Paul mentions Super Tuesday votes in CNBC interview (Video)

[nyrgoal99]

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000077713

 

[frickettz]

not quite a confirmation but yes you can tell he's skeptical..

 

[tod evans]

Please put it on youtube.

 

[bcreps85]

Title is a bit misleading. Had already seen it, and he doesn't quite "confirm" it. He does sort of allude to it, however, which is probably about all he can do without being ridiculed into oblivion.

 

[unknown]

"The only thing they know is inflating the currency".

Mothereffers.

"You bring to the table a point of view we dont often hear from people". Yah, its called the truth.

No b*tch, he's running to become the nominee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Beautifully said at 5:54.

RON PAUL ALWAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

F*CK everyone else.

 

[awake]

So did Obama..

 

[JJ2]

Bump. I was shocked to hear Paul go as far as he did. "We can put 4,000 people in a precinct, and come up with 2,000 votes!"

What's really unbelievable is how he can accuse the party of election fraud, and the TV hosts and rest of the media just ignore it!

 

[Keith and stuff]

The lady mentioned that when looking at 5 of the 10 Super Tuesday states, Paul didn't get any more youth votes than Santorum. Perhaps that is true but that doesn't include some of Paul's best states on Super Tuesday, like VT, ND, AK and ID. If you include those states, Paul did beat Santorum with youth votes.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

I think Paul knows the rigging has been constant ever since the Iowa Straw Vote (the only one the media covered like mad). Whenever the MSM focuses on a big contest that might yield Paul a victory or significant momentum, like night follows day, something "odd" keeps happening. A longish pause before the results are announced, a reversal of the exit polls or entrance polls, Paul voters turned away or not counted based on suddenly enforced technicalities, precincts or whole counties not counted, algo improbabilities always going in favor of Romney, etc.

Paul KNOWS the evidence is there, the question is what to do about it. I say continue on to the Republican convention, but announce a third party run on top of that, specifically as punishment to the party establishment for cheating him throughout this primary race, AND as leverage to win the GOP nomination. He may be planting the seeds for such an announcement by deftly making noises about vote rigging now.

 

[Immortal Technique]

 

[ronpaulhemp]

Good video. It really is unfortunate how they keep cheating Dr. Paul out of a win.

 

[Carson]

Good video. It really is unfortunate how they keep cheating Dr. Paul out of a win.

It is America that is being cheated.

 

[wgadget]

He said we need to start challenging the system ...the voting system, I presume?

He knows it's rigged.

 

[Carson]

Giant asteroid 2040!

We will be lucky to make it to November the way we have been gallivanting globally.

 

[floridasun1983]

You know when I watch these things, what strikes me is why the people don't demand more of the candidates. Ron Paul gives economics lessons. Newt talks about a 5 step program for every ill. Santorum talks about bombing Iran as the solution for everything. Romney wants to turn the government into a corporation. Its like watching a professor vs 3 burger flippers.

 

[Big Chuck]

As much as I hate seeing Paul lose, I have a hard time believing if fraud was occurring on such a rampant multi state level, that tangible evidence would not be easily discovered. How many people would have to be involved in such a feat? We're talking about literally hundreds of counties operated by their own low level party officials who have been in place for years. There would have been several thousand people in a position to blow the whistle on operation make sure Paul doesn't win, and tens of thousands of people watching them. A far simpler explanation is that the American public is comprised mostly of brain dead idiots. There is evidence to support that claim, but no evidence that supports the claim that election fraud has kept Paul from winning a state.

 

[sratiug]

As much as I hate seeing Paul lose, I have a hard time believing if fraud was occurring on such a rampant multi state level, that tangible evidence would not be easily discovered. How many people would have to be involved in such a feat? We're talking about literally hundreds of counties operated by their own low level party officials who have been in place for years. There would have been several thousand people in a position to blow the whistle on operation make sure Paul doesn't win, and tens of thousands of people watching them. A far simpler explanation is that the American public is comprised mostly of brain dead idiots. There is evidence to support that claim, but no evidence that supports the claim that election fraud has kept Paul from winning a state.

Are you forgetting that a Paul supporter was on local tv outing the stealing of the Iowa caucus for Romney from Santorum hours after the caucus and it did not become a story until weeks later when they needed a Santorum win to keep him in the race?

 

[JJ2]

I think Paul knows the rigging has been constant ever since the Iowa Straw Vote (the only one the media covered like mad). Whenever the MSM focuses on a big contest that might yield Paul a victory or significant momentum, like night follows day, something "odd" keeps happening. A longish pause before the results are announced, a reversal of the exit polls or entrance polls, Paul voters turned away or not counted based on suddenly enforced technicalities, precincts or whole counties not counted, algo improbabilities always going in favor of Romney, etc.

You forgot having to lie about your religious beliefs in order to vote (Adelson caucus).

 

[RickyJ]

As much as I hate seeing Paul lose, I have a hard time believing if fraud was occurring on such a rampant multi state level, that tangible evidence would not be easily discovered. How many people would have to be involved in such a feat? We're talking about literally hundreds of counties operated by their own low level party officials who have been in place for years. There would have been several thousand people in a position to blow the whistle on operation make sure Paul doesn't win, and tens of thousands of people watching them. A far simpler explanation is that the American public is comprised mostly of brain dead idiots. There is evidence to support that claim, but no evidence that supports the claim that election fraud has kept Paul from winning a state.

Big Chuck, there is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. If you fail to see it then you might be blind.

 

[123tim]

Well, you've said some pretty profound, and thought-provoking, things Dr. Paul. To conclude this interview, and to get our mind off of those thoughts, let me conclude by saying that there's a huge asteroid coming our way. in 2040.

//