Parents investigated for neglect after letting kids walk home alone

Of course they are guilty.

We are all guilty.

The only question is: what will the state find us guilty of.

Guilty of being Innocent of being Guilty.


For the crime of being Innocent of being Guilty. Yeah, makes absolutely no sense what so ever, but this is the way the Just-Us system works. Utterly deceptive twaddlespeak.
 
The Meitiv's are appealing.

Parents who let kids walk alone to appeal in neglect case

Paula Tolson, spokeswoman for the Maryland Department of Human Resources, said there are three possible findings after neglect investigations: ruled out, unsubstantiated or indicated. An unsubstantiated finding is made when there’s some information supporting child neglect, seemingly credible reports disagree or there isn’t enough information for a conclusion.

The first step in the appeals process is a conference involving a CPS supervisor, which can often resolve some issues, Tolson said.

XNN
 
“The world is actually even safer than when I was a child,"
This parent is wrong. The vile and vicious sorts are far more common than 40 years ago.
 
If they were smart, they'd appeal that from 10 states away.

Then they would be wanted for fleeing the state. Just like the couple in Washington state. This isn't for safety reasons as so many are lead to believe it is about control, period.
 
Police again pick up children, 6 and 10, of 'free-range' parents, take kids to child services

SILVER SPRING, Md. — Two suburban Washington, D.C., parents are under scrutiny again for letting their 6- and 10-year-old children play in a park and walk home alone in a case that has stirred debate about "free-range" parenting and government powers.

For the second time in four months, police picked up the children of Danielle and Alexander Meitiv on Sunday as they were walking home alone from a park that's nearly a mile from their house. This time, instead of bringing the children home, police took them directly to Child Protective Services.

"It's beyond ridiculous," Danielle Meitiv said Monday. "The world is safer today, and yet we imprison our children inside and wonder why they're obese and have no focus."

The Meitivs, who live 6 miles from Washington in Silver Spring, Maryland, believe in "free-range" parenting, which includes allowing their children to play and walk alone in the neighborhood to teach them self-reliance and responsibility.

Child Protective Services first began investigating the couple in December after police stopped the children midway through a 1-mile walk home from a different park after responding to a call from a concerned citizen. Police drove the children home but called Child Protective Services.

The Meitivs were notified in a February letter that they had been found responsible for "unsubstantiated neglect," a ruling that's made when there's some information supporting child neglect, seemingly credible reports disagree or there isn't enough information for a conclusion.

More at link:
http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/299540891.html

This is beyond Orwellian for someone like me who was a child in the 1950's
They will probably lose their kids. :(
 
MARYLAND MEITIVS CLEARED OF FIRST “NEGLECT” CHARGE

Hallelujah! Danielle and Alexander Meitiv have been cleared of any wrongdoing in the Dec. 20 incident when they let their kids walk home from the park in Silver Spring, MD. As Donna St. George in the Washington Post reports:

A Maryland couple investigated for neglect after they let their two young children walk home alone from local parks have been cleared in one of two such cases, according to the family’s attorneys and documents.

The new Child Protective Services finding, which follows an appeal, comes as the experiences of “free range” parents Danielle and Alexander Meitiv have drawn national attention, sparking debate about parenting choices and how far local officials should go to enforce laws designed to protect children.

It overturns a previous CPS decision that held the Meitivs responsible for “unsubstantiated” child neglect, a finding typically made when there is conflicting or insufficient information for a more definitive conclusion.

The change came as a welcome surprise to the Meitivs, who were informed in letters they received May 18 that neglect was “ruled out” in the case, which dates to their children’s December walk from Woodside Park.

“It was an enormous relief and vindication,” Danielle Meitiv said in a Washington Post interview, the family’s first in six weeks. “Of course there’s no neglect here. There never was. There was never even a hint of it.”

While strike one against them is now gone, strike two remains to be dealt with: That’s the time they allowed their kids to walk home from a local park yet again — the little recidivists. The kids were held for five hours, and the authorities didn’t even notify the parents until about three hours in.

“We’re hopeful it will be resolved in the same way,” Danielle Meitiv said. “The facts of the two are the same. They’re the same kids, we’re the same parents. They were walking in the same neighborhood. . . . Neither case is neglect so we’re hopeful that CPS will just see that and move on.”

Danielle Meitiv said she stopped giving interviews April 13, both at the advice of lawyers and because the most recent experience became upsetting to talk about.

She said she’s speaking out now in hopes the new ruling may assuage the fears of other parents who want to let their children venture outdoors to walk or play, but are worried about CPS involvement. “It’s also really good news,” she said.

The Meitivs advocate free-range parenting, which encourages independence and exploration. The term was first coined in 2008 by New York journalist Lenore Skenazy, who developed a following for pushing back against what many saw as a hypervigilant “helicopter parent” culture.

Actually, at this point that New York journalist would like to clarify that she is not pushing back against helicopter parents — she feels parents can raise their kids however they see fit. She is (I hear) pushing back against an entire culture that sees children only through the lens of danger, trauma and fragility, which then tends to overreact to any threat, no matter how remote.

http://www.freerangekids.com/maryland-meitivs-cleared-of-first-neglect-charge/
 
CPS may look for guidance to a state law about leaving children unattended, which says children younger than 8 must be left with a reliable person who is at least 13 years old.

Here we are again with hard lines in the sand from the state where gray area and parental discretion should exist.


Sacramento prodigy Tanishq Abraham just graduated from college at age 11 – with three degrees.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/education/article22161726.html
 
I think a good compromise here is to have all underage citizens where ankle bracelets give kids free cell phones.

You're safer when you're watched. It's good to have communication ability.
 
Last edited:
By 10 a country kid can feed and water the livestock, drive a 4-wheeler and tractor, use basic tools, dispense medicine, clean house(under threat of bodily harm), and countless other mundane tasks.....

Is it okay to burn the cities and their inhabitants yet?
LOL by 10, why did you get off so easy????!!!??? I was mowing by Kindergarten. Couldn't reach the peddle to stop it lol.
 
I walked to kindergarten by myself everyday and that was probably near a mile. I used to get sent to the "Farm Fresh" store regularly by myself to get whatever was wanted. I'm sure the number of trips I made as a 5-6 year alone, far outnumber those made with adult supervision.

Seems weird now thinking about it.
 
Back
Top