Plague-of-Locutus
Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 106
I'd be on board if Ron came out and said he would pick Sarah Palin as his VP especially right now. A little media buzz going into Tampa would not hurt our chances in the slightest.
To show that he is still in the race.
In February 2009, Whitman announced her candidacy for Governor of California, becoming the third woman in a twenty year period to run for the office. She won the Republican primary in June 2010. The fourth wealthiest woman in the state of California with a net worth of $1.3 billion in 2010, she spent more of her own money on the race than any other political candidate spent on a single election in American history, spending $144 million total of her own fortune and $178.5 million including donors. Whitman lost to Jerry Brown in the November 2 election.
With Ron and Meg Whitman, we could carry California.
So do I. NO.Couple of things....
1) Santorum hates Romney.
That's not true at all. He is the embodiment of what Ronald Reagan only talked about.2) Ron Paul has nothing in common with any of the Republicans.
3) If we want to be serious about getting Paul the nomination, we need to compromise a bit. I'm sorry but Ron Paul announcing Napolitano, or Walter Williams as his VP isn't going to get the social conservatives to switch from Romney to Paul.
Santorum is horrible, I know this, but I'm looking at what is the most important right now, Obama/Biden vs Romney/Ryan or Obama/Biden vs Paul/Santorum. Which one would you choose?
- ML
I cannot believe the Palin love around here. What the hell does she have to do to prove to people that she's a blithering idiot? A statist blithering idiot, at that?
We need a successful business person to match Ron.
How about Meg Whitman:
She happens to be a BILLIONAIRE:
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meg_Whitman
Edit: And about 100X smarter than Palin.
Palin isn't 'my girl' but 'doesn't belong to Goldman Sachs' is a big deal with me, and the others I can think of do.
*GAG* <-- from California
Possibly better than santorum but only because santorum is so bad. The case for Palin is she really seems more independent and less bought, except for superficially. (yeah, superficially bought, like that phrase?)
but it should be between delegates and on the floor I think, if it is her. She ISN'T on board with Ron but if the situation came up, nor would anyone else be who could make it fly with the other delegates there, and she'd be better than most of those. Just my 2cents. Palin isn't 'my girl' but 'doesn't belong to Goldman Sachs' is a big deal with me, and the others I can think of do.
Instead, clickers were taken to a YouTube video of a Japanese man dressed in a pink tutu, thigh-high stockings and garters.
You gotta be kidding. She was taking their money when she was running for VP.
I prefer girls with their own money. Meg is a great choice.