Paul vs. Santorum

[bobbyw24]

Daniel Larison January 4th, 2012

Neither Paul nor Santorum won last night (though Paul may come out ahead in the delegate count before it is all over), but they make for a much more interesting story than the dreadful winner, so my new column for The Week is a comparison of their views with an emphasis on their foreign policy disagreements:

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2012/01/04/paul-vs-santorum/

 

[mcgraw_wv]

If Paul goes after Santorum, Romney is the guaranteed winner. We need media buys which damage Romney's electibility, it's his only claim to votes right now, you don't win by beating Santorum, you win by beating Romney.

 

[CaptUSA]

If Paul goes after Santorum, Romney is the guaranteed winner. We need media buys which damage Romney's electibility, it's his only claim to votes right now, you don't win by beating Santorum, you win by beating Romney.

Yes, the campaign has said they're in a two-way race now. They'd be well-served to keep it that way from now on.

When Santorum comes in 4th in NH, his Iowa luster will have worn off. The next couple of debates are crucial.

 

[RIPLEYMOM]

^ This with footage of the 2007 presidential debate where Romney, McCain and Co. argue for a National ID card.

We need an ad where this NWO stuff is cleverly spelled-out - make it so the average citizen can put the pieces together w/out framing us as conspirators.

I read an article where the RFID chip was going to be required for food stamps. How many millions of Americans are on food stamps now???

This NDAA, SOPA stuff is ripe for the picking, and has everything to do with losing our liberties. He needs to be the first to address this.