PA Hearing: 604,000 votes for Biden and 3,200 for Trump in 90 minutes

GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
If this is not evidence of voter fraud, what is?
Click to expand...

I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
 
CaptUSA said:
I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
Click to expand...

Where else was Trump Voter mail in turn out so bad? I remember reading something about the speed of the machines and how it limits the possible number of ballots that can be processed in a given period of time.
 
CaptUSA said:
I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
Click to expand...

All you have to do is just start looking at other big cities to see that the only areas with these crazy abnormalities were in the swing states that Biden won.

Cleveland had like a 50%+ voter turnout, and Milwaukee had like a 90%+ turnout.

The mail-in ballot ratio was also significantly different in these areas where Biden won, compared to other areas where he lost, including similar types of cities in swing states.
 
It's like we have a dead body, and the people with motive and opportunity for murder are saying "that doesn't prove anything."
 
dannno said:
All you have to do is just start looking at other big cities to see that the only areas with these crazy abnormalities were in the swing states that Biden won.

Cleveland had like a 50%+ voter turnout, and Milwaukee had like a 90%+ turnout.

The mail-in ballot ratio was also significantly different in these areas where Biden won, compared to other areas where he lost, including similar types of cities in swing states.
Click to expand...
No question. It certainly looks like fraud. But is it provable? So far, the evidence isn’t proof. It’s strong circumstantial, but no smoking gun. Yet.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
It's like we have a dead body, and the people with motive and opportunity for murder are saying "that doesn't prove anything."
Click to expand...

A man shoots another. He throws the pistol in a river and it is not recoverable. There is no forensic evidence. 100 eyewitnesses come forward and testify that they saw the man shoot another. They describe the crime, the place and the time.

THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!

That's the equivalent of the bullshit I keep hearing from bobbleheads.
 
Does anyone know what time this 600k ballot dump took place? Would it be safe to say that it happened in the morning hours the day after they election while the where supposedly shut down? There was total 2,600,000 mail in ballots? How could they count all those ballots in a few hours and take days and days to count the other 77%? Lets say it took 8 hours to count 23%, the remaining 77% should have been counted in another 27 hours. The counting would have been done much sooner.
 
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
Does anyone know what time this 600k ballot dump took place? Would it be safe to say that it happened in the morning hours the day after they election while the where supposedly shut down? There was total 2,600,000 mail in ballots? How could they count all those ballots in a few hours and take days and days to count the other 77%? Lets say it took 8 hours to count 23%, the remaining 77% should have been counted in another 27 hours. The counting would have been done much sooner.
Click to expand...

It's auto-magical!
 
When you hear 600,000 for Joey and 3200 for Trump, that sounds excessive. When you look at it as 200 for Joe and 1 for Trump, it doesn't seem too terribly unreasonable. S/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Trump DOJ moves to dismiss Biden-era case against Idaho’s total ban on abortions
Replies
0
Views
36
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Trump undoes stack of 'harmful' Biden executive orders, shrinks multiple agencies
Replies
0
Views
31
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Trump Halts All Aid to the Palestinian Authority Security Forces
Replies
4
Views
70
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Anti Federalist
Biden pre-emptively pardons Fauci, Milley and all 6 Jan witnesses and committee
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
5K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Snowball
My research now indicates Trump will win PA and another term in office.
2 3 4
Replies
74
Views
7K
Snowball
Snowball
Back
Top