I stated was that the idea that the BBC knew of some plot to demolish B7 is simply laughable.

There was a lot going on at the time, mistakes in reporting happened.

This example just doesn't rise to the challenge of offering proof, especially when there isn;t a shred of proof to show that B7 was purposely demolished.

have a look at www.ae911truth.org

1400 verified Architects and Engineers on board the 911 truth bandwagon.

But my hunch is that you're a troll.

 

[AxisMundi]

have a look at www.ae911truth.org

1400 verified Architects and Engineers on board the 911 truth bandwagon.

But my hunch is that you're a troll.

Already seen it.

A degree does not eliminate gullability.