Other than the Presidential Election which is the best way to fight for our freedom?

[staerker]

Are you referring to direct democracy?

No, I mean great ideas, that force government solutions out of existence.

Current example: cryptocurrencies vs. bank controlled Fiat.

Sure, we all know sound money is better than Fiat. But it has been unable to compete effectively.

Cue future solutions.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

No, I mean great ideas, that force government solutions out of existence.

Current example: cryptocurrencies vs. bank controlled Fiat.

Sure, we all know sound money is better than Fiat. But it has been unable to compete effectively.

Cue future solutions.

I like the notion, but to be effective the same issue of unity is needed, or such lucrative activity/ideas that no one will bother with the government structure including its economics.

I should think that if such things were likely, or even possible, a few fairly advantageous ideas would be competing slightly.

I would venture that alternative societal structures that are more rewarding with greater stability and security might be something close to what you suggest rather than ideas that would merge with existing society.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Every single post you've ever made on this site boils down to one statement:

"Seriously, it'll work this time, guys."

The framers' ideas crashed and burned during the framers' lifetimes.

This isn't on me: it's on you. Show one way in the last 240 years where these ideas actually worked.

I have posted facts showing that that the press prevented the people from learning about the framers intentions or subverted those intentions starting right after the framing documents were signed.

The framers ideas will work, but the people must be functional to make them work.

I would appreciate some logical function from you regarding the facts posted.